Its becoming more and more rare lately to find a fight that doesn't end up with one person ramming another. When all you need to do is get a new plane - there's no punishment for being an bellybutton and ace piloting someone simply because they're on the losing end of a fight.
Why didn’t you turn away to avoid the HO???
Sure, head-on attacks happened, but it was a real-life, life-ending game of chicken with no respawns.
It was actually part of the real Air Cadets training. My Dad flew P47’s andP51’s and his Army Air Core training instructed him to turn into the enemy, no matter what direction the enemy was traveling, close the distance and fire. Remember in real life they fought as winged pairs. Two P47’s head on to a 109, sixteen 50Cals firing.
So...I'm sure this horse has been beaten to death, but...
Mnay, many, many, many, many times.
I'd like to see ppl who intentionally ram get grounded to the tower for a period of time - not much, maybe 30 seconds or a minute. What constitutes deliberate ramming? I'm not a programmer, but there's gotta be a way to determine if a collision course remains unchanged or deviated only slightly in a convergence. If we can figure out bullet trajectory and damage (and the results therein), then it should be feasible to figure out two bodies colliding and determining cause and effect.
I don’t think so, unless mind reading can be programmed. The problem is, and you said it yourself, “Intent” If you been involved in an HO and I’m guessing that you have, that you flew your aircraft in such a manor as to place it directly in line with another aircraft and an AH collision occurred, well, that was your own doing. Go sit in the tower.
And while we're at it - beating the dead horse - why is it that I get rammed by someone else, I get a shot down message, and he continues to fly?
That’s the AH Lotto system at work. Pick a number between 0 and 1. You lose, thanks for playing.
I've pretty much given up flying fighters at this point - I GV and bomb and will sometimes fly tactical when the conditions permit. This has really ruined the game for me.
That’s your choice and that’s to bad. Have you thought about joining a squad and winging up.
Now - before your egos and forum warriors start flaming away - I try to position myself so that head-ons don't happen. I've been known to initiate a head-on myself, but never for the deliberate purpose of ramming.
Does anyone else consider this a problem, and what else can be done about it? Perk 95% of all aircraft to discourage ram attacks and perhaps give some incentive to bring an aircraft home?
I consider the HO a legitimate air combat tactic and do not have a problem with an enemy placing his aircraft directly in front of my gun sight.
Ramming as a tactic was performed by both Japan and Germany as a combat strategy. It was also performed by American and British pilots as an act of heroism . Should it be banned from the game. Air Warrior didn’t allow collisions, that was their answer. You just flew through an enemy plane. I’d rather see a better collision model in AH, one that would inflect the right amount of damage onto all aircraft involved. I’d also like to see collisions between friendly aircraft modeled into the game and friendly fire damage as well.
It is a pain to be rammed? yes, have I seen it employed as a strategy? Yes, by some. Does it make me want to leave the game or limit my game play? No way. I suspect there is perhaps more then ramming involved with your dissatisfaction with the game.
Your welcome to come fly with our Squad on Saturday Evening, vox 113, Knights, LWA 7:00PM EST. 113th Lucky Strikes. Come fly with us , wing up, have some fun.