Author Topic: 3 sector 163's  (Read 3199 times)

Offline W7LPNRICK

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
      • Ham Radio Antenna Experiments
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #30 on: October 05, 2010, 12:18:01 AM »
Right after take-off, at full throttle, I fly flat and level until above 450mph, then auto-climb between 10-12,000ft depending on if I'm going after high bombers. Much better fuel economy at alt. Once at altitude, level off, open E6B file and throttle back to keep speed above 400-425ish and fuel consumption as low as possible. Then I check the E6B, a lot, especially in the last 2 minutes. If far from home, auto climb at full throttle with 1 min remaining, then set auto-climb speed at 175-200 and glide home. If bad guys in the area glide as fast as possible to still make it home.  :old:  :airplane:
WildWzl
Ft Bragg Jump School-USAF Kunsan AB, Korea- Clark AB P.I.- Korat, Thailand-Tinker AFB Ok.- Mtn Home AFB Idaho
F-86's, F-4D, F-4G, F-5E Tiger II, C-130, UH-1N (Twin Engine Hueys) O-2's. E3A awacs, F-111, FB-111, EF-111,

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #31 on: October 05, 2010, 08:02:44 AM »
GPH does not change based on alt.
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline grizz441

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7001
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #32 on: October 05, 2010, 08:38:37 AM »
Milkin' the mileage; keeping the undercarriage while in flight; and re-armin'/re-fuelin' the me162 is in fact gaming the game at its best.  To each his own, no doubt.  but to argue that it "is not" and then to list the items you did seem a bit hypocritical, no?   

You must not have a HOTAS setup.

Offline W7LPNRICK

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2050
      • Ham Radio Antenna Experiments
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #33 on: October 06, 2010, 02:50:15 PM »
GPH does not change based on alt.

? No, of course not. However thinner air requires less throttle to maintain the same speed, hence less GPH d/t lower throttle settings. Not lower GPH at same throttle setting, Right? Not what I said.  :old:
WildWzl
Ft Bragg Jump School-USAF Kunsan AB, Korea- Clark AB P.I.- Korat, Thailand-Tinker AFB Ok.- Mtn Home AFB Idaho
F-86's, F-4D, F-4G, F-5E Tiger II, C-130, UH-1N (Twin Engine Hueys) O-2's. E3A awacs, F-111, FB-111, EF-111,

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #34 on: October 06, 2010, 03:28:29 PM »
Well, the wording got tricky....  "Fuel Economy" made me immediately think about GPH.  But yes, 100% agree with you, the speed factor up top is far better than the dense air down below.   :salute

? No, of course not. However thinner air requires less throttle to maintain the same speed, hence less GPH d/t lower throttle settings. Not lower GPH at same throttle setting, Right? Not what I said.  :old:
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10190
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #35 on: October 06, 2010, 03:37:50 PM »
Still waiting for an answer... :headscratch:
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline Tec

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1739
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #36 on: October 06, 2010, 04:21:15 PM »
Still waiting for an answer... :headscratch:

Is your google broken?  Besides VonMessa already answered it for you.
To each their pwn.
K$22L7AoH

Offline cooldued

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 495
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #37 on: October 06, 2010, 10:12:05 PM »
What do you mean?  Like someone flew their 163 three sectors from a 163 base and landed it?  That's not difficult at all, a mere 75 miles is nothing when you are traveling at that speed. Are you making the assumption that the 163 has to land at the same base it took off from?  You can use the throttle to decease fuel consumption in the 163 just like any other birds.  The 163 can glide pretty good, so you could shut the engine off and glide a fair distance.

He meant the 163 would run out of fuel quickly. Yet at the same time it isn't a skill its a mater of velocity, throttle, and a little luck not "skill". So if you do it right its pretty easy.

ha ha no errors! :D
Planes I'm good in the Bf-109 G14, the B-25C, and the B-17G not many but its nice for me to know :P

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #38 on: October 07, 2010, 12:51:57 PM »
Still waiting for an answer... :headscratch:

The question is, IRL, why would you?

You can't steer.  You have no brakes.  Would you land an A/C with no brakes when your life was on the line?



IIRC, one of the dolly issues was it bouncing up and taking out the plane after it was released.


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #39 on: October 07, 2010, 01:27:44 PM »
The question is, IRL, why would you?

You can't steer.  You have no brakes.  Would you land an A/C with no brakes when your life was on the line?



IIRC, one of the dolly issues was it bouncing up and taking out the plane after it was released.


wrongway

So was landing to hard on the first shot (without a small bounce first) to pre-compress the piston/spring on the skid.  It resulted in a number of pilots suffering from a broken back.
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10190
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #40 on: October 07, 2010, 03:00:50 PM »
Is your google broken?  Besides VonMessa already answered it for you.

The condition of my Google is a private matter! :lol
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #41 on: October 07, 2010, 10:14:52 PM »
Would you land an A/C with no brakes when your life was on the line?

There's still no brakes even if the dolly's off.   :D

And yes, the bouncing dolly on release was a potential problem.  Speaking of bouncing Dolly...  ;)
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline perdue3

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4692
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #42 on: October 08, 2010, 02:43:37 PM »
Take off, stay at 200mph, rearm.

perdweeb
C.O. Kommando Nowotny 

FlyKommando.com

 

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #43 on: October 08, 2010, 02:56:54 PM »
There's still no brakes even if the dolly's off.   :D

And yes, the bouncing dolly on release was a potential problem.  Speaking of bouncing Dolly...  ;)

Brakes = Friction.

Landing skid = brakes.

more or less.


wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: 3 sector 163's
« Reply #44 on: October 08, 2010, 02:59:40 PM »
He meant the 163 would run out of fuel quickly. Yet at the same time it isn't a skill its a mater of velocity, throttle, and a little luck not "skill". So if you do it right its pretty easy.

ha ha no errors! :D

Are you sure about that?  I spotted at least 3 right off the bat. 

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song