Author Topic: A new ship!  (Read 3302 times)

Offline TheDudeDVant

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2429
A new ship!
« on: October 11, 2010, 07:19:57 PM »
That would represent the puffy fire control ship.. A radar ship if you will..  Some new cool ship we could destroy to stop the puffy ack.. Instead of having to destroy them all..

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2010, 07:25:57 PM »
Why?  Is it your intent that if this ship is sunk then the CV fleet would not be able to fire puffy acks?

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Void

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 293
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2010, 07:30:53 PM »
If that was to take affect,let's see.... No more puffy ack on destroyers( only manned 5")
And the aa ship could be the atlanta class CA, or the Akatsuki DD.
In Game name: Namco

Offline Void

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 293
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #3 on: October 11, 2010, 07:31:52 PM »
Why?  Is it your intent that if this ship is sunk then the CV fleet would not be able to fire puffy acks?

ack-ack

 Or a ship to greatly reduce puffy.
In Game name: Namco

Offline TheDudeDVant

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2429
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #4 on: October 11, 2010, 07:34:15 PM »
Why?  Is it your intent that if this ship is sunk then the CV fleet would not be able to fire puffy acks?

ack-ack
uhh yea!  We're not ever going to get rid of the puffgods.. At least give us some central target we can go after to stop it.. And we'll get new targets for the war winners.. Its WIN WIN!

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2010, 07:35:41 PM »
If that was to take affect,let's see.... No more puffy ack on destroyers( only manned 5")
And the aa ship could be the atlanta class CA, or the Akatsuki DD.

There would still be puffy acks on destroyers, what do you think those 5" guns fired in AA mode?  


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline JHerne

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 659
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #6 on: October 11, 2010, 07:36:23 PM »
Well, since Fletcher Class destroyers were each equipped with a CiC, and most served as radar pickets, and they all carried independent SC-series radar (with the exception of the USS Pringle, which carried SA), and since each Mk 14 Fire Control Director was equipped with an additional Mk. 22 radar, and since each ship carried its own set of SG radar....

I would say...

-1
Skunkworks AvA Researcher and
Primary Cause of Angst

Offline JHerne

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 659
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2010, 07:40:30 PM »
And don't even get me started on SC-1 and SC-2 series radar carried by the bigger ships.

You want an Atlanta? Early war or late war?

So you want SIX twin 5"/38 turrets, and six or more quad 40mm mounts?

Ugh.
Skunkworks AvA Researcher and
Primary Cause of Angst

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #8 on: October 11, 2010, 07:42:00 PM »
If you want to fix puffy ack, make it actually FIRED by the guns, not auto-generated around the target as they are now. That way there's actual time of flight and aim correction rather than a magic kill box.
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Void

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 293
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #9 on: October 11, 2010, 07:43:59 PM »
And don't even get me started on SC-1 and SC-2 series radar carried by the bigger ships.

You want an Atlanta? Early war or late war?

So you want SIX twin 5"/38 turrets, and six or more quad 40mm mounts?

Ugh.

It would basically replace 2 destroyers.
In Game name: Namco

Offline JHerne

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 659
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #10 on: October 11, 2010, 08:08:39 PM »
It would basically replace 2 destroyers.

Uhhh, no.... A single Atlanta has 6 twin guns, equaling a total of 12 barrels. That would be three destroyers, going on the premise that 4 turrets are available on a Fletcher. In addition, and I'm not sure they modeled it in AH or not, but the Fletcher used a 5"/25 caliber gun, while the Gearings and Sumners, and all larger class ships with twin mounts (Essex, Pittsburgh Class CAs, Atlanta Class CLAA, Iowa Class, SoDak, Washington class, etc) all used 5"/38 caliber weapons.

What you're asking for, a radar control ship, didn't happen in WW2. A WW2 ship was USED as the first radar control ship, the USS Saipan, a CVL, but that was post war.

I have no problem with eliminating auto-puffy and adding an Atlanta Class CLAA to compensate, or even upgrading the Fletcher-esque destroyers we have now to Sumners. In fact, I'm all for it. But sinking a ship and having that one ship reduce the effectiveness of the AA overall is not a great idea.
Skunkworks AvA Researcher and
Primary Cause of Angst

Offline Beefcake

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #11 on: October 11, 2010, 09:10:47 PM »
How about this, rather than sinking some magical ship that controls all the flak guns why don't you just sink the CV instead and voila! Problem solved in 5 minutes.
Retired Bomber Dweeb - 71 "Eagle" Squadron RAF

Offline E25280

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3475
      • http://125thspartanforums.com
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #12 on: October 11, 2010, 09:20:18 PM »
Uhhh, no.... A single Atlanta has 6 twin guns, equaling a total of 12 barrels. That would be three destroyers, going on the premise that 4 turrets are available on a Fletcher.

Fletcher class destroyers have 5 turrets.
Brauno in a past life, followed by LTARget
SWtarget in current incarnation
Captain and Communications Officer~125th Spartans

"Proudly drawing fire so that my brothers may pass unharmed."

Offline Void

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 293
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #13 on: October 11, 2010, 09:26:12 PM »
How about this, rather than sinking some magical ship that controls all the flak guns why don't you just sink the CV instead and voila! Problem solved in 5 minutes.

Which you could kill that ship and 75% of your problem is an instant removal. :neener:
In Game name: Namco

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: A new ship!
« Reply #14 on: October 11, 2010, 09:43:49 PM »
     Interesting, but a bit scary  :D



The Oakland class



     Btw JHerne, this one has 16 5 inch in 8 turrets, 6 inline and 2 others just forward of the stern battery.
« Last Edit: October 11, 2010, 09:47:50 PM by Rino »
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars