Author Topic: M18....  (Read 1608 times)

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10166
Re: M18....
« Reply #15 on: October 28, 2010, 03:31:41 PM »
I thought the Firefly was classified as a tank destroyer.

 :cheers:

You are correct Sir. 
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: M18....
« Reply #16 on: October 28, 2010, 03:53:22 PM »
I thought the Firefly was classified as a tank destroyer.

 :cheers:

     By whom?  Was the Sherman also classed as a TD?
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline FLOTSOM

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2822
      • http://www.myspace.com/prfctstrngr
Re: M18....
« Reply #17 on: October 28, 2010, 04:03:00 PM »
     By whom?  Was the Sherman also classed as a TD?

ummmmmm................no the Sherman was classified as a Ronson!  :neener: :rofl :neener:
FLOTSOM

Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups!
Quote from Skuzzy
"The game is designed to encourage combat, not hide from it."
http://www.myspace.com/prfctstrngr

Offline redwing7

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 288
Re: M18....
« Reply #18 on: October 28, 2010, 04:52:21 PM »
     By whom?  Was the Sherman also classed as a TD?

The firefly was classified as a TD because of the 17lb main gun and the way it was deployed in combat if irc.

ummmmmm................no the Sherman was classified as a Ronson!  :neener: :rofl :neener:

That's pretty much it.
THUNDER MOB

"and when they bury me, may it be face down...so all my critics can kiss my ass!"  Bobby Knight

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: M18....
« Reply #19 on: October 29, 2010, 12:24:55 PM »
can anyone from HTC comment on this? id like a discussion about this and why exactly it would do what pyro said...
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: M18....
« Reply #20 on: October 29, 2010, 01:01:05 PM »
It could be it's just HTC's reaction to you posting 487 different wishlist threads on the M-18 too :)

Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline redwing7

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 288
Re: M18....
« Reply #21 on: October 29, 2010, 01:42:29 PM »
It could be it's just HTC's reaction to you posting 487 different wishlist threads on the M-18 too :)



You know the old saying, "the squeaky wheel gets the grease"

 :D
THUNDER MOB

"and when they bury me, may it be face down...so all my critics can kiss my ass!"  Bobby Knight

Offline Fatboy26

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83
Re: M18....
« Reply #22 on: October 29, 2010, 06:16:45 PM »
You know what else could be used as a Tank destroyer?

Me410 :noid
Proudly campaigning (screaming, whining, begging, pleading) for the addition of the Me410 to AH2

Fatboy

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: M18....
« Reply #23 on: October 29, 2010, 06:46:40 PM »
     By whom?  Was the Sherman also classed as a TD?

No, not the "Sherman" per say, but rather the British Sherman w/ the 17lb'er cannon mounted on top (the "Firefly").  The British put 1 Firefly in with 4-5 Shermans w/ the 75mm and the Firefly's main duty was to seek out and destroy enemy armor, not engage infantry, etc.  Also, the hull MG was omitted as well, even more of a reason to keep it away from enemy infantry.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17934
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: M18....
« Reply #24 on: October 29, 2010, 06:52:20 PM »
You know the old saying, "the squeaky wheel gets the grease"

 :D


Nawwww, I just do away with it and get a new wheel   :P

Offline Larry

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6123
Re: M18....
« Reply #25 on: October 29, 2010, 07:05:00 PM »
It could be it's just HTC's reaction to you posting 487 different wishlist threads on the M-18 too :)



And hijacking countless others. :D
Once known as ''TrueKill''.
JG 54 "Grünherz"
July '18 KOTH Winner


Offline Dichotomy

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12386
Re: M18....
« Reply #26 on: October 29, 2010, 07:41:10 PM »
It could be it's just HTC's reaction to you posting 487 different wishlist threads on the M-18 too :)



actually I slipped them a $20 to deny it just to be mean since I cant have a Foo Fighter and Bar showed no love for MY requests.. :)
JG11 - Dicho37Only The Proud Only The Strong AH Players who've passed on :salute

Offline FLOTSOM

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2822
      • http://www.myspace.com/prfctstrngr
Re: M18....
« Reply #27 on: October 29, 2010, 07:51:56 PM »
You know the old saying, "the squeaky wheel gets the grease"

 :D

i thought that saying went like "the sqeaker get the squelch".......but i could be wrong  :D
FLOTSOM

Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups!
Quote from Skuzzy
"The game is designed to encourage combat, not hide from it."
http://www.myspace.com/prfctstrngr

Offline redwing7

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 288
Re: M18....
« Reply #28 on: October 29, 2010, 08:30:13 PM »

Nawwww, I just do away with it and get a new wheel   :P
i thought that saying went like "the sqeaker get the squelch".......but i could be wrong  :D

 :rofl :rofl
THUNDER MOB

"and when they bury me, may it be face down...so all my critics can kiss my ass!"  Bobby Knight

Offline WWhiskey

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3122
Re: M18....
« Reply #29 on: October 29, 2010, 09:48:45 PM »
due to laziness i decided to copy and paste Ghosth statement and my responce from the post mentioned above into this post without change.

Quote from: Ghosth on Today at 11:42:08 AM
321 just as an FYI the M18 came up in discussion at con. Pyro's short answer, its just too good, would make all other GV's irrelevant and have a huge negative impact on gameplay even if perked.


i have no understanding on this line of logic.

yes the M18 was fast (fastest of the tank destroyers) but that was only useful on open ROADS, it was still a multi-ton (17ish) piece of metal when it was off road thus the actual speed was dictated by terrain.

it has a skin about as durable as an orange peal. 0.2 to 1.0 inches. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M18_Hellcat for M18 stats, yes its wikkie but i cant find anything to contradict it) this translates to meaning that a solid .50 cal burst would not only penetrate most of its hull (see http://www.inetres.com/gp/military/infantry/mg/50_ammo.html for .50 cal stats) but would easily kill the crew inside, additionally any 20mm or bigger round striking it would decimate the M18. this ease of destruction is also true for any bomb landing near it or any HE shell landing close. you would have to park 3 of these abreast to stop an AP round fired from a tiger at close range!

its an egg shell with a cannon. in the real world it served its purpose efficiently because the allies held air superiority, without it this vehicle would have been destroyed en-mass on the field. as it would be in our arena's, providing the armor is modeled correctly, and it's use of super high speed on open terrain comes with consequences (hell if a sheep could flip a 50 ton tiger at 20 mph what would it do to an M18 at 50?   ). almost every plane in the game could destroy or disable it without ords of any kind.

so go ahead put it in, model it correctly and I'm gonna laugh watching the screaming on 200 and counting all the "MY UBBER M18 GOT KILLED BY A........." threads that will in no time flood this board.


 :neener: :neener: :neener:
while I really want the M-18,,, the fact that I have bounced many a round off of m-3's m-8's and countless other gv's with as little or less armor, would seem to add to pyro's assessment that the M-18 would just be too good!
I still think it would be awesome,I don't care that it would screw up the GV balance,,, the 262 screws up the plane balance in the same way,, yet the perks it cost to fly fixes that problem!  IMHO.
I would like to have the Yak -3  yet it did not even make the new plane poll,,, I was pretty sure it was in the top 3 last time we had one!  What gives?
Flying since tour 71.