Author Topic: Who didn't vote for B29  (Read 5892 times)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #255 on: November 12, 2010, 02:42:51 PM »
Now for the P61  :cheers:
But the P-61 doesn't represent the pinnacle of WWII nightfighters.  That is the Mosquito NF.30.

Also, the future of bombers was the path the Mosquito bombers and Ar234 showed.  The B-29 was the last gasp of the gun turret bombers.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline skribetm

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 781
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #256 on: November 12, 2010, 03:06:41 PM »
i hope we get the non-turreted B-29's w/ extra incendiary's that wouldnt damage GV's.

Offline Reschke

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7724
      • VF-17 "The Jolly Rogers"
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #257 on: November 12, 2010, 05:09:37 PM »
Me

Why should I vote for that plane...it isn't like we need ANOTHER 4 engine strategic NOE plane in the game.
Buckshot
Reschke from March 2001 till tour 146
Founder and CO VF-17 Jolly Rogers September 2002 - December 2006
"I'm baaaaccccckkk!"

Offline R 105

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 978
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #258 on: November 13, 2010, 01:47:58 PM »
The B-29 will just turn into another 4 engined Stuka at GV spawns. However if the wings snap off in a Stuka like dive as they should I may like it better. I hope it is perked high enough that most player will not use it like that.

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #259 on: November 13, 2010, 01:50:19 PM »
Even for the careless, such actions will not go for long..... Once we all start losing the thousands of bomber perks we have, there will never be SuperStukas.   :D

The B-29 will just turn into another 4 engined Stuka at GV spawns. However if the wings snap off in a Stuka like dive as they should I may like it better. I hope it is perked high enough that most player will not use it like that.
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #260 on: November 13, 2010, 02:01:50 PM »
The B-29 will just turn into another 4 engined Stuka at GV spawns. However if the wings snap off in a Stuka like dive as they should I may like it better. I hope it is perked high enough that most player will not use it like that.
How many Mosquito Mk XVIs get used as Stukas?  It is far cheaper, and likely for more effective and survivable in that role, yet I doubt it is used like that very often.  It is only 30 perk points and I would expect the B-29 to be anywhere from 3.3 to 10 times as expensive.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #261 on: November 13, 2010, 02:09:06 PM »
Never in 1000 years would I use my Mossie for such things...... EGADS Man, bite your tongue.........  :lol

How many Mosquito Mk XVIs get used as Stukas?  It is far cheaper, and likely for more effective and survivable in that role, yet I doubt it is used like that very often.  It is only 30 perk points and I would expect the B-29 to be anywhere from 3.3 to 10 times as expensive.


But while we're on the subject, Karnak makes a pretty darn good point.   :aok
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Online The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17699
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #262 on: November 13, 2010, 02:55:19 PM »
How many Mosquito Mk XVIs get used as Stukas?  It is far cheaper, and likely for more effective and survivable in that role, yet I doubt it is used like that very often.  It is only 30 perk points and I would expect the B-29 to be anywhere from 3.3 to 10 times as expensive.

Thats the only thing I have left to hope for with the B29, perks. People don't care how effective a plane is, or how survivable it is. Most players (NOT ALL PLAYERS) are out for the biggest bang for the buck. Big bomb load and quick time to target is what they "need". Cost in lives, planes and at first even perk points will be unimportant. I'm hoping it's perked high enough that most people blow through them in the first weekend of release....one I hope to be away vacationing some place  :D

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23872
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #263 on: November 13, 2010, 03:09:46 PM »
As I see again reference to heavy bombers bombing tanks  in AH, just a few numbers to put things into perspective:


Last tour, less than 10% of all M4A3(76) (the AH mainstay tank)  that had been killed by planes were bombed by the Big Four. Out of ~740 M4 that died every day, only about 10 were carpet bombed.

 :old: :D
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10118
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #264 on: November 13, 2010, 03:21:11 PM »
Some of you guys are hilarious!!!

CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline cobia38

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1258
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #265 on: November 13, 2010, 05:30:57 PM »
How many Mosquito Mk XVIs get used as Stukas?  It is far cheaper, and likely for more effective and survivable in that role, yet I doubt it is used like that very often.  It is only 30 perk points and I would expect the B-29 to be anywhere from 3.3 to 10 times as expensive.

  would rather pay 200 perks for a shiny 29 then 30 for a wooden mossy with no guns  :neener:


  Harvesting taters,one  K4 at a time

Offline fullmetalbullet

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 834
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #266 on: November 13, 2010, 07:11:32 PM »
if i would have been around for the poll. my vote would have went to the HE-111 or Pe-2
"Cry Havoc, And Let Slip The Dogs Of War" Julius Caesar


Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15475
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #267 on: November 13, 2010, 07:29:42 PM »
I'm wondering if we will get the B-29H, which was the one with some structural enhancements and dive brakes for divebombing.  I'm looking forward to those 12 forward firing 50-cal MG's, 10 forward firing 20 mm cannon, 8 forward firing 40 mm, and the capabilty to carry 60 HVAR rockets under the wings.  I'm just wondering if they'll model the Sperry Target Master divebomb sight, which allows pickling off single 1000 lb-ers, predicting accurately where they will hit on the ground no matter what the aerial maneuver being done at the time.  Should be awesome.

Offline kvuo75

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3003
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #268 on: November 13, 2010, 07:38:13 PM »
As I see again reference to heavy bombers bombing tanks  in AH, just a few numbers to put things into perspective:
(Image removed from quote.)

Last tour, less than 10% of all M4A3(76) (the AH mainstay tank)  that had been killed by planes were bombed by the Big Four. Out of ~740 M4 that died every day, only about 10 were carpet bombed.

 :old: :D

quit bringing actual data into this  :D
kvuo75

Kill the manned ack.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
Re: Who didn't vote for B29
« Reply #269 on: November 13, 2010, 08:54:58 PM »
  would rather pay 200 perks for a shiny 29 then 30 for a wooden mossy with no guns  :neener:
Which is entirely beside the point of my post.  Maybe you ought to consider remedial English courses instead of earning perk points...
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-