While the control input respond in somewhat the same manner as "real life" airplanes that is where the similarity stops.
I can fly my RL RV-6 airplane all day long and never look at an instrument and know exactly what it is doing. In RL flying you
have "seat of the pants" as we call it feel for aircraft movements. You can tell if an airplane is in a climb or in a dive just
by the sound of the engine and by how heavy or light the feel of the controls are which is a good thing. In my RV-6 control
"feel" is very light at cruse speed and lower. When I get to speeds over 200mph they have an extremely heavy feel to
them, this is good the heavy control makes it harder make quick control inputs that tend to pull the wings off by over stressing
the airframe.
You are much more aware of outside visual reference than you are in AH that makes it much easier to constantly be aware
of your surroundings.
My reason for this is as a real life flight instructor you would think that after six years I would start having better than just
average scores and K/D ratio. the problem as I see it is that I try to fly AH airplanes and make them behave the same as
RL airplanes, and even knowing it is a cartoon airplane it is a hard thing to overcome.
Thoughts from other RL pilots?