AH experiment in response to Fugi's horde thread

[Guppy35]

Set up a single LW for a week.  Change the country names to anything but what they are, Sierra, Hotel, Lima or something similar.

1000 perks for winning the war each.

Conditions of the win, is your 'country has to take out both of the other countries. We're talking total conquest, complete destruction of every base. Make it also possible to have one country be eliminated, forcing the players to have to choose which other country they go to. 

I'd be really curious as  to who and how many would fly for the country on the end that was losing and how many would swarm to the 'winning' team in hopes of getting the perks of a potential 'win'

I'd also be curious as to how many of the 'horde buster' guys would stick it out to the end against the horde

[Lusche]

1000 perks is insanely high. Of course the winning country would have massive numbers with a "reward" like that. That's probably something like the total perks an average player can make in 6 months or even a year or so.

[Guppy35]

1000 perks is insanely high. Of course the winning country would have massive numbers with a "reward" like that. That's probably something like the total perks an average player can make in 6 months or even a year or so.

OK I don't pay attention to perks.  Make it reasonable.  Just curious to see how people would react

Yeah I know it's a non-starter, but can't stop me from having goofy thoughts!

[E25280]

I have the distinct feeling it would suck mightily for any "defender," and they would log out in frustration in very short order, leaving the winning side to capture the last 20 bases or so completely unopposed.

[Masherbrum]

I like this idea.  I'd also enjoy watching the "Elite Mission Planners" get smacked down.   

[Strip]

Make it really interesting and award the perk points to the side that loses.

 

Strip

[Masherbrum]

Make it really interesting and award the perk points to the side that loses.

 

Strip

"Charrrrrrlieeeeeeeeeeeeeee" & "Put the Torpedoes on the town!!!!!!!" would win em.   

[Scotch]

I don't feel like getting bomb vultched by corky and his horde again...

[oTRALFZo]

Set up a single LW for a week.  Change the country names to anything but what they are, Sierra, Hotel, Lima or something similar.

1000 perks for winning the war each.

Conditions of the win, is your 'country has to take out both of the other countries. We're talking total conquest, complete destruction of every base. Make it also possible to have one country be eliminated, forcing the players to have to choose which other country they go to. 

I'd be really curious as  to who and how many would fly for the country on the end that was losing and how many would swarm to the 'winning' team in hopes of getting the perks of a potential 'win'

I'd also be curious as to how many of the 'horde buster' guys would stick it out to the end against the horde



Genius!!
I do think HT should change the country aspect of it and get different people to fly together. Perhaps change the names every tour and have people choose a side. This whole chesspeice superhero stuff is a breeding ground for Napoleon armchair generals.

[ink]

if this was done I would have a blast, bet money which side I would fly on...........I love me a target rich enviorment, once my system is up and running ill post up some screenies of hords in action one particular shot I have 15 (if i remember correctly)  red guys within 1500 most within 600 and no less then 4 firing at me lol,  now that gets the blood pumpin:-)

[EskimoJoe]

Genius!!
I do think HT should change the country aspect of it and get different people to fly together. Perhaps change the names every tour and have people choose a side. This whole chesspeice superhero stuff is a breeding ground for Napoleon armchair generals.

I think it'd be more of a hassle for those who only wish to fly with friends, which (IMHO) there are far more people.

[oTRALFZo]

I think it'd be more of a hassle for those who only wish to fly with friends, which (IMHO) there are far more people.

I have no freinds thats why I would love this