Please Reconsider Damage.....

[LLogann]

Bunker was a poor choice of a word.  Barracks, ord, radar & fuel..... Well maybe not fuel.  

No, but thanks for your concern.  

You were discussing reinforced bunkers where, again?  You just mentioned objects.  We never had reinforced barracks or latrines in the Army.

It's a game concession, like many others.

Addition:  I simply think it would make almost everybody happy if we made small caliber ammunition 0 damage for such buildings.  Perhaps anything smaller than 12.7 so as not to include .50 cals? 

[Spikes]

You know that isn't true.......  The plane explosion does not cause damage........   err, if I'm following what you're saying. 

I just meant he can spray his butt off and hit it 30-40 times, kill it, then end up dying because he can't pull up.

[LLogann]

Valid point...... Oh I remember those good ole days.

I just meant he can spray his butt off and hit it 30-40 times, kill it, then end up dying because he can't pull up.

[dirtdart]

Radar sheds are made of tin.  So no to making them harder.  Yes on the ords. No ords Bunker should be able to be gunned down unless through the door.  Our puny rounds in most planes would not penetrate the concrete of a proper ammo storage Bunker. 

[RTHolmes]

we used a special kind of "tin" for our chain home transmitter and receiver blocks (sheds) - 4ft thick reinforced concrete:







these are the overground versions, many were in buried bunkers: