Author Topic: Early-War B-17  (Read 748 times)

Offline Wildcat1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2163
Early-War B-17
« on: January 15, 2011, 03:40:03 PM »
<S> guys

was flipping through the pages of a cool WW2 art book that a friend got for me, and this was one of the images that striked me:


this is Stan Stoke's "Birth of a Legend", and it recalls an encounter with Japanese ace Saburo Sukai and Capt. Collin Kelly on Dec. 10th, 1941

now, if you look closely, the B-17 in this painting is a D model. I'm a sucker for these birds, especially with that BEAUTIFUL bare-aluminium skin with the stripped tail, so i did some research on the D, and i found some pretty interesting stuff. specs:

Engine: Four Wright Cyclone R-1820-65
Horsepower: 1,200hp each
Span: 103ft 9in
Length: 67ft 11in
Empty Weight: 30,600lb
Maximum Loaded: 49,650lb
Max Speed: 323mph at 25,000 ft.
Cruising Speed:  227mph
Ceiling: 37,000ft
Range: 3,400 miles
Armament: One .30 cal and 6 .50 cal machine guns in nose, dorsal and ventral positions
Bomb load: 4,800lb
number produced: 42

i know some of you will be asking "why should we get a plane that only had 42 in service?". well, for one, the Ta-152 only had 43 produced, and the B-17D was, in fact, the first American bomber to see combat (in the air) in WW2. 35 were issued to the 19th BG in the Philipines, and durring the dark times of Dec. 1941 and early 1942, they played a minor role bombing Japanese shipping and ground emplacements in the defense of the Philipines.

12 more were stationed at Hickam Field in Hawaii, and 5 were destroyed durring the attacks on Pearl Harbor. And, B-17Ds even played a minor role durring the battle of Midway, bombing Japanese invasion ships

most were phased out by mid-1942 but she and more importantly the crews that flew her did everything they could when the situation in the Pacific looked bleak early on. this would, IMO, create a lot of opportunities for FSO and scenarios, and would fill somewhat of a gap in current EW FSOs, not having to use G-models anymore.

truly a beautiful bird, gotta love that paint scheme :aok

having fun and getting killed since tour 110
The King of 'Cobras. 350th FG, Tunisia 2016

Air Traffic Controller (Air Warfare/Surface Warfare) 2nd Class, USS John C. Stennis CVN-74

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2011, 04:24:07 PM »
Always want more variants, makes things awesome.
+3

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20387
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2011, 04:41:11 PM »
Would be a nice novelty, but there use was so limited early that the time to model it would probably be better served with the 17F

RAF took the first 12 17Cs into combat prior to the US getting into the war, but they were pretty much a failure
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #3 on: January 15, 2011, 04:47:16 PM »
 Yeah but who cares what the RAF did?   :D

RAF took the first 12 17Cs into combat prior to the US getting into the war, but they were pretty much a failure
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2011, 06:10:57 PM »
i made a topic a month ago asking for an early war b17, forget which model ether F or G.(whatever model ole 666 was) it would be great just for the scenarios alone.

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20387
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2011, 06:17:07 PM »
We had this conversation then too :)

Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2011, 05:12:11 PM »
Always want more variants, makes things awesome.
+3
your not gonna ask for your short stirling?

+1 to b17

Offline BrownBaron

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1832
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2011, 05:13:49 PM »
We totally need more Allied/heavy bombers!!1!!!

+666  :aok

[/sarcasm]
O Jagdgeschwader 77

Ingame ID: Johannes

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2011, 07:06:08 PM »
We totally need more Allied/heavy bombers!!1!!!

+666  :aok

[/sarcasm]
i'll counter your sarcasm by saying +1 to old 666 being added,

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #9 on: January 17, 2011, 02:02:34 AM »
your not gonna ask for your short stirling?

+1 to b17

The only thing I will take over the short is more variants.






Also, Short Stirling :noid

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #10 on: January 17, 2011, 10:05:59 AM »
O/T: Found this picture pretting interesting.  Never realised what a big aircraft the Short Stirling was.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/de/British_WW2_bombers_comparison.png

I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #11 on: January 17, 2011, 10:11:46 AM »
Early war needs more equipment a LOT more than late war does.

+1
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2011, 12:31:38 PM »
O/T: Found this picture pretting interesting.  Never realised what a big aircraft the Short Stirling was.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/de/British_WW2_bombers_comparison.png

(Image removed from quote.)
....that doesnt look very "short" at all...

Offline Mirage

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #13 on: January 17, 2011, 12:34:19 PM »
I am all for bombers that are easier to shoot down with out turning a Fw into a dump truck
Kommando Nowotny

I/Jg-301Gelb Zehn |

Offline perdue3

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4693
Re: Early-War B-17
« Reply #14 on: January 17, 2011, 02:20:10 PM »
Agreed with BrownBaron.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2011, 02:22:05 PM by perdue3 »
C.O. Kommando Nowotny 

FlyKommando.com