« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Down

Author Topic: very easy Ju-87 wish  (Read 1728 times)

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #15 on: January 28, 2011, 12:28:58 PM »
Logged

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #16 on: January 28, 2011, 12:34:48 PM »
Quote from: Dr_Death8 on January 28, 2011, 12:24:11 PM
Actually his is a legite wish, Ty. To add the 20mm gun platform, HTC would need to release the JU87 D4. The D4 were produced from D3, but there is the addition of a flame arrestor, 2-20mm MG 151/20 and the rear gunner's ammo was increased to 2,000 rnds.
 :salute
Reference:
Griehl, M., (2001), Junkers Ju 87 Stuka, p.38, Airlife Publishing Ltd.

The OTHER guy's wish (for 20mm's) is legit.

this thread? no.
Logged

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #17 on: January 28, 2011, 12:35:22 PM »
Quote from: Tyrannis on January 28, 2011, 12:13:59 PM
he said on another thread that dogfighting in a stuka was a stupid thing to do and for noob pilots,

and now he's asking for the "no bomb" option so he can go dogfight in a stuka?

he's ether trolling, or being a hypocrite....or both.

Where?

Here?
Quote from: Mirage on January 23, 2011, 12:44:34 AM
turning radius doesnt mean its a nice dogfighter, example, IMVHO the 190A-5 is a great dogfighter (although my lack of succes in it is due to my lack of skill) and it turns like a dumptruck, but it can climb good, and also pull a quick reversal, all the stuka can really do is flat turn

Or Here ?  (since they are the only posts in the thread made by him)

Quote from: Mirage on January 23, 2011, 01:02:10 AM
No doubt that a new stuka would draw a following of pilots, I like to fly it and try and sucker people into turning, the Ju-88 is fun to fight with aswell, I have only shot down two people in it but they were fun fights

and P.S, I would refer to the Ju 88 as a "shallow deccent bomber" as opposed to a dive bomber, as it was detrmined that the airframe could not take the stress, so it was recomended that they didnt exceed a 45 degree deccent  :)
Logged
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.

Offline Dr_Death8

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 574
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #18 on: January 28, 2011, 12:42:57 PM »
Quote from: Tyrannis on January 28, 2011, 12:34:48 PM
The OTHER guy's wish (for 20mm's) is legit.

this thread? no.
The OTHER guy's wish would need to be for the addition of the D4 version, not adding 2 MG 151/20 to the D3 model. Face it... :ahand  :salute
Logged

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #19 on: January 28, 2011, 12:46:57 PM »
Quote from: Dr_Death8 on January 28, 2011, 12:42:57 PM
The OTHER guy's wish would need to be for the addition of the D4 version, not adding 2 MG 151/20 to the D3 model. Face it... :ahand  :salute
.... i really dont know where your argument is coming from  :headscratch:

no one here is debating the adddition of the D model.

i simply said mirage was trolling by asking for the no-bomb option on the stuka.

from the other forum where someone was asking 20mm cannons on the stuka. (which i like that idea).

so...what are you arguing about?  :headscratch:  :huh
Logged

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #20 on: January 28, 2011, 02:41:31 PM »
Did Ju87s ever sortie as fighters?  Both the D3A and SBD were used as fighter cover at times due to a lack of A6Ms or F4Fs.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Mirage

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #21 on: January 28, 2011, 03:07:54 PM »
Quote from: Tyrannis on January 28, 2011, 12:46:57 PM
.... i really dont know where your argument is coming from  :headscratch:

no one here is debating the adddition of the D model.

i simply said mirage was trolling by asking for the no-bomb option on the stuka.

from the other forum where someone was asking 20mm cannons on the stuka. (which i like that idea).

so...what are you arguing about?  :headscratch:  :huh
lol may I ask why you think I am trolling when I ask for the ability to launch a plane even though the ords are down? I just think it would be fun to fly for a tour
Logged
Kommando Nowotny

I/Jg-301Gelb Zehn |

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15669
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #22 on: January 28, 2011, 05:15:25 PM »
didn't rudel once claim he could fight 2 vs 1 in his stuka and defeat the British planes   ;)
Logged
The Few ***
F.P.H

Offline LTARogue

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #23 on: January 29, 2011, 11:28:33 AM »
Doesn't Rudel have 11 kills in his Stuka?

LTARogue
Logged

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #24 on: January 30, 2011, 07:48:16 AM »
Quote from: Tyrannis on January 28, 2011, 11:58:12 AM
ok I understand now, you cant launch a stuka when ords are down, even if you dont want to take bombs.

thank you vonmessa and fugitive for pointing that out to me, I must have missed that when I read the OP.

fixed ...
Logged
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline MarineUS

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2679
      • Imperial Legion
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #25 on: January 30, 2011, 01:51:01 PM »
+11111111111111111111 :aok
Logged
Quote from: hitech on January 25, 2012, 04:01:23 PM
Like, ya know, when that thing that makes you move, it has pistons and things, When your thingamajigy is providing power, you do not hear other peoples thingamajig when they are providing power.

HiTech

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #26 on: January 30, 2011, 03:46:01 PM »
As I insinuated in my prior post, if it didn't sortie in an air superiority role during WWII then it shouldn't have the option to sortie without bombs in AH.  Both the SBD and D3A performed CAP missions at times due to inadequate supplies of F4Fs or A6Ms respectively.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Mirage

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #27 on: January 30, 2011, 03:53:26 PM »
explane the JU-88A-4's ability to not carry bombs? no JU-88A-4 was used for air superiority
Logged
Kommando Nowotny

I/Jg-301Gelb Zehn |

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #28 on: January 30, 2011, 04:12:43 PM »
Quote from: Tyrannis on January 28, 2011, 11:52:34 AM
i'll pretend your not trolling and take your question serious for a second.


why not just simply jettison your bombs before takeoff? easy to do.  :rolleyes:
i take it your the one trolling and you didnt even read his post. ords are down, u wanna get a stuka to the furball. cant really jettison your ords when ords are down now can you?
Logged

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #29 on: January 30, 2011, 04:17:43 PM »
Quote from: skorpion on January 30, 2011, 04:12:43 PM
i take it your the one trolling and you didnt even read his post. ords are down, u wanna get a stuka to the furball. cant really jettison your ords when ords are down now can you?
your late to the party.
this has allready been delt with,dont bring it up in an attempt to take shots at me.
because if we're taking shots at eachother, i'll just post the pics of me owning you in that 1v1 we had.
so,be a good boy and run along.
savvy? :ahand
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5   Go Up
« previous next »