Author Topic: very easy Ju-87 wish  (Read 1730 times)

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #60 on: January 30, 2011, 08:43:07 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: January 31, 2011, 08:52:08 AM by Skuzzy »

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #61 on: January 30, 2011, 10:03:21 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: January 31, 2011, 08:52:18 AM by Skuzzy »

Offline Avanti

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 282
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #62 on: January 30, 2011, 10:07:20 PM »
Also can we have this for the B-17's they also had some escort models which didn't take ords but were 'decoys' or loaded with ammo for enemy aircraft

Avanti

Offline Banshee7

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6595
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #63 on: January 30, 2011, 10:12:41 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: January 31, 2011, 08:52:35 AM by Skuzzy »
Tours 86 - 296

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #64 on: January 30, 2011, 10:22:57 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: January 31, 2011, 08:52:46 AM by Skuzzy »

Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #65 on: January 30, 2011, 11:24:50 PM »
See Rule #2
« Last Edit: January 31, 2011, 08:53:02 AM by Skuzzy »
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline Avanti

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 282
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #66 on: January 31, 2011, 02:23:08 AM »
 :noid

Offline Banshee7

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6595
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #67 on: January 31, 2011, 04:18:14 PM »
Now, what exactly was being said again.  All I can read is "See Rule #." 

I don't see anything wrong with the wish, and I would still like to know why some bombers have the option to not carry ord, as well.

#S#



Banshee7
Tours 86 - 296

Offline EskimoJoe

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4831
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #68 on: January 31, 2011, 05:08:14 PM »
Now, what exactly was being said again.  All I can read is "See Rule #."  

I don't see anything wrong with the wish, and I would still like to know why some bombers have the option to not carry ord, as well.

#S#



Banshee7

I'd assume Hitech didn't do this as, historically, the Stuka was designed to be a dive-bomber, not a dive-bomb-and-then-fighter.
Other than that, It's a good wish! I'd like to have the option to not carry ords on *all* aircraft, with exception of course the
heavy bomber aircraft IE: B17, B-29, etc.

Ah Tyrannis. You may want to leave your teenage angst behind when you post in these boards.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2011, 05:12:36 PM by EskimoJoe »
Put a +1 on your geekness atribute  :aok

Offline Mirage

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 375
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #69 on: January 31, 2011, 05:33:46 PM »
thanks for the positive input guys, and on a side note, did my thread just beat any sort of record for the most "see rule #.."'s?  :D
Kommando Nowotny

I/Jg-301Gelb Zehn |

Offline macleod01

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2735
      • http://www.71sqn.co.uk
Re: very easy Ju-87 wish
« Reply #70 on: January 31, 2011, 07:58:30 PM »
thanks for the positive input guys, and on a side note, did my thread just beat any sort of record for the most "see rule #.."'s?  :D

Positive input? The only positive input I can see here is that skuzzy got a weeks worth workout with his Rulestick!

 :P
seeds have been laid...but they arent trees we're growing. we're growing organic grenades!- 321BAR
I'd have a better chance in running into a Dodo Bird in the middle of rush hour, walking down the I-5 with two hookers in tow before I see a useful post from glock89- Ack-Ack