Author Topic: B-17F  (Read 3289 times)

Offline STEELE

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
Re: B-17F
« Reply #60 on: March 06, 2011, 02:33:08 PM »
G6/AS wouldve been a mazing in this latest 44-45 Scenario, instead we had to make due with the 43 model which was a total dog at high alt
The Kanonenvogel had 6 rounds per pod, this is not even close to being open for debate.

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: B-17F
« Reply #61 on: March 06, 2011, 08:46:36 PM »
i think this thread has been hacked...

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: B-17F
« Reply #62 on: March 06, 2011, 09:05:54 PM »
i think this thread has been hacked...
i think your right...

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: B-17F
« Reply #63 on: March 07, 2011, 09:28:13 PM »
oh well. honestly, the only part of AH i take real interest in is the bombing aspect. fighters have too many sub-versions of versions of types. anyways, sure, the lighter armed version of the B-17 would be cool, but what what about the YB-40 with like, twice the guns :D

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: B-17F
« Reply #64 on: March 07, 2011, 10:13:14 PM »
oh well. honestly, the only part of AH i take real interest in is the bombing aspect. fighters have too many sub-versions of versions of types. anyways, sure, the lighter armed version of the B-17 would be cool, but what what about the YB-40 with like, twice the guns :D
the yb-40 was an experiment that didnt last. i think only 10 were built total,they were so loaded down tho that they couldnt keep up with the bombers they were ment to protect. so in the end it became a failed project.

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: B-17F
« Reply #65 on: March 08, 2011, 09:05:48 PM »
sigh... its small details like that that ruin our lives... oh well. it was a cool experiment nonetheless