« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Rework: C-47 & Me 163  (Read 1159 times)

Offline USAFPilot

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #15 on: March 08, 2011, 06:31:51 PM »
I agree Latrobe

USAFPilot
Logged
Though I fly through the Valley of Death, I shall fear no evil, for I am 80,000 feet and climbing.

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #16 on: March 09, 2011, 04:47:49 AM »
Finish reworking all the planes first hitech please. Then the Short Stirling  :noid
Logged

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #17 on: March 10, 2011, 08:18:15 AM »
Quote from: MachFly on March 06, 2011, 12:17:36 AM
Need a Spitfire updates to the current standards  :noid                                                          :bolt:

+1. :aok
Logged



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #18 on: March 10, 2011, 08:20:00 AM »
The problem is that by the time the whole plane set has been graphicly updated the majority will be 10 years out of date again.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2011, 08:21:47 AM by Kazaa »
Logged



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #19 on: March 10, 2011, 08:22:08 AM »
Quote from: Kazaa on March 10, 2011, 08:18:15 AM
+1. :aok

wow I did not think anyone here would agree  :banana:
Logged
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Kazaa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8371
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #20 on: March 10, 2011, 08:32:11 AM »
Quote from: MachFly on March 10, 2011, 08:22:08 AM
wow I did not think anyone here would agree  :banana:

The Spitfire's 3D model definitely shows its age now. Especially when the standard of detail for new/updated planes seems to increase every year.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2011, 08:34:18 AM by Kazaa »
Logged



"If you learn from defeat, you haven't really lost."

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #21 on: March 10, 2011, 08:33:02 AM »
Quote from: Kazaa on March 10, 2011, 08:32:11 AM
The Spitfire's 3D model has definitely started to show its age rather quickly. Especially when the standard of detail for new/updated planes seem to increase every year.

 :(
Logged
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #22 on: March 10, 2011, 10:11:51 AM »
cough yak cough macchi
Logged
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline BaDkaRmA158Th

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2542
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #23 on: March 10, 2011, 03:17:45 PM »
I wish HTC would just hire a few more people to rework some of these older models faster, and bring many of the older "updated" models all to a single line of graphics.

You can change from plane to plane and literally see the 2001-2008-2010 .ect updates. But right now NO ONE can say aces high is the best looking flight sim they have played, and how could they when some core parts of the game are simply put, "10 years old."


I cannot understand for the life of me, how this is acceptable.
Logged
~383Rd RTC/CH BW/AG~
BaDfaRmA

My signature says "Our commitment to diplomacy will never inhibit our willingness to kick a$s."

Offline Ugly05

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #24 on: March 11, 2011, 07:33:19 AM »
Logged

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #25 on: March 11, 2011, 12:53:36 PM »
Quote from: BaDkaRmA158Th on March 10, 2011, 03:17:45 PM

I cannot understand for the life of me, how this is acceptable.

If I were you, I would quit.


wrongway
Logged
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline USAFPilot

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #26 on: March 12, 2011, 07:32:17 AM »
I think the C-47 needs reworked! Have you seen that thing? It's ugly!  :noid :bhead

USAFPilot
Logged
Though I fly through the Valley of Death, I shall fear no evil, for I am 80,000 feet and climbing.

Offline USAFPilot

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #27 on: March 12, 2011, 07:33:46 AM »
Have you noticed there is one unnesscery plane on Aces High II. The Boston III and the A-20G.  :lol

USAFPilot
Logged
Though I fly through the Valley of Death, I shall fear no evil, for I am 80,000 feet and climbing.

Offline HawkerMKII

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1133
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #28 on: March 12, 2011, 08:22:17 AM »
Quote from: USAFPilot on March 12, 2011, 07:33:46 AM
Have you noticed there is one unnesscery plane on Aces High II. The Boston III and the A-20G.  :lol

USAFPilot

Sorry but your wrong there, the 2 would be 262 and 163.
Logged
8th of November 1965, 173RD Airborne <S>

Offline USAFPilot

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: Rework: C-47 & Me 163
« Reply #29 on: March 12, 2011, 10:53:18 AM »
No they are different. They were made by MESSERCHIMET but one was a rocket and one was a jet.

USAFPilot
Logged
Though I fly through the Valley of Death, I shall fear no evil, for I am 80,000 feet and climbing.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »