sea wave lengths

[lulu]

Could we have a more long  sea wave length?


 

[Rino]

     Lot of time on your hands?

[lulu]

I suppose that it is just a parameter to change.


 

[gyrene81]

so, to add to the heavy graphics already in game...lulu wants to toss in waves   



i have to ask lulu, are you a teenager with nothing better to do at night but think about things without actually thinking about them?

[kvuo75]

we already have waves gyrene, i think he just wants it to look less like a swimming pool and more like a sea.

[EskimoJoe]

so, to add to the heavy graphics already in game...lulu wants to toss in waves   



i have to ask lulu, are you a teenager with nothing better to do at night but think about things without actually thinking about them?

Maybe you yourself should start thinking. Not everybody on these forums, or in this world,
is from the USA. AFAIK Engrish isn't Lulu's first language. Lay off. It was a good OP in the
proper section.

+1 to the OP, in due time. Heavy seas at some point in the future would be nice.

[Tyrannis]

Maybe you yourself should start thinking. Not everybody on these forums, or in this world,
is from the USA. AFAIK Engrish isn't Lulu's first language. Lay off. It was a good OP in the
proper section.

+1 to the OP, in due time. Heavy seas at some point in the future would be nice.

+1 to this

and +1 to the idea, be cool to add types a wave patterns to the game,maybe random whirlpools&such? so we can replicate poc:at worlds end mailstrum battle for epicness 


but on a more serious note, yes to waves how about adding in reefs & maybe Some animals. (like say, a whale that follows the TF and surfaces sometimes. wouldnt contribute anything, just add to the scenary)

[lulu]

Just waves length, not waves amplitude - perhaps a small introduction of a set of different
amplitude could be good too.

I think that HTC has experimented a bit before to choose waves length and amplitude but after many weeks ideas could change.


 



p.s.

My pc's performance is poor (as Skuzzy  said  ) so i don't want to see any dramatically changes in AH requirements as many of you.

I think that waves length is just a simple value parameter in AH and perhaps a more long wave length could have a positive impact on frame rete. 

[gyrene81]

Maybe you yourself should start thinking. Not everybody on these forums, or in this world,
is from the USA. AFAIK Engrish isn't Lulu's first language. Lay off. It was a good OP in the
proper section.

+1 to the OP, in due time. Heavy seas at some point in the future would be nice.

uh huh...i know english isn't lulu's native language...and no   

my retort had to do with lulu posting some wacky ideas like tyrannis does once in a while...as if it was a dream that woke him up in the middle of the night and he posts it without actually thinking about it

Just waves length, not waves amplitude - perhaps a small introduction of a set of different
amplitude could be good too.

I think that HTC has experimented a bit before to choose waves length and amplitude but after many weeks ideas could change.

 

p.s.

My pc's performance is poor (as Skuzzy  said  ) so i don't want to see any dramatically changes in AH requirements as many of you.

I think that waves length is just a simple value parameter in AH and perhaps a more long wave length could have a positive impact on frame rete. 

now i understand lulu, thank you for clearing it up...i have detailed water turned on so i see ripples on the water, not exactly waves but not smooth as glass either...it's just a texture effect...with detailed water turned off, the water has no texture...and i believe if your system is a poor performer you have detailed water turned off, so you may not see waves either...unless they are along the shore line as an actual 3d effect...like the wake behind ships/boats

[lulu]

I can see this:

  w. length
  ------
 /\     /\
/  \   /  \
     \/     \
      ------

also if detailed water is off.


I asked if it could be possible to have longer wave length - see picture above.

 

[B-17]

+1 to the OP, in due time. Heavy seas at some point in the future would be nice.

yeah, i think so too. it would really mess up the naval gunners aim, wouldn't it now? what witht the pitcing and tossing of the seas? and... are i say it... submarines ollowing the TG too?

[guncrasher]

Maybe you yourself should start thinking. Not everybody on these forums, or in this world,
is from the USA. AFAIK Engrish isn't Lulu's first language. Lay off. It was a good OP in the
proper section.

+1 to the OP, in due time. Heavy seas at some point in the future would be nice.

lulu is from california. he has said it many times.  close to san francisco if i may say.

semp

[JOACH1M]

+1 for sea mammals!!

[AWwrgwy]

lulu is from california. he has said it many times.  close to san francisco if i may say.

semp

 

because post count is important

wrongway

[LLogann]

lulu, as far as I know we don't have any active sonar ingame.  So although you are correct, the wavelengths are long under the surface, I don't think we should be wasting any time making adjustments to them.   

Could we have a more long  sea wave length?