Author Topic: AT&T/T-Mobile merger  (Read 2369 times)

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #15 on: March 21, 2011, 03:28:37 PM »
They pay nicely for maintenance services too..... mowing, weed eating, etc.

I have to argue on that one. A few years back, I was helping out a rancher on improving his grazing land. His biggest problem is infestation of cedar trees and no burning. The reason is that of cellphone tower on his land. The company will not do any maintenance and limited the rancher to burn.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Killer91

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 801
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #16 on: March 21, 2011, 03:29:23 PM »
Ah i seeee.. This makes a little more sense now. I'm all for it cause AT&T coverage SUCKS around here. IDK if T-Mobile's network is any better but it can't possibly hurt the cell coverage around here. I'd let em put a tower in my yard just so I could have reliable service. Kinda sucks living inside town(granted I'm about 100ft from the city limits) and not getting service at my house  :bhead
someone named pervert is thanking someone named badboy for a enjoyable night?

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #17 on: March 21, 2011, 03:31:17 PM »
I MAY JUST HAVE to switch to verizon now......i like t-mobile.....but i can only see them going down hill from this.....at&t sucks

I cannot use Verizon as there is a dead space circling my house about 300 yards in diameter, with my house being the centerpoint.

I am screwed now.  T-Mobile service has been great for us and the customer support has been top notch as well.  I am really screwed.
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline Shuffler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27070
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #18 on: March 21, 2011, 03:43:05 PM »
I cannot use Verizon as there is a dead space circling my house about 300 yards in diameter, with my house being the centerpoint.

I am screwed now.  T-Mobile service has been great for us and the customer support has been top notch as well.  I am really screwed.

AT&T was terrible back around 9 to 12 years back. I have the number of our business contact now. I had a single issue to clarify. I called their regular service and was switched around then put on hold for a long time. I finally hung up and was getting really pisssed off. One of my secretaries gave me another number. It is our business contact for AT&T. He was on it and had the issue rectified in less than 5 minutes.

I have to think their individual service is still way below what most would find acceptable.
80th FS "Headhunters"

S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning In A Bottle)

Offline Ardy123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3417
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #19 on: March 21, 2011, 03:45:08 PM »
Ah i seeee.. This makes a little more sense now. I'm all for it cause AT&T coverage SUCKS around here. IDK if T-Mobile's network is any better but it can't possibly hurt the cell coverage around here. I'd let em put a tower in my yard just so I could have reliable service. Kinda sucks living inside town(granted I'm about 100ft from the city limits) and not getting service at my house  :bhead

Although T-Mobile and At&T are both GSM cell providers they operate on different frequencies, often phones have to be made with different chips that cell to AT&T than the ones sold to T-Mable. The Nexus-one is the first one that comes to mind.
Yeah, that's right, you just got your rear handed to you by a fuggly puppet!
==Army of Muppets==
(Bunnies)

Offline CAP1

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22287
      • The Axis Vs Allies Arena
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #20 on: March 21, 2011, 03:56:16 PM »
AT&T was terrible back around 9 to 12 years back. I have the number of our business contact now. I had a single issue to clarify. I called their regular service and was switched around then put on hold for a long time. I finally hung up and was getting really pisssed off. One of my secretaries gave me another number. It is our business contact for AT&T. He was on it and had the issue rectified in less than 5 minutes.

I have to think their individual service is still way below what most would find acceptable.

my mom is on at&t, as is my brother. brother doesn't complain about it...although he gets a lot of dropped calls....and can't even talk on his phone in his house.....mom complains about it all the time. with t-mobile, i can talki inside his house....and mine...even in the basement for that matter.
ingame 1LTCAP
80th FS "Headhunters"
S.A.P.P.- Secret Association Of P-38 Pilots (Lightning in a Bottle)

Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #21 on: March 21, 2011, 04:01:52 PM »
I've had T-mobile for about 5 years, good coverage in my area and great customer service.  The one time I felt like the t-mobile sales associate kind of misled me, I called up t-mobile and they altered my plan and took off all the previous months' charges from the misunderstanding.  If you call, you're almost guaranteed an extra 50 anytime minutes it seems.
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Folks, play nice.

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27251
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #22 on: March 21, 2011, 04:08:13 PM »
They both suck.

Verizon FTW!  :aok

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #23 on: March 21, 2011, 04:32:28 PM »
Verizon left a bad taste in my mouth when, after arguing about the coverage issues I was having, they sent a truck out and tested and found my complaint to be legit, and when we dropped the service, they refused to allow us to take our phone number with us, citing the service worked in other areas.
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline ROX

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2209
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #24 on: March 21, 2011, 05:21:39 PM »
We've never had problems with AT&T mobile.   

We used to have to go out on the back deck to make calls when we lived in an RF "hole".  Keep in mind that low areas (in terms of HAAT, or height above average terrain) as well as areas that are surrounded by high, dense folliage--read that trees--are susceptible to bad connectivity.

While a transmitted RF signal at Low Frequency--LF, Medium Frequency--MW, High Frequency--HF, and VHF could care less about buildings and trees, UHF starts to get bad and all the cell phone bands 900 mHZ up to 10 GHZ are highly affected by it.  Placement of the cell towers is also a factor.  Keep in mind that your cell phone transmits a signal of 500 mW (typical), or basically 5 times the strength as your garage door opener (100 mW).  That's not exactly big-time RF.  While a ham radio operator can take that same 500 mW and communicate with the South Pole on Morse Code or digital computer modes at 14.030 mHZ HF (with a high gain antenna with height)...that same 500 mW at cell phone frequencies--also known as "microwave" frequencies doesn't have a lot of poop, and much less with heavy foliage and a low location--at least "low" in the eyes of the closest cell tower.  There's only so much you can do with 500 mW and basically a glorified vertical dipole antenna...and it gets worse when people use a phone in anything other that a vertical position when on the cell tower's fringe.

I am lucky now.  We moved to a nice mountainside home about 350' above the rest of the town around us and there are 2 cell towers--both we are far higher up than.  We have 5 bars everywhere we go except 30 miles away in a major deadspot (no towers).  Outside of that, we are rock solid everywhere we go.  We go down to the shelter below the house (surrounded by concrete) and still be solid 5 bars.


Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #25 on: March 21, 2011, 05:33:49 PM »
Verizon left a bad taste in my mouth when, after arguing about the coverage issues I was having, they sent a truck out and tested and found my complaint to be legit, and when we dropped the service, they refused to allow us to take our phone number with us, citing the service worked in other areas.

There customer service is the worst.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline AAJagerX

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2339
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #26 on: March 21, 2011, 05:38:46 PM »
I cannot use Verizon as there is a dead space circling my house about 300 yards in diameter, with my house being the centerpoint.

I am screwed now.  T-Mobile service has been great for us and the customer support has been top notch as well.  I am really screwed.

I have a feeling that AT&T is buying T-Mobile to use their 4g network.  They'll in all likelyhood use T-Mobile's former towers and networks.  That's what AT&T did when they bought Cingular.  You'll probably be fine as far as reception goes.  Their customer service is ok, not as good as Sprint but much better than Verizon.
AAJagerX - XO - AArchAAngelz

trainers.hitechcreations.com

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22408
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #27 on: March 21, 2011, 06:54:07 PM »
I have a feeling that AT&T is buying T-Mobile to use their 4g network.  They'll in all likelihood use T-Mobile's former towers and networks.  That's what AT&T did when they bought Cingular.  You'll probably be fine as far as reception goes.  Their customer service is ok, not as good as Sprint but much better than Verizon.

Here's some inside information.    T-Mobile does NOT have 4G, they piggy backed on a brew-haha last year when Sprint and others "claimed they had 4G, but also did not".   T-Mobile said "Screw it, rename our 3G.....4G".    The problem is, now Verizon has the largest 4G coverage, then AT&T and Sprint following in 3rd.   T-Mobile still has 3G and it is night and day between the two speeds.

It is not conjecture, they (T-Mobile) do NOT have 4G.  

We just left Sprint after 13 years last month.   Verizon is superior, in both Customer Service and Coverage.   I also like my DroidX.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2011, 07:01:09 PM by Masherbrum »
-=Most Wanted=-

FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline SkiMan

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 116
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #28 on: March 21, 2011, 08:07:58 PM »
Here's some inside information.    T-Mobile does NOT have 4G, they piggy backed on a brew-haha last year when Sprint and others "claimed they had 4G, but also did not".   T-Mobile said "Screw it, rename our 3G.....4G".    The problem is, now Verizon has the largest 4G coverage, then AT&T and Sprint following in 3rd.   T-Mobile still has 3G and it is night and day between the two speeds.

It is not conjecture, they (T-Mobile) do NOT have 4G.  

We just left Sprint after 13 years last month.   Verizon is superior, in both Customer Service and Coverage.   I also like my DroidX.

Well, then according to the ITU, Verizons LTE isn't 4G either.  Semantics really.  True 4G would be 100mbs which hasn't been achieved
commercially. Typically, what the carriers (read: ALL CARRIERS, not just T-mobile) are referring to as 4G is somewhere between 6mbs
to 12mbs real world. ( HSPA+ ) which is T-mobiles "4G" is pretty much comparable to Verizon's LTE or Sprints WiMax.
Although I think Sprint was at the lower end of that spectrum.

 


Formerly Skiman and 613Ski

Currently flying as Pariah

Offline AAJagerX

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2339
Re: AT&T/T-Mobile merger
« Reply #29 on: March 22, 2011, 01:51:38 AM »
Here's some inside information.    T-Mobile does NOT have 4G, they piggy backed on a brew-haha last year when Sprint and others "claimed they had 4G, but also did not".   T-Mobile said "Screw it, rename our 3G.....4G".    The problem is, now Verizon has the largest 4G coverage, then AT&T and Sprint following in 3rd.   T-Mobile still has 3G and it is night and day between the two speeds.

It is not conjecture, they (T-Mobile) do NOT have 4G.  

We just left Sprint after 13 years last month.   Verizon is superior, in both Customer Service and Coverage.   I also like my DroidX.

Good to know.  Either way, Skuzzy will still have cell coverage.   :D

3g to 4g is all junk anyway...  It's just bandwidth.  
I used to deal with these systems every darn day (sprint blackberry enterprise servers and networks).  Before you ask...  Yes, Research In Motion sucks.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2011, 01:57:50 AM by AAJagerX »
AAJagerX - XO - AArchAAngelz

trainers.hitechcreations.com