I'm merely continuing the thoughts of this post:
We are not discussing a victimless crime here however, such as drunk in public, growing a pot plant or running a red light. We are discussing arguably the scourge of America, and not just the use but production thereof, and by a teacher no less.
He is blindly assuming something that has been proven false.
Well guess what? I am blindly following the logical response.
As I stated, what if this was said on the open internet about a family member of his / hers? What kind of response would he /her give?
I'm giving a response that would be expected form an insult that is beyond repulsive. My response is repulsive, emotional, and improbable. Do I in real life wish physical harm to someone I don't know, will never know, and don't care to know? no.
You actually made me realise I fell into that ridiculous trap that is an internet troll.
I do still stand by my response. He wanted one, and I gave it. I hope he dives into a bag of noodlees, and rabid badgers; then dies so we can pee on his grave. Know that I intend this fate for the online persona "DREDger".
Do I hope "John Smith" actually befalls this disgraceful death? No. I don't know him, don't want to, and hopefully never will. See you can hope / wish harm on an artificial being, an avatar if you will. I can hope / wish the most disgusting thing on an artificial being all I want and there is nothing wrong with that. It makes me feel better, but as I alluded to earlier to it actually makes the troll feel better to. For that I am disappointed, but my comments still hold true in this context.