Author Topic: Strafing B-26??  (Read 2766 times)

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
Strafing B-26??
« on: April 22, 2011, 07:18:09 AM »
Our B-26 packs some good forward firepower, but was the Marauder ever used for strafing? I've always considered the B-26 as a mid-alt bomber, I can't think of any occasions were its 5x.50's would come in handy!
If so, is there any more information about it?



Thanks!
« Last Edit: April 22, 2011, 07:21:08 AM by frank3 »

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2011, 07:28:04 AM »
I think in the Pacific everything was used for strafing.

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2011, 08:29:59 AM »
I think in the Pacific everything was used for strafing.

Someone correct me if I am wrong, but the B26 was supposed to replace the A20, and be able to do strafing attacks, shallow dive bomb, and level bomb better.  All the while being faster, having a better climb rate, and better defensive guns.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2011, 09:04:22 AM by SmokinLoon »
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9494
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2011, 09:50:06 AM »
I think in the Pacific everything was used for strafing.


There were some early B-26s based out of Port Moresby in New Guinea during 1942.  They may have been used for strafing, although I think that was very incidental.  The strafer B-25s weren't developed until early 1943, and had their first big test at the Battle of Bismarck Sea in March of that year.  I believe all of the B26s had been withdrawn from the Pacific by then.

I've never heard B-26s being used on strafing missions anywhere else.

- oldman

Offline Soulyss

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6559
      • Aces High Events
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2011, 10:08:40 AM »
I think in the Pacific everything was used for strafing.

I can't say for certain yet, but I don't think B-26's were used in this way in the SW Pacific the 22nd BG was based in Australia and flying some of the early missions to Rabaul, they would fly up stage out of Port Moresby then hit Rabaul and come back.  The raids were pretty small and the low level skip bombing techniques hadn't been developed yet (if memory serves the first skip bombing attack was made by a B-17 in Simpson Harbor at night) so I would be surprised if the B-26 did any low level strafing attacks, they were just starting to figure out that medium and high altitude bombardment wasn't going to kill shipping quite as easily as some of the theorists said it would during the pre-war years.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2011, 11:21:04 AM by Soulyss »
80th FS "Headhunters"
I blame mir.

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10687
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2011, 11:12:00 AM »
Best B-26 Strafing story I am aware of. No blister packs on there 26's though.




Offline Rebel

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 734
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2011, 11:42:25 AM »
Yes.

My great uncle flew them- he preferred the A-26 over the B-26, but they did strafe quite a bit, from what I remember of his stories.
"You rebel scum"

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2011, 11:56:21 AM »
Someone correct me if I am wrong, but the B26 was supposed to replace the A20, and be able to do strafing attacks, shallow dive bomb, and level bomb better.  All the while being faster, having a better climb rate, and better defensive guns.

A-26 was the plane designed to replace the A-20, not the B-26 Marauder.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Delirium

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7276
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2011, 12:01:06 PM »
In the Pacific, a lot of things were done differently.



http://www.johngreavesart.ca/b26.htm

edit: it looks like Lyric beat me to it.
Delirium
80th "Headhunters"
Retired AH Trainer (but still teach the P38 selectively)

I found an air leak in my inflatable sheep and plugged the hole! Honest!

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #9 on: April 22, 2011, 12:34:05 PM »
What else would the purpose of the guns be?
Even the B25 was used for strafing
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9494
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #10 on: April 22, 2011, 01:56:50 PM »
What else would the purpose of the guns be?
Even the B25 was used for strafing


ESPECIALLY the B-25 was used for strafing!  That was the plane that invented it, really (well...you know what I mean).

For some reason B-26s just weren't used in the Pacific after early 1943.  I imagine that the later B-26s - the ones with the cheek gun packs - were so equipped so that they COULD be used for strafing if the opportunity presented itself.  In the ETO it generally did not.  Early attempts by A-20s to mimic the low-level attacks which were so successful in the Pacific proved disastrous against the much better ground fire which existed in Europe.

- oldman

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #11 on: April 22, 2011, 02:08:25 PM »
Whether it did or not, they clearly built them with the ability. You look back and even the Boston III has 3x .303 nose guns. It was self defense as well, to ward off any of the common head-on attacks, which were effective against level bombers with glass, unarmored, nose areas.

4x .50s in the snout will discourage HO runs, no doubt?

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #12 on: April 22, 2011, 06:09:08 PM »
A HO attack is a hard one on a fast aircraft. But a good point, - if the other head has teeth....
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline ScottyK

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 463
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #13 on: April 22, 2011, 07:55:58 PM »
In the Pacific, a lot of things were done differently.

(Image removed from quote.)

http://www.johngreavesart.ca/b26.htm

edit: it looks like Lyric beat me to it.
 

 if i remember correctly the gentleman who flew that planes lives here in billings MT, not 100% certain, i'll have to go check.
Childhood is over the moment you know your gonna die.  Fight not to Fail, or end up like the others.   In my crate, im the commander.


IGN: Scotty57

Offline EagleDNY

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1514
Re: Strafing B-26??
« Reply #14 on: April 22, 2011, 07:58:46 PM »
The interesting thing I see (that i never knew) was that the B-26 could be armed with a torpedo.