Author Topic: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)  (Read 1075 times)

Offline Citabria

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5149
the origional puffy flak had actual ballistics and travel time for the bullets. I miss it can we have it back in a for that will work for carrier groups?

I remember the problem was the origional coad would just make a big black cloud above the cv group. surely this can be corrected with the current level of programming experience.


no one likes the current ai puffy flak random world of warcraft rng dice box except programmers who don't want to be bothered changing it.
Fester was my in game name until September 2013

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2011, 11:22:27 PM »
I don't ever recall early versions having ballistics. Even back in the 1.4 days I recall puffy ack following my HQ-run lancs far too long and far out of sight behind mountains and such.

Seems rather like we have it now over the megastrats and CVs. I also wish HTC would just code ballistics into it [like you say], solve the problem.

Offline Scotty55OEFVet

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 628
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2011, 12:43:42 AM »
All I know is I am sick of diving at 450+ to ht somethin on a field and WHAM, first shot form any ack (CV Group, Field) either rips a wing off or PWs me so bad I might as well bail. All im saying is tone it down because Ack WAS NOT THAT ACCURATE AT ANYTIME. Ty  :salute
"War can only be abolished through war...in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun."



RedDevil

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2011, 02:20:06 AM »
Scotty, it was more so, if you're talking about the cannon rounds. It's the puffy ack we dislike.

In real life a group of tempests running at full speed with surprise on their side made one pass over a German field. Of the entire flight, the leader looked back and found only 2 made it through the fire to the other side!


The gun fire was quite lethal. It's the 88mm and/or the 5" puffy that's not very realistic right now.

Offline pervert

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2011, 06:01:11 AM »
+1 current puffy ack kills gameplay and players engaging in combat with other players, no one wants to pay a sub to constantly get nerfed by AI

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2011, 06:52:17 AM »
the current puf ack will kill your hub cannon quite easily  :noid

I don't want my fights to be constantly ruined by some unrealistic AI insta kill thingy
now posting as SirNuke

Offline ozrocker

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3640
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2011, 06:58:17 AM »
Scotty, it was more so, if you're talking about the cannon rounds. It's the puffy ack we dislike.

In real life a group of tempests running at full speed with surprise on their side made one pass over a German field. Of the entire flight, the leader looked back and found only 2 made it through the fire to the other side!


The gun fire was quite lethal. It's the 88mm and/or the 5" puffy that's not very realistic right now.
That sounds like "Typhoon Squadron",lol (Think that's what the name of that old movie is called)
I believe with David McCallum?

                                                                                                                               <S> Oz
Flying and dying since Tour 29
The world is grown so bad. That wrens make prey where eagles dare not perch.- Shakespeare
 
30% Disabled Vet  US ARMY- 11C2H 2/32 AR. 3rd AD, 3/67AR. 2nd AD, 2/64 AR. 3rd ID, ABGD Command TRADOC, 1/16th INF. 1st ID

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2011, 07:31:31 AM »
no one likes the current ai puffy flak random world of warcraft rng dice box except programmers who don't want to be bothered changing it.

Nice touch ... :aok
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline hitech

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 12425
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2011, 08:06:09 AM »
No


P.S.

You remember incorrectly.

HiTech

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #9 on: May 14, 2011, 12:33:21 PM »
No


P.S.

You remember incorrectly.

HiTech
owned
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline grizz441

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7001
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #10 on: May 14, 2011, 12:58:20 PM »
I bet every player in the game hates puffy ack.

Defensive side: It sucks/is unreliable.  You can't drag bad guys to the puffy ack, it's "just there", maybe it will help you maybe it will kill you, who the heck knows.  It's completely random if it will shoot a bad guy on your tail or just shoot you.  Field ack on the other hand, has value for the defender, as you can seek refuge in the ack when needed.  It actually acts as a surefire defense.

Offensive side:  Obviously it's garbage.  No one wants to get shot by some random damage generator every time you go above a "magic altitude".

Other than the historical immersion of puffy, how does it make game play better for anyone?  Does the immersion really outweigh game play in this case?

Offline kvuo75

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3003
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #11 on: May 14, 2011, 03:19:20 PM »
I bet every player in the game hates puffy ack.

Defensive side: It sucks/is unreliable.  You can't drag bad guys to the puffy ack, it's "just there", maybe it will help you maybe it will kill you, who the heck knows.  It's completely random if it will shoot a bad guy on your tail or just shoot you.  Field ack on the other hand, has value for the defender, as you can seek refuge in the ack when needed.  It actually acts as a surefire defense.

Offensive side:  Obviously it's garbage.  No one wants to get shot by some random damage generator every time you go above a "magic altitude".

Other than the historical immersion of puffy, how does it make game play better for anyone?  Does the immersion really outweigh game play in this case?

I dont think so, if immersion is the reason to have it, just make it not do any damage.
kvuo75

Kill the manned ack.

Offline Lab Rat 3947

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1023
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #12 on: May 14, 2011, 10:12:09 PM »
As far as its immersion factor, I like it.

In the 5 months I have been online, I have been shot down once, damaged two or three times, and saved once by puffy ack.

To me it's just part of the war.

Just my $0.02  :old:

LtngRydr
14th FG Grounded

80th FS "Headhunters"

Offline Scotty55OEFVet

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 628
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #13 on: May 15, 2011, 01:47:12 AM »
Scotty, it was more so, if you're talking about the cannon rounds. It's the puffy ack we dislike.

In real life a group of tempests running at full speed with surprise on their side made one pass over a German field. Of the entire flight, the leader looked back and found only 2 made it through the fire to the other side!


The gun fire was quite lethal. It's the 88mm and/or the 5" puffy that's not very realistic right now.

Im not doubting that it was accurate as you say, but about a year ago I did some research on the subject and was astonished by the amount of rounds fired to plane's downed ratio. I will try to find it again, I just think flyin on the fringe's of a CV group at 15k and the first round fired at me blows my wing off...well that is a little ridiculous. Thank you for tellin me that though cuz it does make me understand a bit more  :salute
"War can only be abolished through war...in order to get rid of the gun it is necessary to take up the gun."



RedDevil

Offline iron650

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 662
Re: can we have Version 1 puffy ack again? (pre carrier group)
« Reply #14 on: May 15, 2011, 06:12:53 PM »
Im not doubting that it was accurate as you say, but about a year ago I did some research on the subject and was astonished by the amount of rounds fired to plane's downed ratio. I will try to find it again, I just think flyin on the fringe's of a CV group at 15k and the first round fired at me blows my wing off...well that is a little ridiculous. Thank you for tellin me that though cuz it does make me understand a bit more  :salute

I've never been hit that hard. The last time that happened was by 37 or 40mm ack. The puffy ack shook my aircraft and destroyed my flaps I believe.  :uhoh  :airplane: