Author Topic: P-38 turnfight  (Read 7626 times)

Offline mthrockmor

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2649
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #105 on: June 10, 2011, 04:55:36 PM »
When I see a -38 I first lick my lips, all the while wondering if they are with the 80th. The Headhunters as a unit have come to grips with the -38. There are some incredible -38 sticks to include my squadie 8Spade. He will embarrass most pilots. Also, Soulyss. You will think they are cheating. If you want to learn the -38 look those two up. A few others will be mentioned but learn from the best.

Boo
No poor dumb bastard wins a war by dying for his country, he wins by making the other poor, dumb, bastard die for his.
George "Blood n Guts" Patton

Offline df54

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 189
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #106 on: June 10, 2011, 05:04:23 PM »
 

  "P-38 details: data and information pertinent to virtual modeling"
by David C. Copley, last updated 30 May 2009


      google this site.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #107 on: June 10, 2011, 05:07:47 PM »
Widewing,

Correct me if I am wrong, but shouldn't the dive recovery flaps on the J and L behave exactly the same?

The J doesn't have them....
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #108 on: June 10, 2011, 05:37:18 PM »
The J doesn't have them....
Ah.  I was unaware of that.  I thought they were pretty much the same plane other than the boosted ailerons on the L.

I make no pretenses of being knowledgeable about P-38.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #109 on: June 10, 2011, 06:21:48 PM »
Ah.  I was unaware of that.  I thought they were pretty much the same plane other than the boosted ailerons on the L.

I make no pretenses of being knowledgeable about P-38.

Our P-38J is probably a P-38J-15-Lo, it could be a P-38J-5-Lo, or even a P-38J-20-Lo, Pyro would have to give us the exact model, he may have already somewhere. The first P-38J with dive flaps from the factory was the P-38J-25-Lo, which for AH purposes is considered equivalent to the P-38L-5-Lo we have, because AH II does not model the Allison Lockheed power settings for the -30 Allison in the P-38L, which would be 64" of manifold pressure, and 3200 RPM.
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #110 on: June 10, 2011, 09:47:43 PM »
Widewing,

Correct me if I am wrong, but shouldn't the dive recovery flaps on the J and L behave exactly the same?

The J doesn't have power assisted controls either for what it's worth.  The L has all the bells and whistles.  In the end the L got there for the most after the air to air war for the 38 was over.  In the PTO, MTO and ETO the 38s spent their time ground pounding and lacking air to air targets from October 44 on when the Ls showed up.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline TwinBoom

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2960
      • 39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #111 on: June 11, 2011, 09:57:29 AM »
The J doesn't have power assisted controls either for what it's worth.  The L has all the bells and whistles.  In the end the L got there for the most after the air to air war for the 38 was over.  In the PTO, MTO and ETO the 38s spent their time ground pounding and lacking air to air targets from October 44 on when the Ls showed up.

All the more reason to add the 38-H as its the most common Bird in combat :)
TBs Sounds 
39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"NOSEART

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #112 on: June 11, 2011, 01:00:28 PM »
All the more reason to add the 38-H as its the most common Bird in combat :)

Actually the G was, but whose counting :)
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline TwinBoom

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2960
      • 39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #113 on: June 11, 2011, 01:17:25 PM »
Actually the G was, but whose counting :)


Shhhh you are salting my game  :lol
TBs Sounds 
39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"NOSEART

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #114 on: June 11, 2011, 07:42:26 PM »
Ah.  I was unaware of that.  I thought they were pretty much the same plane other than the boosted ailerons on the L.

I make no pretenses of being knowledgeable about P-38.

At least the J model we have doesn't have the boosted ailerons or dive flaps. Late model Js, starting with the P-38J-25-L0, did receive the boosted aileron and dive flap upgrade. 

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #115 on: June 12, 2011, 09:07:55 PM »
Actually the G was, but whose counting :)

Really? Was that in the Pacific, and the Mediterranean?

I thought the 20th and 55th started with the H model in October of 1943.
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe


Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #116 on: June 12, 2011, 09:44:51 PM »
Really? Was that in the Pacific, and the Mediterranean?

I thought the 20th and 55th started with the H model in October of 1943.

The H's were the first in the ETO, but were quickly replaced by the Js.

In the MTO they got the ETO hand me down Hs.  They were still flying G models well into 44 in the MTO.  The 82nd FG had a 38F named "Sad Sack" that was in combat for 17 months, flew 184 missions and had 16 planes to it's credit, finally being retired at the end of May 44 after taking a flak hit to the nose.  About 1100 G models built with about 600 Hs, 600 Fs.  In terms of air combat in the Pacific, it really was prime time in 43.  They certainly were still shooting stuff in 44 but not at the rate they were claiming in 43.  This is the same in the MTO.

I suppose in were talking about ground attack too, it might be closer, but the air to air stuff was the early birds and the G had the largest production run
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline drgondog

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 326
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #117 on: June 17, 2011, 06:11:25 PM »
The J doesn't have them....
Corey - IIRC the J-25 and above had them but if you are referring to AH version I have no clue
Nicholas Boileau "Honor is like an island, rugged and without shores; once we have left it, we can never return"

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #118 on: June 17, 2011, 10:50:33 PM »
Corey - IIRC the J-25 and above had them but if you are referring to AH version I have no clue

The AH J doesn't.  They were retrofitted to some J-15s too I believe and standard with the J-25 on.  I believe the AH 38J is a J-10
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline drgondog

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 326
Re: P-38 turnfight
« Reply #119 on: June 18, 2011, 07:02:17 AM »
The AH J doesn't.  They were retrofitted to some J-15s too I believe and standard with the J-25 on.  I believe the AH 38J is a J-10

I believe you are correct - the ill fated loss (ship?) had kits for service Centers at 8th AF designated for -10 and above and the -25 was first production block change with the flaps.
Nicholas Boileau "Honor is like an island, rugged and without shores; once we have left it, we can never return"