if we go by your opinion then baldeagle should give krupnski 4 trys at that 1 round where he did not post a film for the 1 round he lost, is this what you want?
No I never said no such thing. If I misunderstood what you meant then I misunderstood. I run a successful business, graduated college, and served 24 years as a leader of soldiers, and am quite confident in my reading comprehension. What I said is that the win/lose column should reflect who actually won or lost the fights not be based on a technicality. I'm not sure where you get this 4 fights for one issue out of anything I said. Clearly here you misunderstand me.
The double standard I argue is this; quite clearly. DrSpek did not post films of the fight lost. Krupinski did not post film of the fight he lost. DrSpek was forced to either redo the match or forfeit. The arguments have changed by many because the shoe is on the other foot. My argument has not changed from the previous bracket and that argument is this. The fact that "ALL" films were not posted should not determine the outcome of the match. That outcome should have been determined based on the ability of the best person on the night of the duel and who won, or lost, unless they cheated.
If you want to argue that the rules are applied differently because of the "reason" player X did not follow the rules OK, fair enough that is for BE to decide I would think. I would point out this tho, if you go back to the previous bracket thread you will see that the primary argument against DrSpek was because he did NOT follow the rules and post "ALL" films, the opinions on the "why" varied. So I ask you, do not the same rules apply here if player X does not follow the rules? I'm not going to repost all the rules here that apply, we have all seen them.
I will repeat, I do think Krupinski should retain the win. Same as I think DrSpek should have retained the win in the previous bracket. They both broke the same rule, the reason is immaterial. To argue differently is in my opinion; a double standard.
