well it is not like your squadmate jekyll and bunch of other many few members gave baldeagle an opportunity since ya'll plastered 10 plus pages the first time before baldeagle got home to respond and then have blasted this thread another 15 to 20 pages after baldeagle spoke the first time on the matter before he replyed again and now the many few have went and plastered another 4 to 5 pages or more after baldeagle posted a third time. so it must not matter what his ruling or decision is, it will never satisfy you many few. and how do you know if krupnski received a warning or not via private message, you dont know because it does not concern you
Majorizn, you point to one place where I ever said Krup didn't win the match? Point to one place where I said Krup didn't deserve the win. Point to one place where i ask the fight to be overturned. I never did in fact I stated several times that Krup deserved the win and i won't want to see it overturned. That is where so many have missed the whole argument because they are so quick to jump on the "look at me wagon" without ever taking a second to look at the issue I raised. Simply this; the rule that caused the whole thing should be removed. In fact the rule i pointed too affected the Few the same as it could have affected Krup so how in the world can the argument be for or against any squad or in defense of the Few?
Krup fought a good fight and deserved the win he is a heck of a player, I will say it again. But one thing for you and others to consider about this rule I ask to be looked at and removed is this; what happens if Krup has another failure in the next round and doesn't have film? As Kilz was so eager to point out to me, the rule is "Crystal" clear that two failures to follow the rules disqualifies you? Now I ask you; how stupid is that that someone could be disqualified for something as stupid as a accidentally hitting the cancel key, or a computer failure after fighting a great match? Why is it so important that any player has to be so darn worried about "filming" the match instead of worrying about fighting well and having a good time?
I plastered 10 pages because no one took a second to look at the issue I posted but decided because I am in a certain squad that the best and most popular thing to do is berate me instead so i defended myself. Admittedly in doing so I lost sight of the one thing i was trying to argue against and that is the stupid rule of having to film and turn in "all" films or risk losing the duel.
Yes BE tried to be fair, but by default fair is biased, like it or not. When you have to defend your position (I.E. BE) no matter how good you are your going to seem unfair to someone. Remove the rule and you remove the need to be "fair" and even go down that path. Two of seven matches have had this stupid debate because of this rule. I mean come on what does this rule really gain, for our viewing pleasure? With the rule any player risk losing the bracket for a stupid mistake or a computer malfunction. Without the rule at worst the player doesn't have film to defend their position (if they didn't film it) and they possibly lose. Which is the better option?
Krupinski, hats off to you for even sticking through all this bickering and BS. And hats off to BE for doing the same. But if anyone wants to attack me then do so on the merits of my argument, not simply because of the squad I'm in. For goodness sake, take a second to actually read what the heck my argument even was.