Well, well, well. Looky here. AH going through another genesis.
I have noticed some of the ankle brigade have deserted the "caps are good for the game" wagon even if only to call it temporary and blame it on the summer or the economy.
LOL at Kappas "what are we gonna do if the numbers go up"
having a large map during "off hours" will kill off the remaining non-American players. I hope it doesn't but the only thing that makes sense is to keep the boot option but swap the size of the map when the numbers call for it.
I really don't get your logic here. If I'm not mistaken, there has been one group or another that complains about every single map we have. My question is not directed at Bruv, but everyone who wants a small map at night because they don't like the large ones.
Why would you ask for more arena switches knowing they are pissing people off already, including many of you? Why don't you just ask for a special arena that has a map that suits you every time you're not happy with the selection offered?
Why didn't the Euro players jump ship years ago in single LW when they didnt like the late night map?
And again some of you have stumbled over the issue and failed to see the real problem and the possibility there might be another solution. That issue is the same one that allows conditions for hording to exist as well as being the problem you face at your peak times.
Without any base caps on players, every man on them map can go where ever he wants. People tend to either horde or milk run. There seems to be very little in between except during peak hours where you might have a few smaller groups working on their own.
During peak US times, it results in major hording and during peak Euro times there aren't enough to horde so you get sporadic engagements because people spread out too far killing any hope for decent size fights.
As long as were talking about numbers, I think every Euro player knows damn well that the arena switching caused a lot of players to just quit for the night because they didn't want to wait for numbers or deal with the switch. And you want to keep switching? I'm guessing you will see a 20 to 30% increase in numbers of players just because many will not decide to log off because of arena switch.
And that's not even half the issues and benefits of a base cap. Are you one to claim lag issues in the large furballs? Do I need say more?
Then there's the vastly different strategic game that would exist if an entire country weren't allowed to concentrate their forces at a single location. The list goes on, but I'm not going into all of it.
Don't even get me started about the "cesspool."
All in all, harsh as it might sound, Sunbat is right that the few people that are upset because they cant find good fights on large maps during peak Euro hours is the least of the problems. First thing you should do is endure the map rotation. It doesnt matter if you are for or against the split, you will there will always be times you can't have what you want. The second thing is realize that it's not the map that is the problem and start looking for solutions to the real problems.
htc has been pandering to the minority for too long already and yes it is selfish to ask for something that benefits a vastly smaller portion of the community if it has a negative effect on the majority.
We used to have 2 arenas during busy hours and 1 during the quiet hours.
Now you want to go the other way? 1 arena during the busy hours and 2 during the quiet hours?
I think we should take it further:
1000 people online: 1 arena
500 people online: 2 arenas
100 people online: 4 arenas
10 people online: 27 arenas
GOOD LORD, please don't give them any ideas.