Author Topic: Really Japan? REALLY?????  (Read 2518 times)

Offline kilo2

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3445
Re: Really Japan? REALLY?????
« Reply #60 on: June 19, 2011, 07:32:43 PM »
Meat from poop. THE FUTURE IS NOW!
X.O. Kommando Nowotny
FlyKommando.com

"Never abandon the possibility of attack."

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Really Japan? REALLY?????
« Reply #61 on: June 19, 2011, 07:38:21 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: June 20, 2011, 09:49:11 AM by Skuzzy »
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline F22RaptorDude

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3641
Re: Really Japan? REALLY?????
« Reply #62 on: June 19, 2011, 07:42:35 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: June 20, 2011, 09:49:22 AM by Skuzzy »
Reaper in a T-50-2 Scout tank in 10 seconds flat

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Really Japan? REALLY?????
« Reply #63 on: June 19, 2011, 07:53:35 PM »
No, not really.

The original story is a hoax. The person and the company do not exist. The Japanese dubbed into the original video does not match the person talking. It's pathetic that a supposed "news" organization would help propagate an internet hoax. Japanese and Chinese have been making video hoaxes about each other like this for years now. This was likely made in Taiwan in response to an earlier hoax video about Chinese making cooking oil from sewer water.
i can't help it, penguin's fault  :lol

remember roswell...weather balloon then, poopburger now.  :lol
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline F22RaptorDude

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3641
Re: Really Japan? REALLY?????
« Reply #64 on: June 19, 2011, 07:54:52 PM »
i can't help it, penguin's fault  :lol

remember roswell...weather balloon then, poopburger now.  :lol
I heard a stupid rumor that the UFO at roswell was a german hover air craft. People will believe some crazy stuff  :rofl
Reaper in a T-50-2 Scout tank in 10 seconds flat

Offline Penguin

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3089
Re: Really Japan? REALLY?????
« Reply #65 on: June 19, 2011, 08:15:18 PM »
See Rule #4
« Last Edit: June 20, 2011, 09:49:50 AM by Skuzzy »

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Really Japan? REALLY?????
« Reply #66 on: June 19, 2011, 08:31:25 PM »
 :rofl  come on penguin, you went hook, line and sinker..."rock on doctor mitsuyuki"...i just took the hook...poopburgers will never work.

wikipedia can only be a fair primary source of information if it is not misquoted with erroneous conjecture...remember that from now on.
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Penguin

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3089
Re: Really Japan? REALLY?????
« Reply #67 on: June 19, 2011, 09:03:29 PM »
What do you mean by only took the hook?

Why can it only be a fair source?  If it is properly cited it is just as accurate as any scholarly work.

-Penguin

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Really Japan? REALLY?????
« Reply #68 on: June 19, 2011, 09:37:02 PM »
ok just for fun penguin, compare the two links (thoroughly) and look for the differences...some are stark others are subtle.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Dust_Bowl.aspx

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust_Bowl

wikipedia should not be mistaken as a "scholarly work" or even the equal to scholarly work. there is little if any scholarly review and there are people like you editing it.

Quote
Of, relating to, or characteristic of scholars or scholarship

Quote
What is a Scholarly Article or Book?
A scholarly article or book generally is based on original research or experimentation. It is written by a researcher or expert in the field who is often affiliated with a college or university. Most scholarly writing includes footnotes and/or a bibliography and may include graphs or charts as illustrations as opposed to glossy pictures. In addition, articles that appear in scholarly journals or book that are published by academic presses, are subject to a peer-review process, which means that other "experts" or specialist in the field evaluate the quality and originality of the research as precondition of publication. The peer-review (as opposed to editorial review) process is also one thing that sets scholarly journals apart from journals that may otherwise seem quite similar. Journals such as Foreign Affairs, for instance, are generally not considers "scholarly journals," because many of the articles are solicited by the magazine's editors; in addition many of the articles are written by policy-makers who may be expressing an informed view, but whose article may not be based on original research.

Scholarly research is typically published by a academic association or a university/academic press. In international relations and comparative politics, representative scholarly journals include Asian Survey, Comparative Politics, International Organization, International Security Studies, Journal of Comparative Politics, Journal of Democracy, and World Politics
http://instructional1.calstatela.edu/tclim/definition_boxes/scholarly_article.htm
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline ozrocker

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3640
Re: Really Japan? REALLY?????
« Reply #69 on: June 19, 2011, 10:47:41 PM »
I get some pretty crappy tasting wannabe burgers sometimes.
Just go to any McDonald's



                                                                                                         :cheers: Oz
Flying and dying since Tour 29
The world is grown so bad. That wrens make prey where eagles dare not perch.- Shakespeare
 
30% Disabled Vet  US ARMY- 11C2H 2/32 AR. 3rd AD, 3/67AR. 2nd AD, 2/64 AR. 3rd ID, ABGD Command TRADOC, 1/16th INF. 1st ID

Offline Plawranc

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2683
      • Youtube Channel
Re: Really Japan? REALLY?????
« Reply #70 on: June 20, 2011, 04:15:13 AM »
This debate was pointless even if it wasn't a Hoax.

Penguin, your position was pointless. And Gyrene in my opinion won convincingly using your own method, statement of fact alone.

Now I can defeat your position by stating two facts.

1. The amount of money and skilled technicians required to institute such a technology in the future is nowhere near attainable.

2. The science of the matter is so new and experimental. It will take at least a decade of future refinement before ever being practical.

And now a little bit of philosiphy and truth.

Anything is possible with both time and money... And nothing is impossible, just lacking in methods to defeat the complication.

It is straight forward. This science... and all the other sciences you have spouted are simple matters of cause to effect on paper.
DaPacman - 71 Squadron RAF

"There are only two things that make life worth living. Fornication and Aviation"