Standardize Defensive Gunners on Bombers

[SmokinLoon]

It would be nice to know that every time I hit #2 that I'd hop into the tail gun, #3 I'd man the front gun, #4 the top turret, #5 the ball turret, #6/7 the wast gunners, etc.

I know some aircraft fall out of alignment with that request since they do not match exactly that pattern (Ju88, TBM, etc), but they would be the exception.  Right now, it appears that there is not much standardization.

Thoughts?   

[Lusche]

+1

[tmetal]

+1, if a plane doesn't have waist gunners for example just leave that number key empty

[Jayhawk]

+1

It would take some effort to re-learn the key combos, but would definitely be worth it.

[SmokinLoon]

+1, if a plane doesn't have waist gunners for example just leave that number key empty

My thoughts too.  

In the case of the Ju88, I'd apply the R/L waist gun #'s to the rear facing guns.

[Karnak]

Many years ago I posted such a request, including what I thought was the most comprehensive unified scheme.  It is something that would be helpful to the ability to fly different bombers.

[iron650]

+1

[bortas1]

+1 

[HighTone]

-1

I like those small differences.

[Jayhawk]

-1

I like those small differences.

I can understand indifference, but I'm curious what makes you like them.

[badhorse]

+1 This makes way to much sense.
 

[APDrone]

+1

Make any crew position key-mappable/programmable.

[VonKost]

Most Definitely!

[USCH]

+1

[Babalonian]

+1

Also like the idea of making them programable/assignable, and by standardizing, it would help this happen.