Author Topic: A few new fighters  (Read 1019 times)

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
A few new fighters
« on: July 14, 2011, 11:19:49 PM »
1) IAR-80 A (6 7.62mm MG's), and B (4 7.62mm MG's and 2 12.7mm's)
2) IAR-80/81C: IAR-80C had 4 7.62mm MG's, and 2 Mg 151/22's. the IAR 81 was a "dive bomber", but it was just the IAR-80 with a bomb rack under neath  :lol. So just give make the IAR-80C and give it a bomb-rack.
3) re-2005 Italian fighter, would be quite competitive in the MA.
4) Fiat G5.5

Getting late now, sorry but I'm faling asleep at the computer.I'll post the specs tommarow.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2011, 08:45:14 AM »
Yes, post some specs, for these night fighters, we need ever so badly!!!

See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2011, 09:13:45 AM »
Yes, post some specs, for these night fighters, we need ever so badly!!!


:huh  :headscratch:

 :aok to the IAR-80 one my fav looking planes.

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2011, 09:33:32 AM »
The subtlety of my humor probably flew over your head as if it were a U2 and this were 1982.   But I digress, you were lost in the part about that Romanian bird; one which I can find no reference to actually fighting, at night.  

:huh  :headscratch:

 :aok to the IAR-80 one my fav looking planes.

Day, night aside.... The IAR-81/80 should be here in the game.  It may have even shot a few Lightning down during Barbarossa. 
« Last Edit: July 15, 2011, 09:37:06 AM by LLogann »
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #4 on: July 15, 2011, 09:42:21 AM »
Uh... You're the only one that mentioned day or night....


So...    :headscratch: on you

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #5 on: July 15, 2011, 09:48:55 AM »
Uh... You're the only one that mentioned day or night....


So...    :headscratch: on you
this.

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #6 on: July 15, 2011, 10:07:10 AM »
HOLY COW...............  My mind is totally playing tricks on me.   :uhoh

See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #7 on: July 15, 2011, 10:40:11 AM »
well theres a perfectly good topic derailed  :lol.


I'll have the specs as soon as I can find two sources that match up.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline mthrockmor

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2649
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #8 on: July 15, 2011, 10:44:28 AM »
When in doubt wiki...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAR_80

I still want the Me-410 next I will save that for another thread. This is an interesting bird. Does it have long legs or squaty ones like the La series?

Boo
No poor dumb bastard wins a war by dying for his country, he wins by making the other poor, dumb, bastard die for his.
George "Blood n Guts" Patton

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2011, 10:51:09 AM »
does what have long legs? the 410, or the IAR's?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reggiane_Re.2005

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_G.55

Untill I DO find credible sources, heres the always questionable wikipedia.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1848
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2011, 11:06:46 AM »
+1 for the IAR-80
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #11 on: July 16, 2011, 07:13:57 PM »
Always makes me think the F4U slept with some other plane, and made this.

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #12 on: July 16, 2011, 07:23:08 PM »
LOL. So an F4U boinked a spitfire? Ok, I can see that.

And I was thinking about how to implement the IAR-80C and -81C. They were TECHINICLY two different planes, even if the only difference was a bomb trapeze mounted under the fuselage. So it seems we have 3 options:

1) give the IAR-80C a bomb rack and call it a fighter/attacker
2) Give the IAR-81C the option to remove the bomb rack and call it a bomber/attacker
3) model both planes and have an incredibly redundant ride, and have a fighter that can spawn out of the BH, since you can just leave the bomb in the hanger.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #13 on: July 17, 2011, 05:12:17 AM »
I made a topic awhile back in the spring asking for the Iar-80. wish search was working so i could post it.  :(

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17423
Re: A few new fighters
« Reply #14 on: July 17, 2011, 05:39:54 AM »
does what have long legs? the 410, or the IAR's?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reggiane_Re.2005

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_G.55

Untill I DO find credible sources, heres the always questionable wikipedia.

lol you discredit your own sources.  perhaps next time you will come better prepared   :D.

semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.