wish list,list

[perdue3]

Agreed but i had to type it in note pad and copy and paste it back n forth twice becuase for some reason the typing box on the forum goes up to the top everytime i try to type at the bottom which is prob on my end so i just quick typed it in notepad as it still took about hour 40 mins to type/look up facts and then copyed it from notepad into here..

and also i kind of suck with punctuation it slows my typing down to much and i was working against the clock but if you like i can add some in the morning

I would believe you if you would have punctuated here.

[stabbyy]

I would believe you if you would have punctuated here.

and if you look at the timestamp on that its an hour after i posted which was right before i went to sleep but lets try to stay on topic here? i already stated i suck at it and that it slows my typing down as i learned to type without using it i have to think about using it so i type how i type and if you would have read the entire forum you would also see i clearly stated i cannot go back and fix it and that if it was that much of an issue i would go back and take the time to do so..but as stated before i cannot now but your post is totally off topic and irrelevant to the subject posted anyways this is not the "lets point out every little error in the typing"(one i wanted to use would have been classed as offensive) forum its the wish list where you comment on the idea posted not the lack of punctuation this would be one of those posts that is entirely pointless and just posted for the sake of posting

now can we stay on the subject

[LThunderpocket]

@ tank ace

very possible but the website search yeilds nothing for m12/ju 290/YB-40/CB17G which is what i ment when subjects offten
get mashed together like b29/nuke the nuke has no direct relation to the b29 as an aircraft the b29 has no direct relation to the nuke they were not made "as one"

people useally refer to a bombless b17 when refering to a yb 40 when in reality they are 2 dif planes

@LThunderpocket

which some do you think you could go for and which ones do you think are a bad idea? and yeah they may not add them but its a wishlist one can only try

i think we sorta need 4 6 and 8.#2 would be awsome

[Karnak]

YB-17 was, indeed, experimental.  It was used experimentally on operations where it was determined to be an unsuccessful idea whereupon it was canceled.  If it had not been experimental they would not have had the "Y" in front of the name.

[Ack-Ack]

and troops providing air support over an airfeild tricking somone into thinking they are diving on b17s u have to remember its a game planes that wernt "effective" in real life tend to be 10x more effective like a B25H in game

Where do you get that the B-25H is 10x more effective in AH than it was in real life?

ack-ack

[Karnak]

Where do you get that the B-25H is 10x more effective in AH than it was in real life?

ack-ack

In fairness, it is significantly aided by the fact it does not have a loader that is affected by G forces.  I recall reading that it was quite hard to reload the cannon when the aircraft was maneuvering.