Author Topic: filling in the gaps, a few GV's  (Read 1056 times)

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« on: July 18, 2011, 03:15:47 AM »
I think as it is we have several large holes in the tank set, so I would like to request some plugs for those holes.

1) Panzer III Ausf. E
2) M3 Stuart (heavier armor, and more amunition than the M8)
3) BT-7M
4) Panzer III Ausf. H
5) Valntine Mk IX
6) Panzer III Ausf L.
7) Panzer IV Ausf. G
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2011, 05:44:44 AM »
Locher?

Das ist vielen Panzer, die sind das gleiche.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2011, 05:46:20 AM by LLogann »
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2011, 06:37:04 AM »
no M-18? :(
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline AHTbolt

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 582
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2011, 08:05:51 AM »
churchill with 2pounder for early war with 6pounder for mid to latewar, cromwell and the comet with 17 pounder for late war.
AWWWWW CRAP YOU SHOT WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In the desert somewhere west of Kuwait 1991.

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2011, 01:48:01 PM »
Just trying to fill in the holes, not get stuff for LW and late MW.

1) panzer III E/M3/BT7 for EW standard tanks. Panzer III Ausf H for perk tank, capable of fighting the T-34 (also would be perked)

2) Panzer III Ausf. L/Panzer IV Ausf. G/Valentine IX for MW tanks, german ones could be used for setups like N. Afrika and Stalingrad and still give the M4(75) and T-34/76 a fair chance. (I also imagine the Panzer IV G. would make a great perk farmer. The 50mm armor would give it a LW ENY value of 30 if not 35, but it would still have a good gun).

Churchill and Cromwell would also be good add.

I also wish to add the Churchill Mk. II and III to the list, along with the Cromwell Mk. IV.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5805
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2011, 10:34:15 PM »
Can't leave out the Crusader and it's variants.

Like what I see so far though. :aok
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #6 on: July 18, 2011, 11:00:51 PM »
only problem I see is that they really wouldn't be much better than the M8. with the M8, you get weaker armor, but a better gun. IMO, we can substitute and make due untill we fill some of the bigger holes.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20387
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #7 on: July 18, 2011, 11:57:36 PM »
Just trying to fill in the holes, not get stuff for LW and late MW.

1) panzer III E/M3/BT7 for EW standard tanks. Panzer III Ausf H for perk tank, capable of fighting the T-34 (also would be perked)

2) Panzer III Ausf. L/Panzer IV Ausf. G/Valentine IX for MW tanks, german ones could be used for setups like N. Afrika and Stalingrad and still give the M4(75) and T-34/76 a fair chance. (I also imagine the Panzer IV G. would make a great perk farmer. The 50mm armor would give it a LW ENY value of 30 if not 35, but it would still have a good gun).

Churchill and Cromwell would also be good add.

I also wish to add the Churchill Mk. II and III to the list, along with the Cromwell Mk. IV.

Why would you perk a Panzer III with a short barrel 50 or a long barrel 50 for that matter?
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #8 on: July 19, 2011, 03:49:26 AM »
M4(76) is perked, and its gun isn't any better than the panzer's. Its perk worthy in the EW arena because (if I had my way) it would be facing mainly M3 stuarts, Panzer III E's, and BT-7's. Picture it like the panther of the EW arena. T-34/76 would be like the Tiger of the EW arena. Give it a base price of 40 (cause you need to be either very good, or lucky to kill a T-34/76 with one of free tanks.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17423
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2011, 04:12:48 AM »
M4(76) is perked, and its gun isn't any better than the panzer's. Its perk worthy in the EW arena because (if I had my way) it would be facing mainly M3 stuarts, Panzer III E's, and BT-7's. Picture it like the panther of the EW arena. T-34/76 would be like the Tiger of the EW arena. Give it a base price of 40 (cause you need to be either very good, or lucky to kill a T-34/76 with one of free tanks.

not sure how long you have been playing, but the m4(76) was perked only because of its rate of fire.  It could fire 3 shells to other tanks 1.  as for the other tanks I highly doub it that they will anything other than hangar queens.

semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #10 on: July 19, 2011, 05:34:19 AM »
You're missing the point. Point is that a gun isn't the only factor for perking. The panzer III H would have thick (for the period) armor, at 60mm, and would have a powerful (again, for the period) cannon.

And 3-1 is a bit extreme. It wasn't quite 2-1 for the M4 vs the panzer, and its been reduced. Between 1.4-1 and 1.7-1 is a bit more realistic now.

Was also perked because of its toughness IIRC. Shells have a damage value, that value decreases based on how much armor it has to penetrate. I assume it is reduced by range to some degree as well. The M4(76) can take more "damage" than the panzer and the T-34. If it had HVAP like the T-34, it would be perked even higher.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline iron650

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 662
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #11 on: July 19, 2011, 06:38:48 AM »
only problem I see is that they really wouldn't be much better than the M8. with the M8, you get weaker armor, but a better gun. IMO, we can substitute and make due untill we fill some of the bigger holes.

The guns (2pdr or 40mm) were about the same and we don't have much British armor (none) in the game. Plus, it would fit into the EW as any other tank would on the list. Keep in mind tank ace that there was a 6pdr (57mm) variant of the Crusader.

+1

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #12 on: July 19, 2011, 08:36:12 AM »
If one is trying to "fill the gaps", I'd start with the Panzer III, M18 (or even M10), StuG III, and Su-100.  All four represent something we do not have in AH at the moment, AND were very prominent in WWII.  The King Tiger, any of the Soviet JS/ISU, the Pershing, Comet, etc were there too late and contributes too little in comparison to the workhorses of the war.  I vote to leave them out until the "gaps" are filled.   :) 

If HTC were to add the Panzer III (w/ 2 main gun options), StuG  III (with 2 gun options to span EW-LW), another variant or 2 to the SdKfz 251, and re-model the Panzer IV H, they not need to add another German gv into the game for another 10 years (2 new German GV's, a re-model, and a addition).     :)       

Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #13 on: July 19, 2011, 06:50:32 PM »
True loon, but the Allies would be going "WAHAHAHA!!! HTC doesn't love us  :cry". dispite the majority of aircraft being allied.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: filling in the gaps, a few GV's
« Reply #14 on: July 19, 2011, 07:26:21 PM »
True loon, but the Allies would be going "WAHAHAHA!!! HTC doesn't love us  :cry". dispite the majority of aircraft being allied.

Nah, if the numbers are looked at the US and Soviets have the bulk of their tank forces represented already in AH (both Sherman's and both T34's).  The Germans do have the Panzer IV, Panther, and Tiger, but the StuG III was a huge part of the Germans armored effort. 

Depending on the source, there were approximately 9400 Pzr IV's, 8300 StuG III's, 6200 Panthers, 4400 Pzr III's, 2500 Hetzers, 1350 Tigers, and 500 King Tigers.  Right there was the bulk of Germany's armored force.  With exception to the Panzer II's, everything else used by the Germans were produced in the few hundreds.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.