AAAHHHHH . SM-82 a faster armed three engine axis transport used for para ops AND bombing
couldn't we perk it?
I suppose, but I am skeptical how many people would think paying perks for it would be worth it.
Perks for what? A transport that has a few rifle caliber machine guns? It would be a lower perk value then a C-47 of course, however I don't see any reason for it being even near as being perked.
And wouldn't be added for that reason.Ju52, sure. You get the choice of speed or guns when you choose between a C-47 and a Ju52. An SM.82 that is faster than the C-47 and armed is no longer a choice.
bull. you have no actual idea whether htc would add it or not. if the documentation and illustrations exist, it could very well get added.
Why ever use a C-47 when you have an SM.82 as an option? It is faster and armed.
Why ever use a hurr one when you have a hurri2 as an option? it's more heavely armed and comes with droptanks/bombs. Why ever choose a spit one when you have a spit V as an option? its more heavely armed and comes with drop tanks.Why choose the b25 when you have the b26? the b26 is more heavely armed and comes with a bigger bombload.Just because there is something better already in the game, should not be reason enough to exclude an aircraft from inclusion.
Because there are Hurr I fans, Spit I fans and B-25 fans. I have yet to see a single thread in my over 11 years on this forum from a C-47 fan.Basically, the request for the SM.82 is a request to make base captures easier.