no clue why its slower then an M4A4, being it had the same engine
I think the explanation for that is quite simple. Sources vary. It really had the same speed roughly. You get differing quotes for the M4A4 and the Firefly both, so there is no surprise when you make comparisons they sometimes are different.
As far as "extra stuff" added on to the tank? all AFVs in WW2 had that. US, Brit, Canadian, Polish Shermans all had all sorts of things thrown on them. That is not modelled by HTC I would not think and I cant see it being a reason as there was no standard exta stuff to quantify. Each crew had their own decisions to sandbags, tracks, tents, bogies, netting, added camo, whatever. Its like asking what was a standard gypsy wagon fitted with. Good luck finding that.
...I was taking a 2nd look at the M4A3(75) and M4A3(76) speeds as well. Most sources put them at between 29-32 mph. 26 mph also seems a bit on the low end which is the top speed for both in AH on lvl ground. The Shermans were not a slow tank. The 500 hp gas engine versions could clip along at a fairly brisk pace.
Is there a possibility with the upgrade they are missing the top gear?