Ammo bunker model is porked

[stabbyy]

wouldent it just be easier to make smaller guns riccochet much like they do against ship guns? or the deck of the cv? say 30m+ breaks threw on aircraft and tanks need to use AP to effectively take em out? or to just keep it simple any round under 30mm cant break threw?

[Rob52240]

Since some of you are obviously still looking for an advantage by trying to force a rule change, how about assigning an ENY value to bombs of differing sizes.

[gyrene81]

Since some of you are obviously still looking for an advantage by trying to force a rule change, how about assigning an ENY value to bombs of differing sizes.

advantage? rule change? 

don't you think it's an advantage to be able to knock out a structure with machine guns that should be at least as hard as a tiger tank?

[VonMessa]

advantage? rule change? 

don't you think it's an advantage to be able to knock out a structure with machine guns that should be at least as hard as a tiger tank?

Harder to breach than a nun's panties?

[Mystery]

Just a quick thought -

One ord that we don't have is the US 1600 lb AP bomb; all we have is GP bombs. Hardening the ammo bunkers would make them much harder to pork but much more valuable to do so. Yes, I know the 1600 lb was primarily for anti-ship ops but it seems it would make a mess of reinforced concrete.

I like the general idea of differentiating the ords based on target requirement.

[ToeTag]

And the possible consequences for gameplay balance?

More med bombers to shoot at?!

[B-17]

On the subject of Medium Bombers...




B-26!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Raptor05121]

On the subject of Medium Bombers...




B-26!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hell yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh