Author Topic: Goons are too fragile  (Read 1104 times)

Offline shdo

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 84
Goons are too fragile
« on: August 28, 2011, 04:12:19 PM »
c47s are tough birds. they should not fall apart when a .30 cal just flies in there "generial direction".

flame as you will but they should take more damage before they fall apart.  i can see troops/supps being destroyed in them but they are made of the same material as the bombers and fighters.

shdo

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #1 on: August 28, 2011, 04:21:53 PM »
However, they are a civilian design and perhaps not as robust against battle damage.

Remember, the A6M2 and G4M1 are made of the same stuff as a P-47 and B-17.  (Actually, the alloy the Japanese used was stronger for its weight, but corroded).
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #2 on: August 28, 2011, 05:27:42 PM »
What makes you think they easily fall apart with 30cals?
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7341
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #3 on: August 28, 2011, 06:19:22 PM »
Hurricane with 8x30cal. or 12x30cal?

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #4 on: August 28, 2011, 08:15:34 PM »
Hurricane with 8x30cal. or 12x30cal?

They have 8
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Cjpedrido

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 94
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #5 on: August 28, 2011, 08:25:17 PM »
+1.  I concur.   :aok

Offline shdo

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 84
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #6 on: August 28, 2011, 09:02:49 PM »
However, they are a civilian design and perhaps not as robust against battle damage.

Remember, the A6M2 and G4M1 are made of the same stuff as a P-47 and B-17.  (Actually, the alloy the Japanese used was stronger for its weight, but corroded).

were not talking about fuel tanks burning.

i've never seen a goon last long enough for it's fuel to burn.  most planes are hollow.  those with lots of internals actually can be more susceptible to a golden bb than those that don't.  true it does not have tons of redundant systems but if you were too look inside it's would be very similar to many bombers in the fuselage.

shdo

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #7 on: August 28, 2011, 09:30:10 PM »
were not talking about fuel tanks burning.
Neither was I.  The early Japanese planes, particularly the Ki-43 and G4M1, were lightly built which made them more susceptible to damage inflicted structural failures.

It is entirely possible for an aircraft to be built out of the same stuff, yet be markedly weaker structurally.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #8 on: August 28, 2011, 10:00:52 PM »
were not talking about fuel tanks burning.

i've never seen a goon last long enough for it's fuel to burn.  most planes are hollow.  those with lots of internals actually can be more susceptible to a golden bb than those that don't.  true it does not have tons of redundant systems but if you were too look inside it's would be very similar to many bombers in the fuselage.

shdo

Well duh goons are mostly hollow. Its a transport plane meant to carry troops and supplys. That means hollow space  :rolleyes:.


And I've had a good dogfight with HighTone in his Ki-84 with my C-47.  It took him several minutes to bring me down, and that was mostly because of lost control surfaces. I took multiple 12.7mm hits and even some 20mm hits. The goon is a sturdy aircraft for its size, and given the crap people have the plane do, I'm supprised it holds up as well as it does.
« Last Edit: August 28, 2011, 10:28:21 PM by Tank-Ace »
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline talos

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 62
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #9 on: August 28, 2011, 10:18:48 PM »
C47 was designed for the civilian market. It was never intended to get shot at, let alone actually get shot. I think what your looking for is a CB-40, a hollowed out B-17 carrying 63-65 troops a piece,  (;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;7888e) YAY FOR NEW KITTEN!!!!!!!!!!!!, as well as a duel 50. cal on the nose and tale.

but honestly the chances of these getting into the game are beyond "slim to none" i honestly don't know if they ever flew in combat and the sheer volume of troops would just be insane

so seeing as how we will never get anything like this, it would probably be best you keep the C-47 out of the furballs  :salute
C-46 "Curtiss Calamity"

Offline AHTbolt

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 582
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #10 on: August 29, 2011, 07:26:27 AM »
The C47 was not built the same as the DC3. The floor was built stronger to support cargo and wing spars were beefed up.
AWWWWW CRAP YOU SHOT WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In the desert somewhere west of Kuwait 1991.

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #11 on: August 29, 2011, 07:45:39 AM »
the C47A in aces high doesn't get the special treatment bombers get, AKA nearly invincible. Is a Ju88 for example that much more resistant in real life? :bolt:
now posting as SirNuke

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #12 on: August 29, 2011, 09:19:36 AM »
I haven't read any war stories or tales of C-47s ever being very robust. They were reliable. They hauled cargo.

They were lost in the thousands, if I recall. That might indicate they were highly susceptible to enemy fire.

They also didn't perform acrobatics like ours do in-game. They flew level, took off, and landed. That's it. In here the standard tactic is to turn so tightly you'd pin people to the deck with G forces. It's not very realistic.

It's probably overmodeled. Have you considered that? Maybe it should go down even faster...

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #13 on: August 29, 2011, 11:29:29 AM »
hmm...make the goon tougher so you can deliver the troops and not die...pssh no. -1.

goons could be downed by a M1 Garand if you aim right.

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Goons are too fragile
« Reply #14 on: August 29, 2011, 11:31:59 AM »
the C47A in aces high doesn't get the special treatment bombers get, AKA nearly invincible. Is a Ju88 for example that much more resistant in real life? :bolt:


Nope, you're thinking of the He-111. Ju-88 was pretty sturdy.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"