Havent requested this in ALONG time...

[Flipperk]

the C47 and the jeep are in the game because both carry troops/supplies. if he didnt have either one then we couldnt capture bases. sure the 251 and M3 has troops but what about the spawn points? not all of them go to an enemy base.

thats why we have them. im sure someone with an IQ of only 30 could have figured that out.

We only had the C47 and M3 for the longest time...the Jeep and 251 were added WAY later...why? IDK...we already had two vehicles that carried troops and supplies....


IQ of only 30 is not enough

[Tyrannis]

The fact that no one can find the quote proves he's right...

Dont bother trying to cloud the childs mind with truth. it would only confuse him more.

the C47 and the jeep are in the game because both carry troops/supplies. if he didnt have either one then we couldnt capture bases. sure the 251 and M3 has troops but what about the spawn points? not all of them go to an enemy base.

thats why we have them. im sure someone with an IQ of only 30 could have figured that out.

You really need to reread what is typed.

The Drache could carry both troops, and cargo. Combine that with the fact that it has vertical take off/landing +hovering abilities would make it the most unique aircraft in the game.

Add a heli pad to the GV fields, and let it up from GV bases, and its importance gets even higher as a scout/resupplying/bombing chopper.

[skorpion]

Dont bother trying to cloud the childs mind with truth. it would only confuse him more.


You really need to reread what is typed.

The Drache could carry both troops, and cargo. Combine that with the fact that it has vertical take off/landing +hovering abilities would make it the most unique aircraft in the game.

Add a heli pad to the GV fields, and let it up from GV bases, and its importance gets even higher as a scout/resupplying/bombing chopper.

did i ever say it didnt carry troops/supplies? sure we could use another troop carrier as the 2 we have are instant "come kill me" icons. the fact that it carries troops/supplies doesnt mean it will be added.

also, why would HT model a heli pad just for your fragile flying piece of sheet metal at a gv base. theres a reason they call them "v" bases. for vehicles as in "tanks". they call airbases "a" bases because you lift up from there in "aircraft" if you want a heli pad put it at a normal air base. even then that would be a ton of work. they would have to redo a perfectly fine airbase so they could place that heli pad in there.

[Tyrannis]

did i ever say it didnt carry troops/supplies? sure we could use another troop carrier as the 2 we have are instant "come kill me" icons. the fact that it carries troops/supplies doesnt mean it will be added.

also, why would HT model a heli pad just for your fragile flying piece of sheet metal at a gv base. theres a reason they call them "v" bases. for vehicles as in "tanks". they call airbases "a" bases because you lift up from there in "aircraft" if you want a heli pad put it at a normal air base. even then that would be a ton of work. they would have to redo a perfectly fine airbase so they could place that heli pad in there.

I didnt know jeeps and m3's were "tanks".

Poking fun at how badly you construct your criticism aside, The only reason Planes do not take off from GV bases is because there is no Airfield for them to take off of.

The Drache has Vertical lift. It does not require a runway to take off. Draches also spent time in the field. Landing in the forrests/mountains far away from airfields to resupply troops and other various war machines. It could, and it did, take off from Vehicle points.

And no, adding a simply Heli pad wouldnt take a "ton of work".
Why do you continue to talk?

[skorpion]

I didnt know jeeps and m3's were "tanks".

Poking fun at how badly you construct your criticism aside, The only reason Planes do not take off from GV bases is because there is no Airfield for them to take off of.

The Drache has Vertical lift. It does not require a runway to take off. Draches also spent time in the field. Landing in the forrests/mountains far away from airfields to resupply troops and other various war machines. It could, and it did, take off from Vehicle points.

And no, adding a simply Heli pad wouldnt take a "ton of work".
Why do you continue to talk?

did you even read half of my post? i said "vehicles" and "tanks". the M3/jeep are obviously not tanks. there "v"ehicles. hence the v in the base. for "vehicles" and "tanks".
as for the "adding a simple heli pad wont take a ton of work" why dont you tell HT on how to make it and where to place it at the fields when they are already all filled up in space with ack, barracks/ord bunkers/hangars/fuel tanks. not to mention the trees that occupy the open space on the Vehcile bases. after going thru all of that tell me all the possible places to put a decent sized helipad on a airbase/gv base. i doubt there would be any realilistic space for such a thing.


as for your last crappy futile attempt to silence me, i can because i have a point against it and you cant force me to stop. it makes you cry and your tears are delicious.

[AAJagerX]

I'm on the fence with this one.  There are planes and vehicles in game that could do the job more efficiently, but a Pony or 38 hauls ord better than a TBM...  If it were added, I'd definately find fun uses for it.  That being said, it's of very low priority compared to other planes/gvs that could be added before it.  As for picking up downed pilots, that's a big -1 as far as I'm concerned. 

[Tyrannis]

did you even read half of my post? i said "vehicles" and "tanks".

No you didnt. You said "as in". not and. "As in" and "and" both have different meanings. I know your IQ isent very high, But shouldnt even a child know the difference?  

theres a reason they call them "v" bases. for vehicles as in "tanks".

as for the "adding a simple heli pad wont take a ton of work" why dont you tell HT on how to make it and where to place it at the fields when they are already all filled up in space with ack, barracks/ord bunkers/hangars/fuel tanks. not to mention the trees that occupy the open space on the Vehcile bases. after going thru all of that tell me all the possible places to put a decent sized helipad on a airbase/gv base. i doubt there would be any realilistic space for such a thing.

so Ack takes up the entire base?  i think your wrong on that too. Might want to check the sizes of the 3 various field again. Theres plenty of room to fit a simple Heli-pad.


You have no point at all, Youve failed multiple times across many threads at your apparent "points". Im not crying at all. Laughing actually at how much of a fool you make yourself look. Youve failed to provide Proof of anything you claim. First the claim that Hitech said no Helis, now this. Its rather amusing watching you try to prove you know what your talking about.

I just would rather not have ANOTHER of my threads derailed from your stupidity. Oh how i wish there was a way to simply block people from opening certain topics.

[talos]

did you even read half of my post? i said "vehicles" and "tanks". the M3/jeep are obviously not tanks. there "v"ehicles. hence the v in the base. for "vehicles" and "tanks".

ummm...  isn't a heli a "v"ehicle. I mean sure its an aircraft, but at its root isn't it a "vehicle"

as for the "adding a simple heli pad wont take a ton of work" why dont you tell HT on how to make it and where to place it at the fields when they are already all filled up in space with ack, barracks/ord bunkers/hangars/fuel tanks. not to mention the trees that occupy the open space on the Vehcile bases. after going thru all of that tell me all the possible places to put a decent sized helipad on a airbase/gv base. i doubt there would be any realilistic space for such a thing.

just put it on the other side of the indestructible

[skorpion]

No you didnt. You said "as in". not and. "As in" and "and" both have different meanings. I know your IQ isent very high, But shouldnt even a child know the difference?  :headscratch:so Ack takes up the entire base?  i think your wrong on that too. Might want to check the sizes of the 3 various field again. Theres plenty of room to fit a simple Heli-pad.

there is only 1 place, and its at the middle of the field. why on earth would one place a helipad there?
(Image removed from quote.)


You have no point at all, Youve failed multiple times across many threads at your apparent "points". Im not crying at all. Laughing actually at how much of a fool you make yourself look. Youve failed to provide Proof of anything you claim. First the claim that Hitech said no Helis, now this. Its rather amusing watching you try to prove you know what your talking about.

I just would rather not have ANOTHER of my threads derailed from your stupidity. Oh how i wish there was a way to simply block people from opening certain topics.

the field acks and manned acks are scattered throughout the field, and let me show you with a screenshot of a normal small/med/large field and you tell me where your putting those heli pads. now back to you, your saying im derailing this thread when its been all about your stupid helicopter. find me one off-topic part please. i believe your going to be finding out that your the stupid one here for trying to keep it "on topic" when its been on topic since page one.

now heres the pic for a large field. tell me where your going to realalisticly going to place a helipad.

medium airfield and small airfield have to wait as im having trobles with photobucket uploading them...

[Seanaldinho]

Plenty of room in the space between the VH and center of the runways

[Rich52]

I'd rather see Iron Annie included in the game. It had a huge footprint in the war.

[skorpion]

Plenty of room in the space between the VH and center of the runways

not sure you know but theres a manned ack and an auto ack between there.

[Tyrannis]

find me one off-topic part please.

The fact that your spewing out "points" with no backbone to them and turning my Topic into another pissing contest like you did Wot topic and the p47 topic.

To answer the Field question, Others have already given you examples of where to put it. Its funny how you ignore what others are saying against you. No one here has agreed with anything youve said, Yet you think your still proving some "point"   How comical.

But to answer your question, theres alot of places to put it. Especially on a large airfield.


 

[skorpion]

realalisticly is what i meant, as in where you have places the spots there are ack in some of those.

as for your stupidity, it continues.

The fact that your spewing out "points" with no backbone to them and turning my Topic into another pissing contest like you did Wot topic and the p47 topic.

and read what i said.

the field acks and manned acks are scattered throughout the field, and let me show you with a screenshot of a normal small/med/large field and you tell me where your putting those heli pads. now back to you, your saying im derailing this thread when its been all about your stupid helicopter. find me one off-topic part please. i believe your going to be finding out that your the stupid one here for trying to keep it "on topic" when its been on topic since page one.

if you havent noticed, its in this thread that your saying is getting derailed. you fail. again.

[Ack-Ack]

I think the responce in the past for this it did not see combat & was not at squadron strength therefor wont qualify.
The only helicopter of WWII that fits this criteria was made by the Japanese.

We had helicopters in the CBI flying behind enemy lines and conducting medical evacuations of wounded soldiers and downed airmen.  The first combat medical evacuation took place in Burma and additional ones also took place in China.  The R-4 was also used to ferry supplies and parts between floating aviation repair ships in the South Pacific and when they weren't flying ferry missions, the R-4s would also be tasked with flying SAR, medical evacuations and mercy flights.  I don't know the total of numbers that were in active service but those that were used during the war did see extensive use.

What the Japanese had was an auto-gyro and not a helicopter.

ack-ack