ok ill say it again... KI-61 update...stats to think about

[Tyrannis]

Must you insist in showing us how idiotic you can be with each post?

ack-ack

someone cant take a joke.

Dont be so cranky gramps.

[Karnak]

you really wanna know why we have the P-47M in game? because it saw service, was squadron strength, and was a big part of WW-2. same goes for any other airplane in here.

just because a plane has more kills than another doesnt mean it cant be in the game...duh...

Not really.  We have it because it was a "free" plane graphically speaking.  It uses the exact same geometry as the P-47D-40.

The P-47M played a part, but it was hardly a "big" part of WWII.

[Tyrannis]

Not really.  We have it because it was a "free" plane graphically speaking.  It uses the exact same geometry as the P-47D-40.

The P-47M played a part, but it was hardly a "big" part of WWII.

It was American.

Thats good enough for it to be considered a "big" part of WWII 


-cue the star spangled banner-     

[skorpion]

It was American.

hence the term being over-used "allies high"

[PFactorDave]

hence the term being over-used "allies high"

Have you been in the Late War Arena lately?  It's infested with 190s.

[skorpion]

Have you been in the Late War Arena lately?  It's infested with 190s.

half of the reason i dont want to play much anymore, if its filled with runstangs, run90's and spits, well its just no fun...if they add a half-decent tank such as the StuG-III Ausf G or a pershing, or add the Yak-3/P47D-22 then it'd be worth it.

[Tyrannis]

half of the reason i dont want to play much anymore, if its filled with runstangs, run90's and spits, well its just no fun...if they add a half-decent tank such as the StuG-III Ausf G or a pershing, or add the Yak-3/P47D-22 then it'd be worth it.

up a Panzer H.

Dont turn the turret.

You got your Stug III.

Have fun.

[skorpion]

up a Panzer H.

Dont turn the turret.

You got your Stug III.

Have fun.

panzer 3 chassis and panzer 4 chassis are different. not to mention speeds, suspension, ect...

[Tyrannis]

panzer 3 chassis and panzer 4 chassis are different. not to mention speeds, suspension, ect...

Yes they are.

But no one mentioned the Panzer 3,

So why you are mentioning it now is beyond me.

[Karnak]

half of the reason i dont want to play much anymore, if its filled with runstangs, run90's and spits, well its just no fun...if they add a half-decent tank such as the StuG-III Ausf G or a pershing, or add the Yak-3/P47D-22 then it'd be worth it.

Out of curiosity, what should the MA be filled with?

Also, what is this board's recent fascination with the P-47D-22?  What would it bring to the game?

[skorpion]

Yes they are.

But no one mentioned the Panzer 3,

So why you are mentioning it now is beyond me.

the panzer 3 chassis had 10mm less frontal armor i believe (not like it matters, panzers are split wide open by a can opener). also, the panzer 4 has skirts to dodge shaped charges. so there kinda different. the StuG III Ausf G. is built on a Pz-3 chassis.  thats why i brought up the panzer 3

[wil3ur]

the panzer 3 chassis had 10mm less frontal armor i believe (not like it matters, panzers are split wide open by a can opener). also, the panzer 4 has skirts to dodge shaped charges. so there kinda different. the StuG III Ausf G. is built on a Pz-3 chassis.  thats why i brought up the panzer 3

So then you want a vehicle that's slower than what is currently offered with less frontal protection, in a variant in which the turret is not adjustable...  that will make you happy?

[skorpion]

So then you want a vehicle that's slower than what is currently offered with less frontal protection, in a variant in which the turret is not adjustable...  that will make you happy?

a vehicle that played a massive part in the battle of kursk, a vehicle thats just as good as the panzer IMO (there both split wide open with a toothpick anyways) and a vehicle that had over 3000 of them produced. not to mention it could potentially be harder to spot with a sillouhette lower than the panzer we have in game.

i believe it deserves its spot here. and its probably going to be the first tank destroyer in game if we do get it. it meets all the criteria to join the game. just a matter of modeling it.

[Tyrannis]

a vehicle that played a massive part in the battle of kursk, a vehicle thats just as good as the panzer IMO (there both split wide open with a toothpick anyways) and a vehicle that had over 3000 of them produced. not to mention it could potentially be harder to spot with a sillouhette lower than the panzer we have in game.

i believe it deserves its spot here. and its probably going to be the first tank destroyer in game if we do get it. it meets all the criteria to join the game. just a matter of modeling it.

First TD is the m18.

Edit: wait...that may not be true. I think the m3 with the 75mm is considered a TD. thus would make it the first.

[skorpion]

First TD is the m18.

Edit: wait...that may not be true. I think the m3 with the 75mm is considered a TD. thus would make it the first.

we dont know if we got the M18 yet. and the M3 with the 75mm isnt really considered a tank destroyer.