Clarification for what to be added to the game

[JUGgler]

Do you know why the seat in the spitfire sits so low?





JUGgler

It is to make sure there is plenty of room for the Tiara!
 



JUGgler

[alpini13]

if squadron strength is a requirement then why is the ta152 in the game.....it was only partial squadron,jg301 flew ta152,fw190d and fw190a all at same time,not having enough of ta 152 to a full squadron.....but here are some rides that were at squadron strength,saw combat,shot down enemy aircraft,nade in quantitys that are higher than some aircraft that are in the game now.....and yet they are not in the game...HE-162,J2M,G-55,D-520,KI-43,KI-44,KI-45,YAK-3,MIG-3,PE-2,SM-82,SM-79,IAR-80/81,JU-188,HE-219,HE-177,JU-52,P-63,Beaufighter,BF-109g-10,AND I HAVENT EVEN GOT TO THE BI-PLANES OR ANPHIBS YET......AND WE GOT WHAT? OH YEAH,A P-40F. WTG

[Nathan60]

if squadron strength is a requirement then why is the ta152 in the game.....it was only partial squadron,jg301 flew ta152,fw190d and fw190a all at same time,not having enough of ta 152 to a full squadron.....but here are some rides that were at squadron strength,saw combat,shot down enemy aircraft,nade in quantitys that are higher than some aircraft that are in the game now.....and yet they are not in the game...HE-162,J2M,G-55,D-520,KI-43,KI-44,KI-45,YAK-3,MIG-3,PE-2,SM-82,SM-79,IAR-80/81,JU-188,HE-219,HE-177,JU-52,P-63,Beaufighter,BF-109g-10,AND I HAVENT EVEN GOT TO THE BI-PLANES OR ANPHIBS YET......AND WE GOT WHAT? OH YEAH,A P-40F. WTG

whoa! simmah down now

[alpini13]

 wow all this banter has led me to believe........believe in the addition of the italian fighter RE-2005....squadron strength,saw combat with three nations,shot down enemy planes,and was in series production.......its a lock!

[Karnak]

wow all this banter has led me to believe........believe in the addition of the italian fighter RE-2005....squadron strength,saw combat with three nations,shot down enemy planes,and was in series production.......its a lock!

We're still waiting on you to supply your evidence supporting your claim of the Re.2005 being in squadron service.

Also, remember that the Ta152 was variant of the Fw190D-9, so graphically it was easier to add than an entirely new airframe like the Re.2005.

[Butcher]

We're still waiting on you to supply your evidence supporting your claim of the Re.2005 being in squadron service.

Also, remember that the Ta152 was variant of the Fw190D-9, so graphically it was easier to add than an entirely new airframe like the Re.2005.

His source on things comes from Wikipedia, I wouldn't argue after all Wikipedia is never wrong.

[Wmaker]

We're still waiting on you to supply your evidence supporting your claim of the Re.2005 being in squadron service.

Re.2005's served in the 22nd Autonomous Group. It is also said that, despite the smaller numbers, they saw far wider service in the RA than G.55's.

Source: Ali d'Italia 16 - Reggiane RE 2005 by Gregory Alegi

About the author: http://www.gregoryalegi.com/home/English.html

[gyrene81]

i thought we had this discussion months ago. check out 362 ima Squadriglia, flew re.2005s from about april through august 1943. supposedly 1 was captured by the u.s. in july 43 and 17 were sent to the luftwaffe before the armistice was signed.

[Wmaker]

check out 362 ima Squadriglia,

Yep, RE2005s were concetrated to the 362 which was part of the 22nd.

[AHTbolt]

Alpini13 you want the 2005 so bad call HiTech get there cost to code it and put it  in the game and then Send them a check. And saying "i pay my 15 dollars" will not work. You want it so bad step up and pay for it.

[SmokinLoon]

ok... until HTC puts something on their website that say the exact requirements then it seems to me that there are only 2 requirements:

1> What HTC wants.
2> The winner of a vote as allowed by HTC. 

Another thing to think about: Anyone remember the list of aircraft from the last vote that the B29 won?  Me thinks it would be very smart to remember well that list because HTC chose which aircraft to allow us to vote on.  Meaning, those aircraft on that list are probably on a short list for being developed.  Just a hunch.

I'd forget any perceived "list" of criteria.  Yes, someone with authority perhaps can be quoted in a far away post about the requirements but do not let that be the end all.  HTC will can do as they wish without notice.