Potentially Competive fighters for the LWA

[skorpion]

postcountpostcountpostcount

i was talking at the time when all there was, was a panzer, m3, m8 and a tiger. the firefly wasnt here from the start i believe.

[Karnak]

i was talking at the time when all there was, was a panzer, m3, m8 and a tiger. the firefly wasnt here from the start i believe.

First vehicles in the game were, in the same patch, the Panzer IV H, M3, M16 and, I think, the Ostwind.  Also added during AH1 were the M8, LVTs and Tiger I.  The first tank of AH2 was the T-34/76 and then the Sherman VC Firefly.

[skorpion]

First vehicles in the game were, in the same patch, the Panzer IV H, M3, M16 and, I think, the Ostwind.  Also added during AH1 were the M8, LVTs and Tiger I.  The first tank of AH2 was the T-34/76 and then the Sherman VC Firefly.

thats funny...i thought the T34/85 came after the T34/76.

maybe its me not thinking straight due to the chineese food.

[Tyrannis]

i was talking at the time when all there was, was a panzer, m3, m8 and a tiger. the firefly wasnt here from the start i believe.

it wasent "post count" it was me wondering why youd post such a stupid statement.

[Karnak]

thats funny...i thought the T34/85 came after the T34/76.

maybe its me not thinking straight due to the chineese food.

You are correct, the T-34/85 came after the T-34/76.  Nothing in my post contradicts that though.  Three units were added in AH v2.00, the B-24J, the Ki-84-Ia and the T-34/76.  T-34/85 came much later.

[skorpion]

it wasent "post count" it was me wondering why youd post such a stupid statement.

really? just a smiley. yes thats postcounting. hmm, you said you'd -1 anything with the words "spit" or "fire" in it.

-1000 to anything with "spit" or "fire" in its name.

[Tyrannis]

really? just a smiley. yes thats postcounting. hmm, you said you'd -1 anything with the words "spit" or "fire" in it.

Yes i did, but thats not the words i quoted you on that the " " wasa targeted at.

well...thats kinda stupid. seeing it was the only thing to match a tiger...

This is. Where you say the firefly was the only thing we have to match the tiger.

So  back at ya.  And before you say "i ment before-.." you might want to state that in your original post.

[skorpion]

So  back at ya.  And before you say "i ment before-.." you might want to state that in your original post.

your obviously ego boosting alot tonight. making your "friend" quota?

you cant find anything better to do other than raise your postcount? if you just put a smiley up, you look like a fool whos postcounting because you dont even bother to say why you put it up with a real reason.


back then the firefly was able to match the tiger, and still can. it can even beat the tiger2 given an opportunity of hitting the sides/rear. maybe even the sides of the turret.

[Guppy35]

Any chance you two can not ruin a perfectly reasonable thread by trying to get the last word with each other on something off topic anyway?

[skorpion]

Any chance you two can not ruin a perfectly reasonable thread by trying to get the last word with each other on something off topic anyway?

you know he cant resist starting these up. almost every time he sees something he doesnt agree with it ends up like this.

[Tyrannis]

you know he cant resist starting these up. almost every time he sees something he doesnt agree with it ends up like this.

I merely highlighted the part of  your sentance that confused me. i didnt understand why you'd say such a dumb statement. which is why i posted the "say wut?" smiley.

but call it what you want. Someone disagrees with you, and you ether call them a troll, or say their raising their "post count".

Never ignored someone before, but i think you'll be the first on the list. Bye skorp, keep thinking your right, for your the only one who does. 
 

[skorpion]

I merely highlighted the part of  your sentance that confused me. i didnt understand why you'd say such a dumb statement. which is why i posted the "say wut?" smiley.

but call it what you want. Someone disagrees with you, and you ether call them a troll, or say their raising their "post count".

Never ignored someone before, but i think you'll be the first on the list. Bye skorp, keep thinking your right, for your the only one who does. 
 

heres my proof for ya guppy.

he always finds a reason to say im wrong. he obviously didnt pay "anntenchian" in spelling class...

[HighTone]

J2M3 or J2M5 A short ranged, well armed and rapid climbing interceptor. American pilots praised its handling in post war test flights.  Had fowler flaps with a trigger on the stick for combat use.
Ki-44-II A short ranges, moderately armed and rapid climbing interceptor.  One version armed with 40mm recoilless cannon.

+1 

[RTHolmes]

Any chance you two can not ruin a perfectly reasonable thread by trying to get the last word with each other on something off topic anyway?

not much chance of that I'm afraid. I'm getting really bored of these two derailing every thread with

[nrshida]