Author Topic: More control over ammo load  (Read 1012 times)

Offline STEELE

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
More control over ammo load
« on: September 25, 2011, 04:44:54 PM »
I'd like the option to not load the cowl gun magazines in a 190 a5 for example..  takes to long to empty them, and the ballistics are way too different in many planes' cannon vs cowl guns
The Kanonenvogel had 6 rounds per pod, this is not even close to being open for debate.

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #1 on: September 25, 2011, 05:10:04 PM »
How much does the ammo weight?
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #2 on: September 25, 2011, 06:04:31 PM »
How much does the ammo weight?

like 60 something lbs

big weight savings... :lol

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #3 on: September 25, 2011, 09:09:41 PM »
apparantly 30 seconds is too long to empty guns. in that much of a rush huh?

-1

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #4 on: September 25, 2011, 10:25:19 PM »
+1. Theres many planes i wish i could spawn without certain ammo with.

I kinda wish we had the choice to "mod" the guns in bombers too. (example: Take out the waist guns in the b17 to make more room for ammo in the tail)

Offline fudgums

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4052
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #5 on: September 25, 2011, 10:26:49 PM »
+1

No ammo loadout for tailgun in 110's
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #6 on: September 25, 2011, 10:30:27 PM »
+1

Even though the ammo weight might not make a significant difference by itself but it will change the CV. For airplanes that have guns on the nose (such as a mossy or P38) the removal of ammo will make you more maneuverable.  

Also just sitting there on the runway and emptying your guns will make a significant difference in your hit %.
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #7 on: September 25, 2011, 10:41:58 PM »
Also just sitting there on the runway and emptying your guns will make a significant difference in your hit %.

how so? your not really aiming at anything.

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2011, 11:06:28 PM »
how so? your not really aiming at anything.

Exactly, and your not hitting anything either. So the percentage of your hits that actually hit an enemy target decreases.
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2011, 11:15:08 PM »
-1

Aircraft did not fly sorties with those guns unloaded.  Bf110s did not fly without the tail gunner.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #10 on: September 25, 2011, 11:55:03 PM »
-1

Aircraft did not fly sorties with those guns unloaded.  Bf110s did not fly without the tail gunner.

I thought by the end of the war (when Germany was low on ammo) not all guns were loaded 100% before take off.
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2011, 06:47:39 AM »
Exactly, and your not hitting anything either. So the percentage of your hits that actually hit an enemy target decreases.
so now its all about score? trust me, score wont get you anything.

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2011, 06:54:23 AM »
+1 I'm a gamey scoring tard.
now posting as SirNuke

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2011, 07:41:37 AM »
+1.  The 110 would be a lot more fun if I could empty the tail guns in the hanger :)
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: More control over ammo load
« Reply #14 on: September 26, 2011, 12:58:55 PM »
+1.  The 110 would be a lot more fun if I could empty the tail guns in the hanger :)
"A lot more fun"?  Really?

Does that 50-100lbs really make that much difference on a 15,000lb fighter?

Get a grip people.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-