Author Topic: Making the Case: PBY Catalina  (Read 4934 times)

Offline olds442

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2239
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #45 on: September 29, 2011, 05:16:10 PM »
its lower than half right now. and i dont think turning it down will make much of a difference, but why would one turn down the monitor brightness over a game? if your that worried about it then you need to chillax, take a swig of some orphan tears and let the hallucinations roll on in...
my god... i should have kept rays number
only a moron would use Dolby positioning in a game.
IGN: cutlass "shovels and rakes and implements of destruction"

Offline olds442

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2239
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #46 on: September 29, 2011, 05:17:09 PM »
Which is why I said a "real night time" modeled so you couldn't up the gamma to make is as bright as day.  Sheesh...don't you kids learn reading comprehension in school these days?


Yes it can.

ack-ack
dont u know anyting btw i mean if u make so u reduce vis range at night. no mater how muhc grama u turn up it will still be a vis limit
only a moron would use Dolby positioning in a game.
IGN: cutlass "shovels and rakes and implements of destruction"

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #47 on: September 29, 2011, 05:19:15 PM »
my god... i should have kept rays number
uhh...what?



dont u know anything

:rofl

ask Ack that question when hes at least 90 years old. seriously, do you know who your talking to?  :lol

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #48 on: September 29, 2011, 05:19:43 PM »
dont u know anyting btw i mean if u make so u reduce vis range at night. no mater how muhc grama u turn up it will still be a vis limit
no habla whatever language that is...
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline OOZ662

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7019
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #49 on: September 30, 2011, 10:22:54 PM »
Did I really just read "the admins can control gamma" followed by "turn your monitor brightness down?" Logic these days, I swear.

Admin takes away gamma slider -> Player uses brightness slider on the monitor, video driver gamma adjustment, or in my case, the handy-dandy increased gamma mode buttons on my monitor, to crank it outside of the game's controls.

As to reducing the visual range so that gamma doesn't make a difference...it'd seem kinda strange to have planes appearing out of thin air. Moving the fog in to ridiculous closeness would work, I suppose, but still suffers from looking very odd.
A Rook who first flew 09/26/03 at the age of 13, has been a GL in 10+ Scenarios, and was two-time Points and First Annual 68KO Cup winner of the AH Extreme Air Racing League.

Offline Squire

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7683
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #50 on: October 01, 2011, 12:19:14 PM »
Night time SEA setups have continued to be a problem. I would like to see the day where it would be technically possible to have them though in the MA as well as SEA. Absolutely.
Warloc
Friday Squad Ops CM Team
1841 Squadron Fleet Air Arm
Aces High since Tour 24

Offline bangsbox

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1017
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #51 on: October 02, 2011, 12:27:37 AM »
2 us torps sink a cv regardless if it has low survivability it can release both torps as soon as 40mm opens up and sink a cv... without 5in guys manning and looking this baby will sink cvs left and right. (an exaggeration but very doable). is can be introduced with only airfield take off...what ever until a diff water system is employed 

Offline Raptor05121

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #52 on: October 10, 2011, 12:17:59 PM »
2 us torps sink a cv regardless if it has low survivability it can release both torps as soon as 40mm opens up and sink a cv... without 5in guys manning and looking this baby will sink cvs left and right. (an exaggeration but very doable). is can be introduced with only airfield take off...what ever until a diff water system is employed 

x2 but the port ops would be a def. plus.
InGame: xRaptorx of the ***Alchemists***

Quote from: dirtdart
To suggest things that do not meet this basic criteria is equal to masturbation.  It may feel good to you, will not produce any tangible results, and you may be embarrassed if you get caught. 

Offline hawkeyeluke13

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #53 on: February 18, 2012, 04:33:26 PM »
I believe  that a PBY would be carriers version of the C47. It would not be a paratroopers plane, but it would be able to land in or near town and drop off troops. Either land or para drop supplies, mark targets , and can carry a bomb and bombsite which would make it a seaborne light bomber and torpedo plane. I ll give more ideas if asked but I think it should be added as the carriers version of the C47.   

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #54 on: February 25, 2012, 04:46:08 PM »
I believe  that a PBY would be carriers version of the C47.    

Ummm ..... heh ....... It wouldn't. They were shore based. And ....

"During World War II, PBYs were used in anti-submarine warfare, patrol bombing, convoy escorts, search and rescue missions (especially air-sea rescue), and cargo transport."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PBY_Catalina

Offline hawkeyeluke13

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #55 on: March 02, 2012, 05:19:21 PM »
and my father happened to be stationed on a sea plane tender at sea, yes they are sea based, they even had them in vietnam, that was my dad's first squadron was a bunch of seaplanes in the tonkin gulf , get your history right , and they can carry troops, just not be paradropable troops

Offline Rich52

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 868
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #56 on: March 03, 2012, 12:44:39 PM »
2 us torps sink a cv regardless if it has low survivability it can release both torps as soon as 40mm opens up and sink a cv... without 5in guys manning and looking this baby will sink cvs left and right. (an exaggeration but very doable). is can be introduced with only airfield take off...what ever until a diff water system is employed 

Can you name one CV sunk by a PBY with torps during the entire war?

In AH a PBY floating into a CV group would be crow bait. The only chance it would have is if there were no enemy in any guns or aircraft at all.
Yes, your on "Ignore"

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #57 on: March 03, 2012, 02:28:13 PM »
Can you name one CV sunk by a PBY with torps during the entire war?

In AH a PBY floating into a CV group would be crow bait. The only chance it would have is if there were no enemy in any guns or aircraft at all.

While PBYs didn't sink any CVs during the war, they did on occasion have the opportunity to attack them.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #58 on: March 03, 2012, 07:00:14 PM »
A quick hijack to respond to the "We want night guys"

You do realize that at night, aircraft are still highly visible?  A grey speck on black, as opposed to on blue.  Try it out yourself.

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: Making the Case: PBY Catalina
« Reply #59 on: March 04, 2012, 09:36:03 PM »
Can you name one CV sunk by a PBY with torps during the entire war?

In AH a PBY floating into a CV group would be crow bait. The only chance it would have is if there were no enemy in any guns or aircraft at all.

25 of them, at least 1 or two would get past... right?