Author Topic: Question about the battle of Britain.  (Read 695 times)

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Question about the battle of Britain.
« on: October 02, 2011, 06:18:29 AM »
Was watching a documentary on the Battle of Britain on the military channel last night.

At the end of the show, it made a statement which caught me as odd, because i'd never heard it before.

It claimed that Hitler sent his generals to invade Russia as punishment for their failure to win the air war with Britain.

How true is this? Did hitler really Invade Russia simply to punish his generals for failure? Or is this statement completely false?


Ive never heard it described like that before, which is why it seems odd to me.
 :salute

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8632
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #1 on: October 02, 2011, 06:45:50 AM »
Perhaps they meant he sent the Generals to the Russian front to punish them but no that wasn't the reason to invade. Think about what Russia and the Middle East has in common.  :old:
"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline Melvin

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2797
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #2 on: October 02, 2011, 06:58:54 AM »
Think about what Russia and the Middle East has in common.  :old:


Hairy women?
See Rule #4

Offline cpxxx

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2707
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2011, 06:59:55 AM »
Considering he always intended to invade the Soviet Union and never really had any interest in invading Britain. That can hardly be true.
It would hardly have been a punishment anyway as early on in the invasion, it would be the place to be.

Are you sure you didn't misunderstand the comment? I've seen some distortions in documentaries but that's particularly bad.

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2011, 07:20:40 AM »

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8632
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2011, 07:23:00 AM »
Hairy women?

 :rofl Yes that's it, old Adolf was after hairy women  :rofl
"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2011, 07:33:56 AM »
Considering he always intended to invade the Soviet Union and never really had any interest in invading Britain. That can hardly be true.
It would hardly have been a punishment anyway as early on in the invasion, it would be the place to be.

Are you sure you didn't misunderstand the comment? I've seen some distortions in documentaries but that's particularly bad.
How i typed it is nearly a word-for-word quote of what they said.
It struck me as odd, i knew about the oil in Russia.

Offline M0nkey_Man

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2254
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2011, 09:50:51 AM »
Perhaps they meant he sent the Generals to the Russian front to punish them but no that wasn't the reason to invade. Think about what Russia and the Middle East has in common.  :old:
does it start with o and end with il?
FlyKommando.com


"Tip of the dull butter knife"
delta07

Online Devil 505

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9176
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #8 on: October 02, 2011, 09:52:40 AM »
Remember too, that Hitler believed that the Opperation Barbarossa would be another swift victory. He was so sure of this, that he delayed the start by 5 weeks to sure up his southern flanks by invading the Balkans. After the Stalingrad debackle, yes, troops and officers were sent to the Ostfront as punnishment for poor actions in other theaters. But before that, victory over Spviet Union was viewed as Germany's greatest triumph.  
Kommando Nowotny

FlyKommando.com

Offline wil3ur

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1990
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #9 on: October 02, 2011, 10:53:30 AM »
I have to say TV is getting worse and worse.  For one thing, not a single General failed in the Battle of Britain.  This was a loss for Doenitz and Goering (with Goering bearing a larger responsibility).
"look at me I am making a derogatory remark to the OP"


Offline bortas1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1228
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #10 on: October 02, 2011, 08:26:14 PM »
Remember too, that Hitler believed that the Opperation Barbarossa would be another swift victory. He was so sure of this, that he delayed the start by 5 weeks to sure up his southern flanks by invading the Balkans. After the Stalingrad debackle, yes, troops and officers were sent to the Ostfront as punnishment for poor actions in other theaters. But before that, victory over Spviet Union was viewed as Germany's greatest triumph.  
makes me wonder about what intell the germans had on the interior of russia. major german intell failer i mean would be the first time on that. :headscratch:

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #11 on: October 02, 2011, 08:57:53 PM »
The invasion of the Soviet Union would have gone MUCH better if Hitler would have just sat back and let his generals do their job.  But, Hitler got lucky with the Czechs, Polish, French and Belgians, and even to a certain degree with the British so he truly believed that he was a military genius and this generals were fools.  Obviously... well... we know the rest of the story.   :D
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #12 on: October 02, 2011, 10:29:47 PM »
I have to say TV is getting worse and worse.  For one thing, not a single General failed in the Battle of Britain.  This was a loss for Doenitz and Goering (with Goering bearing a larger responsibility).

It a loss for all German military branches as one of the key reasons for the postponement and later cancellation of Sea Lion was the fact that there was hardly any coordination between the various military branches.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline curry1

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2321
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #13 on: October 02, 2011, 10:51:03 PM »
does it start with o and end with il?
How i typed it is nearly a word-for-word quote of what they said.
It struck me as odd, i knew about the oil in Russia.

Can someone please give me a logical argument about how the wars currently beings fought in the middle east have anything to do with oil?  Especially Afghanistan.
Curry1-Since Tour 101

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: Question about the battle of Britain.
« Reply #14 on: October 03, 2011, 01:06:33 AM »
Can someone please give me a logical argument about how the wars currently beings fought in the middle east have anything to do with oil?  Especially Afghanistan.
Please no, make your own topic about that subject.

No need to hijack my topic that bad.