HAHAHA the way I come across?
Yes, exactly how you come across. By talking about these "super facts" you imply that there was something dishonest going on in the process of modelling the Brewster, and therefore I don't really see any reason to go trhough the trouble of sending you with any info.
If that was the case then it would fly like an F2a2, and you would have been satisfied with the original version put out by HTC right?
I don't really understand what you are getting at with this. Why should a B239 perform like a F2A-2?
You have gotten your 46 or whatever planes for your country that have this miraculous kill total. <not that the Fin's boast or anything>
I would love to have the Boomer just to fight you in alone 
not to mention all the other reasons. <Base defence, bombs, smoke, does the Brewster have these?
Boast? I'm not boasting at all. I'm just stating a fact. The kill total just happens to be a quick and compact way to make a point that dispite their small numbers, they saw heavy combat. That is all.
Don't take this the wrong way but I think Brewster vs. Boomerang fights would get vey boring very quickly for the Brewster pilot.
Fine,.... then the RAAF wants there own P-40E that is there specs and manipulated to there preference by them and flown at tolerances they like.
We've already gone through this. HTC models the aircraft with standard, original power settings specified by the manufacturer.
Let the country 5x the size, and contributed way more to the war effort, have there 250 planes and you help with the research you hear me.
What does the countries' contribution to the war effort have anything to do with the "war effort" of individual aircraft types? Not a very logical argument. Why should I help with any research, because you say so?
The only incoherency going on here is your attitude towards the Australian's and there plane.
Ehh...
My attitude against Australians? Right. My stance regarding any plane to be added has nothing to do with the nation itself (any nation) but the significance of that particular aircraft compared to the others which could be added.
They deserve it just as much as the Fins did/do.
It has nothing to do with who "deserves" what.
Look at the way your coming across.... tell a fellow AH country that, that made there own plane, flew it in squadron strength in WWII for
2 years to suck eggs. 
That's not what I'm saying or how I come across, that's the way you want to take it.
I'm sure their nads are just as big if not bigger than the Fin's.
Heh, very coherent right there.
Yeh, that makes you look very smart.
It would keep up with Zekes and remove our brewster problem.
Keep up with Zekes? What Brewster problem?
I don't see any Brewster problem. Brewster's usage alone is too small for it to be any sort of "problem".
Very basic numbers on these planes show that Boomerang is far behind both the Zeros and Brewster in powerloading and wingloading for example. While Brewster's powerloading is roughly average for a WWII fighter, Boomerang's is down right poor. While the airfoils are similar, the wing loading of the Boomerang is significantly higher. It would be quite a dog in comparison. You can't bend physics no matter how big of a fan of the Boomerang you are.
And for the record, I would gladly welcome a DAP Beaufighter to the game even if it would come in the next version.
