« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added  (Read 1397 times)

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #15 on: October 11, 2011, 08:16:08 PM »
Quote from: skorpion on October 11, 2011, 05:01:35 PM
6 second looks at pictures dont always reveal everything....

and i have 20/10 vision. eye doctor? not anytime soon.

Count the road wheels.  8 is a Panzer IV, 6 for the Panzer III.
Logged
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17362
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #16 on: October 12, 2011, 03:59:08 AM »
cool add things for the 5 guys that play aw  :devil.

semp
Logged
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline DMVIAGRA

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 321
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #17 on: October 13, 2011, 06:34:23 AM »
Quote from: guncrasher on October 12, 2011, 03:59:08 AM
cool add things for the 5 guys that play aw  :devil.

semp

Yes, but they would be a nice addition. I don't play EW too often, but imagine these in the Main Arena you know. They're small, they'd be difficult to hit, but easily crippled. M3 Lee would be nice though!
Logged

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #18 on: October 13, 2011, 09:21:01 AM »
     I do have to wonder about the Pz 1 though.  Do you really want a tank that is outgunned by an M3 halftrack?  :P
Logged
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Bino

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5937
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #19 on: October 13, 2011, 10:49:14 AM »
Quote from: Guppy35 on October 11, 2011, 08:16:08 PM
Count the road wheels.  8 is a Panzer IV, 6 for the Panzer III.

Anorak!   ;)

Me, I could go for a PzKw. III ausf. J, with the 50mm L/60 gun.   :aok
Logged


"The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'." - Randy Pausch

PC Specs

Offline killerdude8

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 167
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #20 on: October 13, 2011, 09:40:22 PM »
i think they should add mobile flak guns y'know like pom poms and what not.
I'd give an example but i dont know of any.  :aok

EDIT: i was watching a documentry about an assault in france and they mentioned something about a french super tank. I ended up finding out what this beast is called: CHAR 2C  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Char_2C
« Last Edit: October 13, 2011, 09:47:13 PM by killerdude8 »
Logged
If your gonna fail, do it in such a way that people will be wondering how you managed to do that.

If it cant be fixed with duct tape, it cant be fixed at all.

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #21 on: October 13, 2011, 10:52:10 PM »
     You mean like the Ostwind and the Wirblewind?  Only ones I can think of are the Canadian Skink and I'm not sure it
saw combat and the M-19 in which only 285 were made.

     Skink:


     M-19:


     As far as the Char 2C goes, it says right in the article that it was never deployed..sorry

Logged
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #22 on: October 13, 2011, 11:41:28 PM »
Quote from: Rino on October 13, 2011, 10:52:10 PM
     You mean like the Ostwind and the Wirblewind?  Only ones I can think of are the Canadian Skink and I'm not sure it
saw combat and the M-19 in which only 285 were made.

     Skink:
(Image removed from quote.)

     M-19:
(Image removed from quote.)

     As far as the Char 2C goes, it says right in the article that it was never deployed..sorry


the fact that only 285 were made doesnt mean anything to its conclusion. i believe around only 40 ta152s were made. If it has a good sustanable period of combat action, than its eligable.
Logged

Offline killerdude8

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 167
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #23 on: October 13, 2011, 11:54:08 PM »
somewhat like those, but what im talking about is, flak like twin 5"s on CV taskgroups. i know there was like 2 german tanks mounted with 88's that shot flak shells. If you can find one of those then well be in buisness.  :rock
Logged
If your gonna fail, do it in such a way that people will be wondering how you managed to do that.

If it cant be fixed with duct tape, it cant be fixed at all.

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #24 on: October 14, 2011, 07:47:09 AM »
Quote from: Tyrannis on October 13, 2011, 11:41:28 PM
the fact that only 285 were made doesnt mean anything to its conclusion. i believe around only 40 ta152s were made. If it has a good sustanable period of combat action, than its eligable.

     Since it was created in late 44 sustainable combat action versus a practically non existant LW would have been
difficult and I have never seen any evidence of use in the PTO.  Apparently some were used in a ground support role,
not sure how sustainable that was either  :D
Logged
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17362
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #25 on: October 14, 2011, 08:59:44 AM »
Quote from: DMVIAGRA on October 13, 2011, 06:34:23 AM
Yes, but they would be a nice addition. I don't play EW too often, but imagine these in the Main Arena you know. They're small, they'd be difficult to hit, but easily crippled. M3 Lee would be nice though!

you play world of tanks dont you?  which is how you came up with the idea.  now you do realize that a jeep will kill most of these tanks, you dont have to use the main gun, the .50 cal on top is enough.  and the firepower that these "tanks" have, what exactly you planing to kill with them?  even a building takes 3 shots.


semp
Logged
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline 1Nicolas

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 176
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #26 on: October 14, 2011, 10:08:35 AM »
Quote from: DMVIAGRA on October 11, 2011, 03:12:54 PM
Early Tanks

US:
M3 Stuart (Light)
M3 Lee

UK:
Matilda
MK I

Germany:
Panzer I
Panzer II
Panzer III
(All Panzer)

Russia:
BT7 :huh
T-35

Add Some More To The Wish List, I'm Sure Some Of My Choices May Be Projects.
In order to show em' Nazi tanks a lesson, add the LW 105mm Sherman tank or M4(105)!
« Last Edit: October 14, 2011, 10:12:49 AM by 1Nicolas »
Logged

(My World Of Tank signature)
There are no great men, just great challenges which ordinary men, out of necessity, are forced by circumstances to meet.

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #27 on: October 14, 2011, 10:11:30 AM »
Quote from: 1Nicolas on October 14, 2011, 10:08:35 AM
In order to show em' Nazi tanks a lesson, add the LW 105mm Sherman tank or Jumbo Sherman!
ive been begging for the 105mm Howitzer Sherman for along time.
But don't think that just because its got that big "105mm" number, that its a devastating tank killer.

And wasn't the jumbo sherman basically a Sherman which had thicker frontal armor than a tiger, but only packed the 75mm cannon?
Logged

Offline bortas1

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1227
Re: Early War Tanks That Should Possibly Added
« Reply #28 on: October 14, 2011, 10:16:45 AM »
Quote from: DMVIAGRA on October 13, 2011, 06:34:23 AM
Yes, but they would be a nice addition. I don't play EW too often, but imagine these in the Main Arena you know. They're small, they'd be difficult to hit, but easily crippled. M3 Lee would be nice though!
:salute i really dont remember but, us called m3 grant, brits called them lee. i could be wrong.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »