Author Topic: Kawasaki Ki.100  (Read 8638 times)

Offline AHTbolt

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 582
Kawasaki Ki.100
« on: October 12, 2011, 08:26:50 PM »
Very interesting late war Japanese fighter.



Kawasaki Ki.100-I

Type:           Fighter
Service:    Japanese Army Air Force (JAAF)
Crew:           Pilot
Armament:       two 12.7mm Type 1 (Ho-103) machine guns in nose
      two 12.7mm Type 1 (Ho-103) machine guns in wings
      (later models included 20mm and 30mm cannons)
Reference:    Francillon: 129, Mondey:

Specifications:
        Length:         28' 11.25" (8.82 m)
        Height:         12' 3.6" (3.75 m)
        Wingspan:       39' 4.5" (12 m)
        Wing area:      215.278 sq. ft (20 sq. m)
        Empty Weight:   5567 lbs (2525 kg)
        Loaded Weight:  7705 lbs (3495 kg)

Propulsion:
        No. of Engines: 1
        Powerplant:     Mitsubishi [Ha-33] 62 14-cyclinder radial engine
        Horsepower:     1500 hp

Performance:
        Range (normal): 870 miles (1400 km)
        Range (max):    1367 miles (2200 km)
        Cruise Speed:   249 mph (400 km/h) at 13,125 ft
        Max Speed:      360 mph (580 km/h) at 19,685 ft
        Climb to/in:    16,405 ft (5000 m) in 6 min 0 sec
        Ceiling:        36,090 ft (11,000 m)

Production:      approximately 396 Ki-100s total

information found here http://www.daveswarbirds.com/Nippon/Japanese.htm
AWWWWW CRAP YOU SHOT WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In the desert somewhere west of Kuwait 1991.

Offline Mitsu.

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 195
Re: Kawasaki Ki.100
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2011, 08:44:32 PM »
+1

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Kawasaki Ki.100
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2011, 08:53:43 PM »
I have never heard of a Ki-100 armed only with 12.7mm machine guns.  I suspect your source is in error.  Seeing as they are re-engined Ki-61-IIs they should share the same armament, two 12.7mm Ho-103 machine guns and two 20mm Ho-5 cannons.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: Kawasaki Ki.100
« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2011, 01:42:43 AM »
I have never heard of a Ki-100 armed only with 12.7mm machine guns.  I suspect your source is in error.  Seeing as they are re-engined Ki-61-IIs they should share the same armament, two 12.7mm Ho-103 machine guns and two 20mm Ho-5 cannons.

(later models included 20mm and 30mm cannons)<---<<<

He did mention that.  Perhaps only preproduction or very early models had just the 12.7mm, and most of the actual types fielded was with the 20mm?

Offline MK-84

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: Kawasaki Ki.100
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2011, 01:43:47 AM »
Oh I forgot to add a +1 :rolleyes:

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Kawasaki Ki.100
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2011, 02:59:14 AM »
(later models included 20mm and 30mm cannons)<---<<<

He did mention that.  Perhaps only preproduction or very early models had just the 12.7mm, and most of the actual types fielded was with the 20mm?

No, there shouldn't be any with just 12.7mm guns.  Some earlier Ki-61-Is had four 12.7mm guns, but by the time the Ki-61-II was being built they were all armed with two 12.7mm and two 20mm guns.  All Ki-100s were derived from the Ki-61-II.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8576
"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline Slade

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1848
Re: Kawasaki Ki.100
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2011, 12:02:46 PM »
+1
-- Flying as X15 --

Offline Mitsu.

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 195
Re: Kawasaki Ki.100
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2011, 05:17:23 PM »
Two 250 rounds 20mm cannons on the nose would be enough fire power for that Ki!  :salute

It would out-turn Ki-84.  :rock
And it has good climb, but slower speed, and slower roll.  :D

Also it will not blow off ailerons or elevators while diving...  :lol
« Last Edit: October 17, 2011, 05:26:04 PM by Mitsu. »

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8576
Re: Kawasaki Ki.100
« Reply #9 on: October 18, 2011, 01:20:52 AM »
No 30-mm weapon was fitted to this type. The armament was identical to Aces High's Ki-61, two cowl mounted 20-mm Cannon and two wing mounted 12.7-mm MG.
"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: Kawasaki Ki.100
« Reply #10 on: October 18, 2011, 12:32:57 PM »
As I understood it before, the Ki-61 woud outperform it. Wrong?
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Kawasaki Ki.100
« Reply #11 on: October 18, 2011, 02:59:17 PM »
It was more reliable, not a better performer, for the most part.

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8576
Re: Kawasaki Ki.100
« Reply #12 on: October 18, 2011, 03:07:47 PM »
Ah Krusty's back. Where have you been? We were on the point of sending out a search party.

You have to qualify the term outperform. The Ki-100 gained a considerable power increase and enjoyed a considerable weight saving over the Ki-61 it replaced, with the associated benefits to those changes. Although there was more drag so the top speed was slightly lower.

Some of us hope that when the prehistoric looking AH model of the Ki-61 gets revamped, HTC will go the extra mile and include the Ki-100 too (also perhaps a few more versions of the Ki-61 (and correct the weight of the one we have)). Would be an opportunity to add a clutch of Japanese aircraft in one go  :banana:
"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Kawasaki Ki.100
« Reply #13 on: October 18, 2011, 03:24:22 PM »
Life sucks, it's been keeping my busy.

Keep in mind the Ki61 was already flying well into the end of the war. The Ki-100 saw limited service, in limited areas, even though 100-200 were constructed.

There is also a major difference between a radial and an inline. It's not just power and weight. Look at a P-36 and a P-40 for comparison.

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Re: Kawasaki Ki.100
« Reply #14 on: October 18, 2011, 05:59:17 PM »
I believe it's climb rate increased greatly and the top speed was a few mph slower at all altitudes.