Author Topic: IL-2 was left out.  (Read 7548 times)

Offline Raptor05121

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 486
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #30 on: December 30, 2011, 02:00:40 PM »
Plus (and I know I have said it elsewhere) the PTAB

below is a short video clip of the effect of a single IL2 PTAB salvo

http://www.youtu.be/watch?v=H_huv58MGYE&feature=related


here are a bunch being deployed from a Yak 9B

(Image removed from quote.)

The design has not changed much over the last 70years Russians were still using them in Afghanistan in an anti personnel role.

(Image removed from quote.)



SWEETT!!!! We can still bomb**** some GVs and get UBER perks for it at the same time  :x
InGame: xRaptorx of the ***Alchemists***

Quote from: dirtdart
To suggest things that do not meet this basic criteria is equal to masturbation.  It may feel good to you, will not produce any tangible results, and you may be embarrassed if you get caught. 

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #31 on: December 30, 2011, 05:20:41 PM »
Interesting the IL-2 had mechanical indicators on the wings like the Spitfires to let you know if the landing gear was up or down.

(Image removed from quote.)

     Some habits die hard, the Mig-15 had barber pole indicators for the gear poking out of the top of the wing too  :D
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline wil3ur

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1990
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #32 on: December 30, 2011, 05:23:25 PM »
(Image removed from quote.)

It's like seeing the A10's grandpappy...  beautiful plane.
"look at me I am making a derogatory remark to the OP"


Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #33 on: December 30, 2011, 05:24:10 PM »
Interesting the IL-2 had mechanical indicators on the wings like the Spitfires to let you know if the landing gear was up or down.

As did the la5 & la7
Ludere Vincere

Offline Seadog36

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 666
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #34 on: December 30, 2011, 05:50:09 PM »
The A6M-2 also had mechanical indicators although they dont have them in the game. I have had experience around an original A6M-2 that was at a Transportation museum that I volunteer at. The original sakie engines are almost impossible to find parts for. This had a P&W 1830. Beautiful plane though... 

Owl's Head X-portation Museum?

Offline SpencAce

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 128
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #35 on: December 31, 2011, 05:56:51 PM »
normaly i would agree, but i like to see different varients of pre-exsisting aircraft when the differences in the versions are very drastic. :airplane:
**SSgt**

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10633
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #36 on: December 31, 2011, 09:02:07 PM »
normaly i would agree, but i like to see different varients of pre-exsisting aircraft when the differences in the versions are very drastic. :airplane:
1 seat V's 2 seat not drastic enough for you?

Different engines,different ord packages depending on time frame.

Early war arena compatible,better rear views due to no armour,or light armour depending on time frame.

IL-10 is a huge change than our current IL-2.

Offline Seadog36

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 666
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #37 on: January 01, 2012, 06:42:15 AM »
1 seat V's 2 seat not drastic enough for you?

Different engines,different ord packages depending on time frame.

Early war arena compatible,better rear views due to no armour,or light armour depending on time frame.

IL-10 is a huge change than our current IL-2.

+1 Well researched and interesting~ I feel your pain, want a D-15 through D-23 Jug, should be easy as pie to do. Doesn't' require major alteration of the existing model, but it seems like it is more likely we will end up with a Piper L-4 before either of us get gratified lol.

Offline Seadog36

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 666
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #38 on: January 01, 2012, 07:09:31 AM »
+1 Well researched and interesting~ I feel your pain, want a D-15 through D-23 Jug, should be easy as pie to do. Doesn't' require major alteration of the existing model, but it seems like it is more likely we will end up with a Piper L-4 before either of us get gratified lol.

Check out this crazy story about an L-4 pilot taking out tanks with 6 bazookas strapped to the struts~

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Carpenter_(Lt._Col.)

Offline lyric1

  • Skinner Team
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10633
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #39 on: April 12, 2012, 05:38:01 PM »

Offline Raphael

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2010
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #40 on: April 12, 2012, 08:33:33 PM »
hell I would pay perks for the IL10
Remember 08/08/2012
 Youtube videos - http://www.youtube.com/user/raphael103/featured
Game ID => Raphael
XO of Jg5

Offline Reaper90

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3322
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #41 on: April 13, 2012, 07:27:52 AM »
Check out this crazy story about an L-4 pilot taking out tanks with 6 bazookas strapped to the struts~

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Carpenter_(Lt._Col.)

Wow. Awesome.... that was one hell'of a man.  :salute
Floyd
'Murican dude in a Brit Squad flying Russian birds, drinking Canadian whiskey

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #42 on: April 13, 2012, 06:35:54 PM »
Wow. Awesome.... that was one hell'of a man.  :salute



I think the Lt. Colonel unlocked this achievement on his Xbox automatically.
JG 52

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #43 on: April 15, 2012, 11:28:20 AM »
(Image removed from quote.)

I think the Lt. Colonel unlocked this achievement on his Xbox automatically.
:lol
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Noir

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5964
Re: IL-2 was left out.
« Reply #44 on: April 16, 2012, 04:16:56 PM »
a such important airplane with so many versions could indeed have a couple more versions in AH... :salute
now posting as SirNuke