They both were accurate and non-contradictory.
Fair enough... The signals you sent were
mixed, and I wasn't the only one to mention it (I wasn't even the first). You can't blame me for that.
I wouldn't have voted 410 without likelihood of SS'er because without it it's too redundant to say with a straight face that we (we, IMO) need it more than a Beaufighter or Meteor or Ki-something-early-war or whatever.
...and comments like that are where I get this from:
Where you pull this stuff from like you could be so sure of it is a mystery to me.
Saying something like that, with that choice of words, suggests you only care about the single seater. If that's not the case, then I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. You might want to re-read before posting. It could be read as saying you only care about the single seater (for example), or it could mean as you suggest now it's true meaning is that the single seater puts it above the others on the list, but isn't the only reason you want it. This latter message doesn't come through as strongly.
So, again: sorry for the mixup.
EDIT: P.S. If we're going to nitpick, in my comment I said "IF"... IF. If not, then it's not a problem.