Author Topic: Fraps performance hit?  (Read 3669 times)

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17362
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #15 on: October 31, 2011, 11:22:54 PM »
Fraps records really large files.   It will fill up 200 gigs in less than a week recording just a few hours.

Semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #16 on: October 31, 2011, 11:31:19 PM »
The best method I have found is to use the MB controller in unison with a second controller like PCIe. If you fly off of the MB controller and record FRAPS to a HD on the PCIe controller the performance hit on your system is greatly reduced. You may notice a pretty good hit as you start recording just the same. And its cheaper than an SSD method even if you go with SATA3.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #17 on: October 31, 2011, 11:57:22 PM »
Do you mean something like a PCI card with SATA headers?

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #18 on: November 01, 2011, 12:00:59 AM »
My research has indicated that it is random writes that kill SSD life.  Fraps recordings would be sequential writes though, so I don't think they should be a problem.

It's more like any single cluster on that drive can only be written to "X" amount of times. After that it no longer works. So, what they do is they load-balance it... They scatter it across the drive to try not to hit the same clusters too many times.

This also means that if you have a 100GB drive, there is probably more than that much on the drive, as they keep some room reserved to do something (I can't recall what, but I think it was to hide the sectors that are no longer used and reveal fresh ones?).

So sequential or random it doesn't matter. They're not on a patter drive, so the controller is placing them where it thinks is best, not where the next free spot is.

Offline Shane

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7648
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #19 on: November 01, 2011, 03:49:43 AM »
the controller is placing them where it thinks is best...

so, SDD leads to Skynet to Neo?    :noid
Surrounded by suck and underwhelmed with mediocrity.
I'm always right, it just takes some poepl longer to come to that realization than others.
I'm not perfect, but I am closer to it than you are.
"...vox populi, vox dei..."  ~Alcuin ca. 798
Truth doesn't need exaggeration.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #20 on: November 01, 2011, 09:24:40 AM »
I also would have accepted MCP references, a la Tron.

Offline BoilerDown

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1926
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #21 on: November 21, 2011, 02:20:23 PM »
I just received the Plextor PX-256M2P SSD I ordered.  With luck I'll be installing Windows 7 (64 bit) on this thing over the Thanksgiving holiday and I'll see just how much a SSD affects Fraps performance (among other things).
Boildown

This is the Captain.  We have a lil' problem with our entry sequence so we may experience some slight turbulence and then... explode.

Boildown is Twitching: http://www.twitch.tv/boildown

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17362
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #22 on: November 22, 2011, 10:33:15 PM »
warning do not record fraps to ssd, they are huge files we talking gigabytes within minutes.  it will fill up your space within a few days if you arent careful.  if you must then only record when you are actually in a fight and not just the whole flight.


semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline BoilerDown

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1926
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #23 on: November 23, 2011, 09:47:48 AM »
warning do not record fraps to ssd, they are huge files we talking gigabytes within minutes.  it will fill up your space within a few days if you arent careful.  if you must then only record when you are actually in a fight and not just the whole flight.

I have every intention of recording directly to the SSD, otherwise there wouldn't be much of a test, would there?  If performance is noticeably improved, then I'll record directly to the SSD as the default setting as well.  But I also intend to transfer the files off to a platter disk as soon as I'm out of the game, or at least before I fly and capture again.  And no I won't be capturing the whole time, no one wants to see my climb out, lol.  I do have a general idea of how much space each minute of footage takes up and will make sure not to fill the SSD.
Boildown

This is the Captain.  We have a lil' problem with our entry sequence so we may experience some slight turbulence and then... explode.

Boildown is Twitching: http://www.twitch.tv/boildown

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17362
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #24 on: November 23, 2011, 04:15:04 PM »
cool let me know how the testing goes and how it affects the ssd.  if it works for you, i may get one for myself  :rock.


semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Rob52240

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3770
      • My AH Films
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #25 on: November 23, 2011, 04:21:27 PM »
I notice a hit in game but not with the film viewer
If I had a gun with 3 bullets and I was locked in a room with Bin Laden, Hitler, Saddam and Zipp...  I would shoot Zipp 3 times.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #26 on: November 28, 2011, 12:52:25 PM »
The film viewer requires a lot less muscle to render than the actual game does, FYI. If you're getting slowdown in real-time recording, try rolling AH film and then record from the film.

I would suggest not rolling AH film WHILE running fraps, unless you have fraps set to save to a different HD than Aces High. You don't want too many competing I/O commands being run to save those big files on the same disk.

Offline Flifast

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 311
      • Claim Jumpers
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #27 on: December 04, 2011, 09:16:21 AM »
Krusty
That's what Fraps experts told me.  Play on one HD or SSD and record on a 2nd HD.
What size of SSD do you have and do I need a 10,000 WD for best recording or will my 1TB 72,000 work as my 2nd hard drive?

I did have a problem going from Fraps to Movie Maker, but the issue was an outdated version of Movie Maker that recorded in something like 480x480!  The new Movie Maker is harder to use but HD quality.

Here is a question.  I have about 1/2 TB of recordings of Aces High and want to cleanup my HD.  What external HD would work and would it matter USB 2.0 or 3.0 or maybe wifi?  Any external HD would you recommend?

Flifast

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #28 on: December 04, 2011, 12:52:40 PM »
The HD doesn't need to be blazing fast to save files with FRAPs. It's just that adding multiple simultaneous read/writes on the same drive will slow you down. The 1tb you have will do just fine.


Note, however, that FRAPS doesn't compress audio. You can cut down your files significantly if you re-encode them afterwards with MP3 audio compression. It will save a CHUNK of HD space. Trust me on that!

Offline BoilerDown

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1926
Re: Fraps performance hit?
« Reply #29 on: December 05, 2011, 09:29:22 PM »
Note, however, that FRAPS doesn't compress audio. You can cut down your files significantly if you re-encode them afterwards with MP3 audio compression. It will save a CHUNK of HD space. Trust me on that!

No.  Just keep them regular size until you do whatever video project you plan to do.  The audio only accounts for around 1% of the total file size.


Properties of a Fraps file of mine picked at random:

General
Complete name                  : D:\Fraps\Yak9TestLRearChase6.avi
Format                         : AVI
Format/Info                    : Audio Video Interleave
File size                      : 3.95 GiB
Duration                       : 2mn 17s
Overall bit rate               : 247 Mbps

Video
ID                             : 0
Format                         : Fraps
Codec ID                       : FPS1
Duration                       : 2mn 17s
Bit rate                       : 246 Mbps
Width                          : 1 680 pixels
Height                         : 1 050 pixels
Display aspect ratio           : 1.600
Frame rate                     : 30.000 fps
Bits/(Pixel*Frame)             : 4.643
Stream size                    : 3.93 GiB (99%)

Audio
ID                             : 1
Format                         : PCM
Format settings, Endianness    : Little
Format settings, Sign          : Signed
Codec ID                       : 1
Duration                       : 2mn 17s
Bit rate mode                  : Constant
Bit rate                       : 1 411.2 Kbps
Channel(s)                     : 2 channels
Sampling rate                  : 44.1 KHz
Bit depth                      : 16 bits
Stream size                    : 23.1 MiB (1%)
Interleave, duration           : 995 ms (29.86 video frames)
Boildown

This is the Captain.  We have a lil' problem with our entry sequence so we may experience some slight turbulence and then... explode.

Boildown is Twitching: http://www.twitch.tv/boildown