Author Topic: LAGG-3  (Read 601 times)

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
LAGG-3
« on: November 02, 2011, 08:08:55 AM »
Was thinking about which ride's would best fill rolls in FSO's and Scenarios (Snapshots as well). I will post other aircraft for example He-111, but I'd like to focus on Operation Barbarossa's need for a russian fighter. While the German's mainly had the Me-109E, F4 and Me-110c, the Russians had the I-16 and LAGG-3 - also for example the Finnish Campaign, would certainly get a boost with the LAGG-3.

Although its nothing pretty, and it won't out turn a 109 or out run it, but its something that fought both the Finnish and German's in the Early War. so thumbs up!  :aok

Specifications:

Span 32.18ft
Length 28.90ft
Height 14.43
1 × Klimov M-105PF liquid-cooled V-12, 924 kW (1,260 hp)
Take off weight 7231 lbs
Enemy A/c Weight 5754 lbs
Max speed on 0m 294.5 mph
Max speed at Alt 341.1mph at 16404ft
Service Alt: 30,511 ft
Range: 705 km
Armament: 1x20mm, 1x12.7mm, 2x7.62mm
Also can carry 8x RS-82 ground attack rockets



JG 52

Offline AHTbolt

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 582
Re: LAGG-3
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2011, 08:13:11 AM »
+1
AWWWWW CRAP YOU SHOT WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In the desert somewhere west of Kuwait 1991.

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: LAGG-3
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2011, 09:08:29 AM »
 :aok  more early war
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: LAGG-3
« Reply #3 on: November 02, 2011, 09:33:23 AM »
along with tha jak3
 :aok
AoM
City of ice

Offline Bino

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5938
Re: LAGG-3
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2011, 09:34:22 AM »
This would be a good addition for early-war special events.  :aok


"The plural of 'anecdote' is not 'data'." - Randy Pausch

PC Specs

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: LAGG-3
« Reply #5 on: November 02, 2011, 09:41:45 AM »
I would definitely back the LaGG-3 early series.

However, when considering the "might" of the VVS at the beginning of their war, Stalin was a fanatic for numbers -- just numbers, not actual capability.

The vast majority of the VVS when the Germans invaded were obsolete 1930s airframes, most biplanes, and most that weren't biplanes were I-16s.

What we're missing from an early war lineup would include I-15s, I-153s, SB-2s, IL-4s, and so forth.

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: LAGG-3
« Reply #6 on: November 02, 2011, 09:47:54 AM »
when was the last time did we add a russian AC, not including land least?
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: LAGG-3
« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2011, 09:54:36 AM »
land least?
ahem...lend leased. just pointing that out for you. fairly certain i land the least of anyone i know.  :D
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: LAGG-3
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2011, 09:58:26 AM »
ahem...lend leased. just pointing that out for you. fairly certain i land the least of anyone i know.  :D

Thanks for the correction.     :salute
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10196
Re: LAGG-3
« Reply #9 on: November 02, 2011, 10:49:24 AM »
+1
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline Butcher

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5323
Re: LAGG-3
« Reply #10 on: November 02, 2011, 11:36:19 AM »
I would definitely back the LaGG-3 early series.

However, when considering the "might" of the VVS at the beginning of their war, Stalin was a fanatic for numbers -- just numbers, not actual capability.

The vast majority of the VVS when the Germans invaded were obsolete 1930s airframes, most biplanes, and most that weren't biplanes were I-16s.

What we're missing from an early war lineup would include I-15s, I-153s, SB-2s, IL-4s, and so forth.

Very true, however my reasoning with the LAGG-3 over the I-15 is basically both are bi-planes, I feel the LAGG-3 would be voted over both if it came down to it, mainly the LAGG-3 did some 340mph, however it was a horrible handler when it came as a fighter, completely outclassed by everything except the ME-110c.

If I had to add 2 planes in the game right now for Early War, I certainly want the LAGG-3 and the He-111, much as I would love to see the Tupolev SB - I highly doubt it would be out voted over the He-111.

If I had to make 4 choices, then LAGG-3, Mig-3, Tupolev SB, and He-111. All four were critical to early war in russia.
I think after the four get made, we could certainly go even more early war and go for the I-153's, I-15's, Gloster Gladiator, Fiat CR.32 and of course PZL P.7.

I really don't see a Polish campaign ever being done, however this is simply the Early War in russia (1941 to early 1942), I will make a bid for the French Campaign next, I certainly want to see more Early War periods in the game.

JG 52

Offline Tyrannis

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3931
Re: LAGG-3
« Reply #11 on: November 02, 2011, 12:07:47 PM »
-1.
IAR-80  :cry

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: LAGG-3
« Reply #12 on: November 02, 2011, 12:53:44 PM »
Hey they mounted the NS-37 in it.......thats something...... ;)
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.