Author Topic: PBY Idea  (Read 2236 times)

Offline Rob52240

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3770
      • My AH Films
PBY Idea
« on: November 14, 2011, 01:05:35 PM »
Ok, first off I'm not too keen on having the PBY but it was a really cool plane.

I haven't given this a ton of thought but I was thinking that a PBY could mark enemy task groups on the map.  Not a tag that would move with the carrier but a temporary Carrier spotted here dot or icon on the map. 
A lamer secondary use could be to resupply PT boats.
If I had a gun with 3 bullets and I was locked in a room with Bin Laden, Hitler, Saddam and Zipp...  I would shoot Zipp 3 times.

Offline Wiley

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8101
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2011, 01:43:23 PM »
Or, y'know...  You could hypothetically launch a 'fighter' which flies 3 or 4 times as fast as a PBY, and call the task group out on country channel.  This has the added bonus that if you find an enemy plane, you could fight with him on the way to finding the task group.

Wiley.
If you think you are having a 1v1 in the Main Arena, your SA has failed you.

JG11

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2011, 01:52:06 PM »
There is nothing within the realm of Aces High that the PBY could do to benefit game play, realism, etc.  It is slower than a seven year itch, armed not for a fight, and it cant see any further than anything else.  Oh, whats that?  It can carry torps? So can the Ju88, B5N, TBM, and Ki-67.   

The only thing HTC could possibly do with it is to resupply CV's, but I doubt the will go that route.
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2011, 01:55:37 PM »
Ok, first off I'm not too keen on having the PBY but it was a really cool plane.

I haven't given this a ton of thought but I was thinking that a PBY could mark enemy task groups on the map.  Not a tag that would move with the carrier but a temporary Carrier spotted here dot or icon on the map. 
A lamer secondary use could be to resupply PT boats.

Not a new idea, but I've always liked it.  A small indicator map with an arrow pointing the direction of travel that stays on the map for 5-10 minutes.  Beats trying to find that information on a sometimes scattered and frantic country channel.

I like the re-sup CV idea as well.
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Folks, play nice.

Offline Rob52240

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3770
      • My AH Films
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2011, 01:59:09 PM »
What is it about the PBY that makes so many of us like it so much? 

I'd love to own one and turn it into an RV?  I can't really come up with anything else.
If I had a gun with 3 bullets and I was locked in a room with Bin Laden, Hitler, Saddam and Zipp...  I would shoot Zipp 3 times.

Offline james

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 849
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2011, 05:40:48 PM »
My wife's grandfather flew these in the pacific. They were
considered trucks of the air for some and angels of mercy to others.
Enemy sub drivers were not so happy to see them if they did see them at all.
Not all pby's were outfit like in call of duty. Alot of them though were called upon
to do scouting. The plane would need something to kill, scout, or rescue to be completely
used as it was. It would need to be allowed to supply things as well. There's more to adding this plane
than slapping a black cat cod sticker on it to get it added to the game.
I'm all for it and would love to take a trip to the museum down in Virginia beach
to get some skinning shots for our artists if its needed.
6GUN  

4.0GHZ Ryzen9 3900x
32GB DDR4 3200
GTX1070

Offline MAINER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 607
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2011, 06:52:51 PM »
+1
Are those our bombers?-famous last words



 Member of the congregation of The church of David Wales

Offline titanic3

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4235
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2011, 07:03:14 PM »
H8K Emily.  :noid


  the game is concentrated on combat, not on shaking the screen.

semp

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2011, 08:50:33 PM »
Well, the PBY can carry two American torps. Might I remind you, that's the two big 2000 lb torps we have... you get 6 or 8 PBYs, you can completely wreck a TG.

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17425
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2011, 11:58:06 PM »
Sure and ask the pbys will return home undamaged.


Semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline wil3ur

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1990
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #10 on: November 15, 2011, 10:09:36 AM »
Resupplying Island Ports as are in many maps would be a great use for a flying boat.  I'm for it.

...and for the record, I hate this, "I won't fly it so no one else will either" arguement that keeps popping up on these threads.
"look at me I am making a derogatory remark to the OP"


Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #11 on: November 15, 2011, 11:01:25 AM »
It is funny how some people will argue for a fighter based on it's historical significance, even if it won't perform real well in the MA.  They say it fills a gap in the planeset.  However, when a historically significant cargo aircraft comes along, it's a waste of resources.

I'm not saying the PBY is high priority, there are some gameplay dynamics that need to change before it would have a good role.  I'm just pointing out the ego-centrism of our ideas.
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Folks, play nice.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #12 on: November 15, 2011, 11:09:31 AM »
It is funny how some people will argue for a fighter based on it's historical significance, even if it won't perform real well in the MA.  They say it fills a gap in the planeset.  However, when a historically significant cargo aircraft comes along, it's a waste of resources.
Because it does not fill a gap in AH due to the nature of AH gameplay.  This is true of the MA, where neither the PBY-5 or Ki-43 fill a gap, and for events where the PBY-5 does not fill a gap but the Ki-43 does.

If AH had all the roles that existed historically as useful roles in the game, then the PBY-5 would be a gap filler.

At the very least, should HTC choose to experiment with the flying boat's roles, they ought to add either the H8K2 'Emily' or Sunderland first, flying boats that have some potential outside of the PBY-5's limitations.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2011, 11:13:44 AM by Karnak »
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17425
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #13 on: November 15, 2011, 12:37:47 PM »
Resupplying Island Ports as are in many maps would be a great use for a flying boat.  I'm for it.

...and for the record, I hate this, "I won't fly it so no one else will either" arguement that keeps popping up on these threads.

lol those arguments are true.  see the last planes that have been added that "everybody" wanted and very few people fly.  if you really want the pby then start upping current planes that we have that are similar and try to fill the roll that you want.  once you get the usage up come here and post on your experiences.


semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline wil3ur

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1990
Re: PBY Idea
« Reply #14 on: November 15, 2011, 01:16:22 PM »
lol those arguments are true.  see the last planes that have been added that "everybody" wanted and very few people fly.  if you really want the pby then start upping current planes that we have that are similar and try to fill the roll that you want.  once you get the usage up come here and post on your experiences.


semp

I think I give almost every plane in here a twirl now and then; rarely the spit or pony series, but other than that...  I enjoy flying what there is to be offered here, and would love a new addition.  I would also like a JU52 added.  Why should we be tied down and forced to fly C47s?

If your arguement is because another plane already fills that roll, then I guess HTC should just stop developing planes all together, because in the current setup every roll has already been filled.

Not everybody is in here to fly the bestest fastest most deadliestest armed aircraft... some of us get a kick out JU87 missions in Late War... OMG!  Waste of resources!  There's better ways to take down a field!  Why would anyone fly those?!?!  They're slow and defenseless!!!  They must be IDIOTS!  HiTech should probably take them out of the game.
"look at me I am making a derogatory remark to the OP"