P-47.

[4Prop]

D-11,D-40,N models.

discuss

[Karnak]

Yes, they are all in the game. Discuss what about them?

[4Prop]

characteristics. tactics.

personally i use the excellent tail control to maneover.

I think the engine and paddle prop is undermodeled.

[Nathan60]

Yes, they are all in the game. Discuss what about them?

You get pilot wounds in them  and  no bullet holes in  canopy? Personally I Like the 11 the  most of those  3  rarely up a  N,  take a 40  heavy, but of  course I really like flying the  -25, of  course I  dont float them around   like you  do, Pretty much  keep it  to a  BnZ but  will  twist it  up  if I can see the  other guy is at  a clear  disadvantage  even if hes in a better turner  and avoid  climbing turns

[Krusty]

4prop, if you have a question ask it. If you have a point make it. Don't post just to pad your post count.


Because that's all your original post can be construed as.


Might as well have said "Diabetes: discuss."

That's not a topic. That's not even a statement. The closest thing you could describe it as is an imperative order. Best not to be ordering the entire forum around for your own amusement.

[Nathan60]

 "Diabetes: discuss."

Die  Ah Bee tees' or  Die ah Betus

Discuss

Also, he  already was called out to clarify what he  wanted to discuss in paticular.

[Karnak]

I think the engine and paddle prop is undermodeled.

Why do you think this?

[Krusty]

I'm not calling him out to clarify. I'm calling him out as a post count padder. There was nothing to discuss. He's just added that afterwards because (as you mention) he was called out on lack of topic. I'm calling him out on his intents more than the lack of topic.

[Nathan60]

Does  AH actually take into  account the paticular prop used? Also,  Krusty I see what your  saying but  now Karnak has  asked about  the prop undermodleing and I  am interested to learn about this now!

[Krusty]

Yes, AH does. The question you should ask is: Is that the particular plane we have in-game?

[JUGgler]

D-11,D-40,N models.

discuss

I pwn you!


discuss 




JUGgler

[4Prop]

I'm not calling him out to clarify. I'm calling him out as a post count padder. There was nothing to discuss. He's just added that afterwards because (as you mention) he was called out on lack of topic. I'm calling him out on his intents more than the lack of topic.

coming from someone with as many posts as you? thats cute 

the jugs that are suppost to have the paddle blade props dont climb like they should. I know this because I looked at many climb rate charts vs. AH climbrates. I'll have to look for them again because I dont remember exactly what they were but they (3 charts) were very comparable to P51 climb rates. In AH the R2800 is like a ford model T engine

[Debrody]

coming from someone with as many posts as you? thats cute 

the jugs that are suppost to have the paddle blade props dont climb like they should. I know this because I looked at many climb rate charts vs. AH climbrates. I'll have to look for them again because I dont remember exactly what they were but they (3 charts) were very comparable to P51 climb rates. In AH the R2800 is like a ford model T engine

until you post something exact, theres no apellata!
anyway a light jug can climb. just saying.

[Krusty]

coming from someone with as many posts as you? thats cute 

What's cute is you think that's 1) a defense, 2) an attack 3) relevant. MY posts are not in question here. Your attempt to post pad IS. See the difference? I'm not post count padding. You are.

[mthrockmor]

JUGler, the boo would pwn you. Just fly in that dang 47, low and slow, hold still and we'll see who's boss!

Boo