Author Topic: CERN is at it again  (Read 381 times)

Offline Melvin

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2797
CERN is at it again
« on: December 08, 2011, 07:23:05 PM »
The Higgs boson

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16074411

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2011/dec/06/is-higgs-boson-real

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2071507/Higgs-boson-particle-close-says-CERN.html



Perhaps they are on the verge of a breakthrough.

Perhaps they are trying to drum up publicity after the not so speedy neutrino.

Perhaps the interpretation of the Mayan calender was a year off.


One thing is for sure, the U.K. media are eating this stuff up.

Can you say "Euro bailout"?

 :headscratch:

 :salute
« Last Edit: December 08, 2011, 07:28:14 PM by Melvin »
See Rule #4

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
Re: CERN is at it again
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2011, 02:10:28 AM »
The Higgs boson

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16074411

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2011/dec/06/is-higgs-boson-real

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2071507/Higgs-boson-particle-close-says-CERN.html



Perhaps they are on the verge of a breakthrough.

Perhaps they are trying to drum up publicity after the not so speedy neutrino.

Perhaps the interpretation of the Mayan calender was a year off.


One thing is for sure, the U.K. media are eating this stuff up.

Can you say "Euro bailout"?

 :headscratch:

 :salute

I have a theory that says they accidentally created a black hole when they were colliding. And that's where all our money went.
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline Gh0stFT

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1736
Re: CERN is at it again
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2011, 07:30:06 AM »
"We have been looking for this for 30 years now, and finally, maybe, hidden under the back of the LHC sofa…we are finally finding it".
 :D
The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.