An unusual thing about the Me323 is the fact that there were no survivors at the end of the war. They had all been destroyed by accidents or in combat.
how, there are still planes that can carry tanks
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.
Lol, yeah, those 9-10 ton light tanks with 15mm of armor. Good 'effing luck getting any WWII aircraft off the ground with not just 1 panzer IV on board, but MULTIPLE panzer IV's.Only reason we can carry of our modern MBT's, let alone 2 or 3, is because of the turbo jet, and the aircraft themselves are larger.
13 year old calling a 11 year old kid :old
only a moron would use Dolby positioning in a game.
NO IM 13! DUH! lol
The B-29 could lift the weight of a Panzer IV or T-34, but not the shape.
Only 6 engines I think you might get.(Image removed from quote.)(Image removed from quote.)
"look at me I am making a derogatory remark to the OP"
holy crap lyric, those are some sweet pics of the wing mounted gun turrets.. come on guys how can u tell me that those manned turrets in the wings wouldn't be fun to operate.
this plane only had 2 prototypes built, i know, i know,, so nobody start b--ching at me about how it never saw service. k.. it was the first plane considered to be used for the heavy water project (atomic attack on america). it was one of the largest bomber they ever used and ,, honest i think it would be cool to have a plane with 6 engines anyway.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junkers_Ju_390
