you really amaze me..... you're like the guy who told me.. yea we're fighting a long battle... but in actual fact it was only a 2 vs 2 battle or over 3-4 bases conflict... sure....
Complete BS
it must be that the rooks just totally suck at flying and gving that we got our bases pushed back so far... nothing to do with anyone but our faults rite?? amazing
Which demonstrates my point about bias even better.
Within two days Knights captured a lot of Rook bases. Then Rooks came and tool them all back but one. But when I logged in today, it's been reversed again, Knights do own huge part ow Rookland now. All within the last two days.
Almost the same happened on Bish-Knight front. We Nits had been occupying a good part of the Bish coast two days ago, then we were kicked out. Yesterday the Bish pushed deep into our territory (P132 was in their hands for about 10 hours), and last night the Nits finally got almost all of their bases back.
2-3 player actions my ***

Screenshot from a film recorded 17 hours ago.
I guess you are just logging in, see the territory your side has lost, and instantly went into whine mode. "They never fight each other"
That's the kind of stuff that really aggravates me. Bias, lies,made up facts.
Philosophical question:
If, according to
- Rooks, Bish and Nits never fight
- Bishops, Nits and Rook never fight
- Knights, Rook and Bish never fight
... where do the hundreds of thousands of kills come from each tour?